Tweet
ADVISERS ARE THE ISSUE
George Bush administration has made lots of mistakes, mostly planned
mistakes but whatever was been done was done professionally, by the
best analysts and experts on regional policy on the Near East.
In some regions the ground was prepared for revolutions, as well as
for more large-scale changes, such as demarcation and emergence of
new states. Real strategy is made for the next administration, not
for the current one, without party distinctions. The essence of the
strategy is not the goal but the tactics with an intensive dynamics
of events and processes.
The so-called neo-conservatives shadowed "modest" analysts and policy
makers who continue doing their job but unfortunately outside the
American administration.
In fact, Obama administration is not well-established, considering the
gaps in its staff, and the Near Eastern team is weak and inadequate.
The U.S. policy on Syria demonstrated the intellectual misery of
people who are making decisions at the State Department. Marginal
experts who cannot be called experts in the full sense of the world
offered a logical scheme of developments over a year ago. Today the
leading experts of the United States, United Kingdom and France are
at a loss and admit their "incompetency". And only specialists of
the Department of State know how to act.
The main mistake was that it was possible to agree with Bashar Assad
anything except two things which hardly worried the Americans (he and
others in his team were ready for that, for a lot, which was told
to Nicolas Sarkozy during his visit to Paris). They refused that,
expecting easier ways of resolving problems. Soon Francois Hollande
came to rescue of the American president-misunderstanding Obama, his
French copy, and it was no longer boring in this company. Francois
Hollande's policy was classics of betrayal of fundamental French
interests in the Near East.
In fact, there is "order" and "agreement" in this game, namely the
West has made up its mind to achieve new systemic positions in the
Arab world by doing such a considerable favor to Saudi Arabia and
its satellites. It ended up in utter failure of "agreements", so on
the eve of the international conference on Syria the United States
is trying to save at least its face, if not the Syrian opposition or
more exactly the Saudi mercenaries.
Who is to blame for the failure of the American politics if not Barack
Obama's marginal team? America is resting. The American people are
waiting for the Republicans to come, no matter in whose face, to save
this country and a lot more other things in the world.
Igor Muradyan 15:10 17/06/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/politics/view/30186
George Bush administration has made lots of mistakes, mostly planned
mistakes but whatever was been done was done professionally, by the
best analysts and experts on regional policy on the Near East.
In some regions the ground was prepared for revolutions, as well as
for more large-scale changes, such as demarcation and emergence of
new states. Real strategy is made for the next administration, not
for the current one, without party distinctions. The essence of the
strategy is not the goal but the tactics with an intensive dynamics
of events and processes.
The so-called neo-conservatives shadowed "modest" analysts and policy
makers who continue doing their job but unfortunately outside the
American administration.
In fact, Obama administration is not well-established, considering the
gaps in its staff, and the Near Eastern team is weak and inadequate.
The U.S. policy on Syria demonstrated the intellectual misery of
people who are making decisions at the State Department. Marginal
experts who cannot be called experts in the full sense of the world
offered a logical scheme of developments over a year ago. Today the
leading experts of the United States, United Kingdom and France are
at a loss and admit their "incompetency". And only specialists of
the Department of State know how to act.
The main mistake was that it was possible to agree with Bashar Assad
anything except two things which hardly worried the Americans (he and
others in his team were ready for that, for a lot, which was told
to Nicolas Sarkozy during his visit to Paris). They refused that,
expecting easier ways of resolving problems. Soon Francois Hollande
came to rescue of the American president-misunderstanding Obama, his
French copy, and it was no longer boring in this company. Francois
Hollande's policy was classics of betrayal of fundamental French
interests in the Near East.
In fact, there is "order" and "agreement" in this game, namely the
West has made up its mind to achieve new systemic positions in the
Arab world by doing such a considerable favor to Saudi Arabia and
its satellites. It ended up in utter failure of "agreements", so on
the eve of the international conference on Syria the United States
is trying to save at least its face, if not the Syrian opposition or
more exactly the Saudi mercenaries.
Who is to blame for the failure of the American politics if not Barack
Obama's marginal team? America is resting. The American people are
waiting for the Republicans to come, no matter in whose face, to save
this country and a lot more other things in the world.
Igor Muradyan 15:10 17/06/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/politics/view/30186