Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: The Turkish Destiny

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: The Turkish Destiny

    Hurriyet Daily News, Turkey
    May 3 2013


    THE TURKISH DESTINY

    by BURAK BEKDÄ°L

    "This is the beginning of a long way, of walking together, hand in
    hand and shoulder to shoulder."

    This is not how Turkish leaders viewed their country's long march
    toward Europe half a century ago. This is how Turkish leaders view
    their country's march of unknown length toward Asia in the year 2013.

    The trouble about bridges is that they can hardly fully belong to
    one soil, or walk in either of the directions they bridge.

    With the choice of European Union membership, Turkey declared that
    its destiny would be the destiny of the EU countries. After Turkey
    signed up to become a dialogue partner of the Shanghai Cooperation
    Organization (SCO), Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said: "With
    this choice, Turkey is declaring that our destiny is the same as the
    destiny of the SCO countries."

    Precisely! Though, not entirely. Turkey's useful-and-disposable idiots
    can always busy themselves with liberal dreams of various shades of
    pinky colors, but the foreign policy master has put it very plainly,
    apart from his historic pledge to walk together, hand in hand and
    shoulder to shoulder with a grouping of countries, when he said:
    "Turkey will be part of a family which is composed of the countries
    which lived together for not centuries - for millennia."

    If one cannot respect Dr. Davutoglu's precision about the Turkic-Asian
    history, one should respect, at least, his good intentions. From the
    foreign minister's words we understand that Ankara is only too happy
    to have been granted a diplomatic status - SCO's dialogue partner -
    earned long before by two other nations with which the Turks "hope
    to walk hand in hand and shoulder to shoulder." These lucky nations
    are Belarus and Sri Lanka.

    But Turkish ambitions are certainly higher than that. Such as
    "being part of a family which is composed of countries which have
    lived together not for centuries - but for millennia." The dialogue
    partner status was a perfect first step to join the family. But there
    is one level higher than dialogue partner before one could really
    wholeheartedly embrace the family members: observer status.

    Having successfully passed the first but crucial step of earning
    the dialogue partner status, Turkey hopes to win observer status in
    the SCO. When it has achieved that prestigious status, Turkey will
    join the family members being kept in the antechamber: India, Iran,
    Pakistan, Afghanistan and Mongolia (since dialogue partner status
    held by Belarus and Sri Lanka is below that of observer status held
    by India, Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Mongolia).

    Finally, Turkey hopes to officially become a member of the security
    bloc dominated by Russia and China: the forefathers of a family which
    has lived together not for centuries - but for millennia.

    The foreign minister's rhetoric is perfectly honest and realistic - at
    least more honest than any fancier word by any useful-and-disposable
    idiot around. But allow me repeat for the useful-and-disposable
    idiot's ear what the foreign minister had to say:

    1- Turkey has chosen to become a dialogue partner of the SCO;

    2- This choice means that Turkey's destiny is - hopefully - the same
    as the destiny of the SCO member states;

    3- In the near future, hopefully, Turkey will win the status higher
    than the one it now has and is held by India, Iran, Pakistan,
    Afghanistan and Mongolia;

    4- Turkey, Sri Lanka, Belarus, India, Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan,
    Mongolia, China, Russia, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan are
    a family of countries which have lived together not for centuries -
    but for millennia.

    That's fine. But probably bad news for fans who have the habit of
    accusing me of having crypto-Armenian, -Greek and -Jewish (and
    sometimes Kurdish) descent. Did you, gentlemen, know before the
    minister's Kodak-moment words that you had Sri Lankan, Chinese,
    Russian, Belarusian, Iranian, Indian, Pakistani, Afghan, Mongolian,
    Tajik, Uzbek, Kazakh and Kyrgyz descent? And not so crypto either.

    May/03/2013

    http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/the-turkish-destiny.aspx?pageID=449&nID=46123&NewsCatID=398




    From: A. Papazian
Working...
X