Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can A Turkish, Armenian And Kurdish Picture Be Taken Together?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Can A Turkish, Armenian And Kurdish Picture Be Taken Together?

    CAN A TURKISH, ARMENIAN AND KURDISH PICTURE BE TAKEN TOGETHER?

    11:27, June 20, 2013
    By Solin Hacador

    (The following appeared in the June 18 edition of The Kurdistan
    Tribune)

    Today, I have seen a picture of three women from different ethnicities
    - Kurdish, Armenian and Turkish - taken in the Ottoman times of
    Turkey. I wonder whether the same kind of photo could be taken in
    the current Turkish society.

    Unfortunately, people's understanding of friendship between different
    ethnicities in Turkish society is very thin. Moreover, it is at its
    racist-provocative stage.

    Non-Turkish people cannot openly state their ethnicity, and they
    often hide their origin from each other. This unpleasant situation is
    worrying. Through this picture we can see that different ethnicities
    could set up friendship easily in the past but now it is quite hard to
    bring these people together. This situation did not happen overnight;
    it happened as a result of Turkish long-term racist educational
    system and massacres, genocide against Armenians and massacres against
    Kurdish people.

    Kids from an early age are being taught Ataturk's theories. They
    are taught how to be proud of being Turk. Children from different
    ethnicities are being kept under the same educational system.

    This issue is supported by Turkish media. The media usually follows a
    biased approach towards other ethnicities and independent journalists
    are mostly scared to criticize any governmental mistakes.

    If we go back to the Ottoman Empire, in the sixteen century it was
    the most powerful state but, by the nineteenth century, its power was
    reduced and it had lost most of its land in Africa and Europe. This
    created economic and political losses too and the Empire started to
    pressurise internal ethnicities enormously. Armenian people within the
    government were treated suspiciously. Non-Muslim people were put under
    immense pressure. A series of massacres against Armenians took place
    during Sultan Abdulhamid II (1876-1909)'s administration. The same
    Sultan also used some Kurdish people by setting up the Hamidiye corps
    (literally meaning "belonging to Hamid", with the full official name
    of Hamidiye Hafif Suvari alayları, Hamidiye Light Cavalry Regiments)
    in 1890.

    These were well armed, irregular Sunni Kurdish, Turkish, Turkmen,
    Yöruk and also Arab cavalry formations that operated in the eastern
    provinces of the Ottoman Empire. The intention of Sultan Abdul Hamid
    II was to use this corps against Russia. However, the Hamidiye were
    more often used by the Ottoman authorities to harass and assault
    Armenians living in Western Armenia.

    We Kurds need to accept what has happened in history and the fact
    that some Kurds under the Hamidiye Alaylari took part in massacring
    Armenian. This shameful crime against Armenians was ordered as
    explained above. However, we should not generalise this crime and must
    not blame all Kurds for it. We all know that this is a tactic of the
    Ottoman-Turkish state, and so the state from time to time applies an
    armed group against Kurdish armed revolutionists. We know that the
    village guard (Kurdish armed group) was set up by the Turkish state
    in order to fight against the PKK (Kurdish Workers Party) but they
    were usually used against innocent civilians.

    Finally, the Armenian Genocide (1915) hugely damaged Turkish, Armenian
    and Kurdish friendship.

    Some people become alarmed because they are not very aware of their
    friend's customs, likes and dislikes. They may unwittingly say or do
    something that is offensive, without ever knowing the reason. Having
    this awareness does not mean that you have ever been a person who has
    harboured prejudice or racist thoughts about people from other ethnic,
    national or cultural backgrounds.

    Many contemporary writers in the west tend to present friendship as
    private, voluntary, and happening between autonomous individuals.

    According to this view, 'friendship becomes a special relationship
    between two equal individuals involved in a uniquely constituted
    dyad' (Bell and Coleman 1999). This contrasts in key respects with
    the classical view. Furthermore, as Graham Allan (1989) has argued,
    relationships that are often presented as voluntary, informal and
    personal, still operate within the constraints of class, gender,
    age, ethnicity and geography and this places a considerable question
    against the idea that friendship is a matter of choice.

    Aristotle provides us with one of the great discussions of friendship.

    He distinguishes between what he believes to be genuine friendships
    and two other forms: one based on mutual usefulness, the other on
    pleasure. These two forms only last for as long as there is utility
    and pleasure involved, whereas genuine friendship does not dissolve.

    I personally believe that we need to work on this and do our bit to
    get rid of any errors or unpleasant issues from our society in order
    to set up Turkish, Armenian and Kurdish friendship. This issue is very
    important for the peace process which we need to start from scratch.

    The Turkish state should also get rid of its racist educational
    system and bring its citizens together through social, economic and
    cultural reforms and respect for the rights of individuals. I assume
    a new picture of three ethnicities can be taken by then.

    http://hetq.am/eng/opinion/27521/can-a-turkish-armenian-and-kurdish-picture-be-taken-together?.html

Working...
X