Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Business In The Offshore Zone

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Business In The Offshore Zone

    BUSINESS IN THE OFFSHORE ZONE

    Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
    June 21 2013

    21 June 2013 - 7:30pm

    David Stepanyan, Yerevan, exclusively to VK

    In Armenia, another scandal has broken out, apparently not increasing
    the rating of the ruling Republican Party of Armenia. After a series
    of high-profile revelations of illegal activities of senior officials
    abusing their official position and, as a rule, members of the party
    of power, the turn came of the unsinkable Prime Minister Tigran
    Sarkisyan ...

    Within just one day the media were full of articles reporting on
    the company WLISPERA HOLDINGS LIMITED registered in the name of the
    Prime Minister in the offshore zone. In this regard, it should be
    recalled that Sarkisian, at least in words, is a staunch advocate
    of separation of business from government, the fight against the
    shadow economy and corruption. However, according to investigative
    journalism by the website hetq.am, the Prime Minister (by the way,
    along with the leader of the Ararat Diocese Archbishop Navasard
    Kchoyan and businessman Ashot Sukiasyan) is one of the shareholders
    of an offshore company registered in Cyprus.

    However, the Prime Minister, speaking to MPs in the parliament, did his
    best to dispel this information, stating that the latter has nothing
    to do with reality. Sargsyan said that the specifics of offshore
    legislation allow almost any person to register a company under any
    name without asking the permission of the latter and generally without
    his knowledge. He also stated categorically that any offshore companies
    are not registered, and no one has such powers. The prime minister
    expressed confidence that such false accusations were used by his many
    enemies "as the ideal method of discrediting", which does not bother
    him, as these are not the first and not the last charges against him.

    According to some rumors in the corridors of power, as there is no
    smoke without fire, even in 2010, Ashot Sukiasyan, under the project
    of turning Armenia into one of the world's centers for diamond cutting
    and polishing, obtained from the "Ameria" bank a loan of $10.7 million
    under the mediation of the Prime Minister, the Minister of Economy
    Nerses Yeritsyan and Archbishop Kchoyan. A pledge for a loan became
    the property of Pailak Hayrapetyan at a total cost of $33 million;
    however, it has been found in Armenia, Sukiasyan has not fulfilled
    a single obligation under the business program, which, however, for
    some reason did not prevent the "Ameria" bank regularly continuing
    to transfer millions to the bank accounts of the Cypriot offshore
    entity, one of which, of course, was the joint brainchild of the
    Prime Minister, the Archbishop and the unfortunate businessman.

    Amazingly, the commercial bank for some reason not only did not control
    the use of funds, but did not stop an allocation of 6 tranches,
    even after Sukiasyan had not fulfilled a single undertaking on
    them. However, many things are becoming clear, given that it was
    Ashot Sukiasyan who was a generous donor to his godfather, Archbishop
    Navasard Kchoyan, giving him, to put it mildly, a not very cheap
    Bentley Continental. The latter, in turn, is known to be a great
    friend of the Prime Minister. It should be noted that, due to his
    "successful" business, Sukiasyan before this transaction owed millions
    not only in Armenia, but also in Russia and even in Africa, and then,
    taking the family, fled to an unknown destination.

    Based on the statements by Pailak Hayrapetyan, you can come to the
    conclusion that it happened and was made possible with the help and
    the patronage of the Prime Minister, the former Minister of Economy
    and the Archbishop of Ararat. However, Kchoyan, of course, described
    the publication of these intriguing data as "false and untrue."

    However, this did not prevent the police from initiating on the basis
    of testimony by Pailak Hayrapetyan in this regard a criminal case,
    in which, however, to this day no one has somehow put forward a single
    charge. The Prime Minister appealed to the Prosecutor General's Office
    with a requirement to "give a legal assessment of this publication
    and to punish those responsible." And the editor of hetq.am said that
    he has all the necessary documents proving the facts mentioned in the
    publication, including the offshore company registration in the name
    of Tigran Sarkisyan.

    Thus, so far no significant reaction to the published facts has
    followed from the Prosecutor General's Office, from the investigating
    authorities, from the police or from the presidential administration.

    Meanwhile, in any other normal country, the fact of the publication
    of such facts would attract the attention of at least all of the
    above authorities, and at best would lead to the resignation of
    the government.

    It is clear that the government is clearly not interested "in the
    slaughter" of Sarkisian and therefore makes every effort to help the
    Prosecutor General's Office in its efforts to "achieve justice." This
    is confirmed by the stubborn silence of information and propaganda
    machine controlled by the Republicans.

    Finally, we turn to the main question - in whose interests could
    the media display information which impacts on the second person in
    the state? Indirectly, this question could be answered by patronage
    exercised by the U.S. Embassy in Armenia to the resources of hetq.am
    engaged in investigative journalism. However, given that the presence
    of Prime Minister Sargsyan of Armenia in a chair not just pleases but
    is visibly supported by the U.S., this information leak is unlikely
    to be carried out by the States.

    In turn, Moscow, if desired, could probably find more loyal and
    reliable sources of leaking than a pro-Western resource. Thus, most
    of all, Sarkisian has become a "victim" of squabbles and intrigues
    within the Republican Party, not pleasing someone from the members
    of the "Politburo." Given that the activities of the "top" are not
    accountable to the public and are not focused on solving the problems
    of the citizens but on protecting its own or group interests, this
    is the most likely scenario.

    http://vestnikkavkaza.net/articles/politics/41759.html

Working...
X