Tweet
HENRIK IS THE VICTIM OF THREE OLIGARCHS
The English Mirror reports that Henrik Mkhitaryan's transfer to
Liverpool derailed by troubling questions over his ownership. There
was information earlier that Mkhitaryan was in Vienna waiting for news.
This story on Mkhitaryan's transfer is really vague. Mkhitaryan was the
first football player from Armenia who could play in an international
club in a high championship.
As we know, the right to Mkhitaryan's transfer belongs not only to
Shakhtar Donetsk but also to Oleg Lazarian, who owns Metalurg Donetsk
and Kuban Krasnodar. Oleg Lazarian is in friendly relations with
the chairman of Armenian football federation Ruben Hairapetyan. Ruben
Hairapetyan also has rights to Mkhitaryan's transfer since he is the
owner of Pyunik football club.
Against this background, it is interesting that in the meantime
the process of Mkhitaryan's transfer to Liverpool was going on,
the chairman of Football Federation of Armenia, Ruben Hairepatyen,
decided to meet with representatives of social networks and blogs to
speak about the bad atmosphere in the national team and Mkhitaryan's
guilt in it. We can only guess why Ruben Hairapetyan, who has the
right to Mkhitaryan's transfer, decides to spread information harming
his reputation.
FF chairman is presenting Mkhitaryan as a presumptuous football player,
who thinks he is higher than the other players of the national team
of Armenia. Do you think any club intending to buy Henrik would be
happy with such a description or it will become more cautious?
Would such a description increase or decrease Henrik's transfer price?
Which club would like to buy a football player who is described as
a conflict and presumptuous person?
It is strange that this description is voiced in a moment when the
transfer issue is decided and it is issued by the head of Football
Federation who is presumed to be interested in the transfer since
he owns the right to it. Ruben Hairapetyan is supposed to speak more
positively about Henrik to enhance his transfer price.
What is the reason of spreading negative news about Mkhitaryan at
such a decisive moment? Is the reason the dissatisfaction of Ruben
Hairapetyan and Oleg Lazarian of the deal or their share of it? Is
it Henrik's attempt not to move as his "right holders" want? It is
evident that the FF Chairman and Henrik Mkhitaryan have a conflict.
Here the role of the owner of Shakhtar, RInat Ahmetov is not less:
he is an oligarch of Soviet-Russian type. Henrik is just a victim of
a successful or unsuccessful deal between three oligarchs.
The situation is even sadder because after such statements on the
atmosphere in the national team, not only Henrik but also the whole
team could result victims, in case after the good match vs. Denmark,
the team spirit was high and was a good precondition to overcome
the crisis ahead of the important match with the Czech Republic. If
Armenia wins this match, it will have a real chance to win the second
ticket to the finals.
HAKOB BADALYAN 12:49 21/06/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/society/view/30242
The English Mirror reports that Henrik Mkhitaryan's transfer to
Liverpool derailed by troubling questions over his ownership. There
was information earlier that Mkhitaryan was in Vienna waiting for news.
This story on Mkhitaryan's transfer is really vague. Mkhitaryan was the
first football player from Armenia who could play in an international
club in a high championship.
As we know, the right to Mkhitaryan's transfer belongs not only to
Shakhtar Donetsk but also to Oleg Lazarian, who owns Metalurg Donetsk
and Kuban Krasnodar. Oleg Lazarian is in friendly relations with
the chairman of Armenian football federation Ruben Hairapetyan. Ruben
Hairapetyan also has rights to Mkhitaryan's transfer since he is the
owner of Pyunik football club.
Against this background, it is interesting that in the meantime
the process of Mkhitaryan's transfer to Liverpool was going on,
the chairman of Football Federation of Armenia, Ruben Hairepatyen,
decided to meet with representatives of social networks and blogs to
speak about the bad atmosphere in the national team and Mkhitaryan's
guilt in it. We can only guess why Ruben Hairapetyan, who has the
right to Mkhitaryan's transfer, decides to spread information harming
his reputation.
FF chairman is presenting Mkhitaryan as a presumptuous football player,
who thinks he is higher than the other players of the national team
of Armenia. Do you think any club intending to buy Henrik would be
happy with such a description or it will become more cautious?
Would such a description increase or decrease Henrik's transfer price?
Which club would like to buy a football player who is described as
a conflict and presumptuous person?
It is strange that this description is voiced in a moment when the
transfer issue is decided and it is issued by the head of Football
Federation who is presumed to be interested in the transfer since
he owns the right to it. Ruben Hairapetyan is supposed to speak more
positively about Henrik to enhance his transfer price.
What is the reason of spreading negative news about Mkhitaryan at
such a decisive moment? Is the reason the dissatisfaction of Ruben
Hairapetyan and Oleg Lazarian of the deal or their share of it? Is
it Henrik's attempt not to move as his "right holders" want? It is
evident that the FF Chairman and Henrik Mkhitaryan have a conflict.
Here the role of the owner of Shakhtar, RInat Ahmetov is not less:
he is an oligarch of Soviet-Russian type. Henrik is just a victim of
a successful or unsuccessful deal between three oligarchs.
The situation is even sadder because after such statements on the
atmosphere in the national team, not only Henrik but also the whole
team could result victims, in case after the good match vs. Denmark,
the team spirit was high and was a good precondition to overcome
the crisis ahead of the important match with the Czech Republic. If
Armenia wins this match, it will have a real chance to win the second
ticket to the finals.
HAKOB BADALYAN 12:49 21/06/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/society/view/30242