Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Thomas De Waal: Armenia'S Problem Was Not So Much Election Day As Th

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Thomas De Waal: Armenia'S Problem Was Not So Much Election Day As Th

    THOMAS DE WAAL: ARMENIA'S PROBLEM WAS NOT SO MUCH ELECTION DAY AS THE PLAYING FIELD ITSELF

    ARMINFO
    Tuesday, March 12, 19:05

    After a period of dormancy, politics is back to the countries of the
    South Caucasus, Thomas de Waal, a senior associate at the Russia and
    Eurasia Program of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in
    Washington DC, says in his article "Political Tremors in the Caucasus".

    The countries of the South Caucasus - Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia -
    experienced mass political turbulence in the 1990s, but for years it
    looked as though people had lost faith in public engagement and were
    content to tolerate any ruler who guaranteed a modicum of stability.

    That is no longer the case: After a period of dormancy, politics is
    back, Waal says.

    "Now the country under the spotlight is tiny Armenia. The country held
    a presidential election on February 18 in which serving president
    Serzh Sargsyan was elected to a new five-year term. An easy victory
    for Sargsyan appeared pre- ordained as two other presumed rivals
    dropped out of the race. But in the last two weeks of the campaign,
    opposition candidate Raffi Hovannisian, independent Armenia's first
    foreign minister, surged forward", he says. "Had the campaign lasted
    two weeks longer it is quite possible that Hovannisian's momentum
    would have carried him into a second round run-off", he says.

    "Armenia's problem was not so much election day as the playing field
    itself: A media heavily controlled by the government, local officials
    serving the narrow ruling elite rather than the state as such. The
    head of the OSCE election observer mission, Heidi Tagliavini, picked
    up on this when she commented on "the blurring of the distinction
    between the state and the ruling party", Waal says.

    "Raffi Hovannisian is a decent man, unsullied by the corrupt practices
    of post- Soviet politics. But he is also a California-born outsider
    whom few imagined could be president of Armenia. Evidently, he has
    mobilized a protest vote that is bigger than himself. Hovannisian
    himself has not recognized the result, and he has been surprisingly
    effective at organizing mass rallies across the country. But it is
    hard to see how he can prevail in the short term against a president
    who now has international legitimacy and controls all the levers of
    power in Armenia", he stresses.

    "Over the longer term, however, the president has a problem. Opinion
    surveys show high levels of discontent in Armenia about corruption,
    poverty, and abuse of power. This manifests itself in mediocre economic
    performance and a continuing brain-drain from emigration.

    Sargsyan is a man of consensus who likes at least to listen to his
    opponents. If he does not want a very long and bumpy second term,
    he must now think about what steps he can take that will meet the
    population's discontents half-way - while he knows that tinkering
    with the system may end up undermining his own authority", Waal says.

    Thomas de Waal thinks that as president of a nation whose compatriots
    are scattered across the world, Sargsyan also faces the challenge of
    continued competition with the Armenian diaspora.

Working...
X