Tweet
COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS and ARMENIA (AGENDAS)
- May 15, 2013
There are many that believe there is a higher organized power
formulating the policies, direction and destiny of America,
independent of either the Democratic or Republican parties for
governing America. It is an organization consisting of approximately
3,000 members called `The Council on Foreign Relations.' It receives
a minimal amount of publicity, which is the cause for the lack of
awareness by the average American. It was formed in July 29, 1921 by
a group of `intellectuals' who felt that there was a need for a world
government, devoid of nations.
Up until America's entry into World War I (April of 1917), the
American people had followed the wise advice of President George
Washington given in his farewell address delivered to the nation in
September 1796. President Washington said: `It is our true policy to
stay clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign
world.... why, should we inter-weave our destiny with that of any part
of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European
ambition, rivalry, interest, humour or caprice?' Washington
understood that interference into other nations' internal affairs
would also create enemies and hatred of America.
In direct repudiation of Washington's warning, Secretary of State
William Jennings Bryan and others, during Woodrow Wilson's
administration (April of 1917), manipulated America's involvement into
World War I as a prelude to conditioning the American public for
foreign interventions. World War I became an excellent opportunity for
the newly formed Council on Foreign Relations to begin promoting
`WORLD GOVERNMENT' as being a desirable solution to the `problems' of
the world. In 1920 the British cousin of the CFR, The Royal Institute
for International Affairs (RIIA) was created in England.
Another reason the Council on Foreign Relations is not very well known
to the American people is because of Article II of the by-laws. This
article requires that the meetings of the membership remain secret,
and anyone releasing the contents of these meetings is subject to
instant dismissal. The CFR's official publication is called `Foreign
Affairs.' It is not printed for national consumption, but rather
within their semi-secret membership as well as academic circles and
think tanks.
Secretly Operated
The Council repeatedly denies that it sets policy for the United
States. Yet, while discussing America's changing foreign policy, CFR
Chairman Peter G. Peterson stated in the organization's 1989 Annual
Report: `The Board of Directors and the staff of the Council have
decided that this institution should play a leadership role in
defining these new foreign policy agendas.'
The question is simple: How can an organization define an agenda for
the nation without taking a stand or advocating a policy? The answer
is, that it can't. Any claim from the CFR, that it is merely a
debating forum open to all ideas is absurd. Richard Harwood, a
Washington Post columnist, wrote in an article that the CFR
journalists he listed `do not merely analyze and interpret foreign
policy; they help make it.'
No CFR member is ever directly instructed to hold any particular view.
Instead, government officials and media personalities supply important
respectability for favored positions, and render varying degrees of
disdain or contempt for the opposite view. Ambitious politicians,
journalists, corporate executives, professors, and others, dutifully
follow the lead set for them - frequently without ever knowing whose
attitude they are parroting. In this way, an agenda is indeed set and
policies are established.
Radio Free Europe (RFE)
Radio Free Europe was broadcasting freedom into Armenia in December
2001 by a certain Max Liberty promoting bisexualism, porn stars, and
religious cults, as well as advising young Armenian youth to practice
free sex (Azg, December 10, 2001). This is only one of many ways to
destabilize a culture that does not deserve to be destabilized. The
United States Government finances Radio Free Europe, but individuals
operate R.F.E. with their personal agendas. Did not the Armenian
Government notice this contamination of Armenia's culture? What was
the Armenian Government doing to protect its national character? Why
didn't the Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanian file an official complaint
to America's State Department? All he said on July 2, 2007 was, 'I
hope that a solution will be found as a result of which Radio Liberty
will continue its broadcasts in Armenia.'
Council of Europe (CE)
After the Armenian Government anxiously became a member, the Council
of Europe's Secretary-General Walter Schwimmer classified Armenia as a
`nation at war' and threatened them to conclude an agreement with
Azerbaijan regarding Nagorno Karabagh (Arminfo - Yerevan - June 2002).
Now, how can Armenia be at war since there had been no hostilities for
seven years? Didn't the leadership of Hayastan realize that once
becoming a member of a globalist entity they would lose control of
their governance? Walter Schwimmer also said, `We live in a century of
globalization and the closure of borders is a natural disaster for
everybody (Arminfo - Yerevan - July 2, 2002).'
The question becomes: Why is the head of the Council of Europe so
concerned about Armenia's borders? Regarding borders, history has
shown that others have always determined Armenia's borders. If Mr.
Schwimmer were concerned about Hayastan's future, he would not have
been identifying it as a `pupil' and, `is moving in the right
direction.' Since Mr. Schwimmer had been chairman of the
Inter-Parliamentary Union Friendship Group Austria-Israel of the
Austrian Parliament from 1976 to 1999, could he not convince the
Israeli Government to cease training the Azerbaijanarmed forces?
`Israel in high level bid for Azerbaijan projects' (Jane's Defence
Weekly 12-22-99). Is Mr. Schwimmer going to govern Hayastan, or are
the Armenian people going to govern themselves? Armenia can and
should relate to Europe, but not be dictated to by the Council of
Europe.
In the Mediamax news release dated October 21, 2003, Vardan Oskanian
was quoted as saying: `First of all, it is necessary for society to
realize the fact that Armenia is part of Europe, and integration has
no alternatives.' Of course, that is only Oskanian's personal opinion.
Vardan Oskanian is a product of Tufts University Fletcher School of
International Affairs, located in Medford, Massachusetts U.S.A.
Fletcher is a school of ONE WORLD BRAINWASHING. Its Web site states:
`TheFletcher School is an institution whose holistic approach prepares
its students to be global leaders.'
During the time Oskanian was foreign minister he was sending twelve
Armenian students each year, to Tufts University. The purpose was to
establish in Armenia continuity of the one world mentality. Result;
Not one iota of patriotism to be propagated. In reality, Oskanian does
not understand patriotism
Mr. Oskanian portrays America and the west as the greatest example
that Armenia could emulate. He is correct. That was 100 years ago,
when America was a pristine nation, loved and respected throughout the
world. What he does not know, and does not want to know, is that
today's America has been transformed into a cultural cesspool. Its
news media has been captured and controlled by a common mind molding
entity. Military bases exist in 150 countries. Constantly creating
foreign wars of destruction and domination, while financially
bankrupting the nation.
While Armenia's government leaders were manipulating a country which
was classed 88 of 158 of the world's most corrupt nations (Iceland 9.7
best;Armenia 2.9; Chad 1.7 worst), Armenia's leaders became
multi-millionaires while imprisoning patriots who had fought in
Kharabagh. Over one million citizens have left the country since 1990.
All this, while Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanian was in his glory
spewing his destructive dreams of `ONE WORLDISM' for Armenia.
The primary reason Armenia's strength has been diluted thorough-out
history, is because of Vardan Oskanians throughout the centuries.
Vardan Oskanian should return to his (advanced nation, America) and
take his Civilitas Foundation along with him, so that Armenia will be
a little less contaminated.
Ardavast Avakian
October 2, 2008
http://www.armenianlife.com/2013/05/15/council-on-foreign-relations-and-armenia-agendas/
From: A. Papazian
- May 15, 2013
There are many that believe there is a higher organized power
formulating the policies, direction and destiny of America,
independent of either the Democratic or Republican parties for
governing America. It is an organization consisting of approximately
3,000 members called `The Council on Foreign Relations.' It receives
a minimal amount of publicity, which is the cause for the lack of
awareness by the average American. It was formed in July 29, 1921 by
a group of `intellectuals' who felt that there was a need for a world
government, devoid of nations.
Up until America's entry into World War I (April of 1917), the
American people had followed the wise advice of President George
Washington given in his farewell address delivered to the nation in
September 1796. President Washington said: `It is our true policy to
stay clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign
world.... why, should we inter-weave our destiny with that of any part
of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European
ambition, rivalry, interest, humour or caprice?' Washington
understood that interference into other nations' internal affairs
would also create enemies and hatred of America.
In direct repudiation of Washington's warning, Secretary of State
William Jennings Bryan and others, during Woodrow Wilson's
administration (April of 1917), manipulated America's involvement into
World War I as a prelude to conditioning the American public for
foreign interventions. World War I became an excellent opportunity for
the newly formed Council on Foreign Relations to begin promoting
`WORLD GOVERNMENT' as being a desirable solution to the `problems' of
the world. In 1920 the British cousin of the CFR, The Royal Institute
for International Affairs (RIIA) was created in England.
Another reason the Council on Foreign Relations is not very well known
to the American people is because of Article II of the by-laws. This
article requires that the meetings of the membership remain secret,
and anyone releasing the contents of these meetings is subject to
instant dismissal. The CFR's official publication is called `Foreign
Affairs.' It is not printed for national consumption, but rather
within their semi-secret membership as well as academic circles and
think tanks.
Secretly Operated
The Council repeatedly denies that it sets policy for the United
States. Yet, while discussing America's changing foreign policy, CFR
Chairman Peter G. Peterson stated in the organization's 1989 Annual
Report: `The Board of Directors and the staff of the Council have
decided that this institution should play a leadership role in
defining these new foreign policy agendas.'
The question is simple: How can an organization define an agenda for
the nation without taking a stand or advocating a policy? The answer
is, that it can't. Any claim from the CFR, that it is merely a
debating forum open to all ideas is absurd. Richard Harwood, a
Washington Post columnist, wrote in an article that the CFR
journalists he listed `do not merely analyze and interpret foreign
policy; they help make it.'
No CFR member is ever directly instructed to hold any particular view.
Instead, government officials and media personalities supply important
respectability for favored positions, and render varying degrees of
disdain or contempt for the opposite view. Ambitious politicians,
journalists, corporate executives, professors, and others, dutifully
follow the lead set for them - frequently without ever knowing whose
attitude they are parroting. In this way, an agenda is indeed set and
policies are established.
Radio Free Europe (RFE)
Radio Free Europe was broadcasting freedom into Armenia in December
2001 by a certain Max Liberty promoting bisexualism, porn stars, and
religious cults, as well as advising young Armenian youth to practice
free sex (Azg, December 10, 2001). This is only one of many ways to
destabilize a culture that does not deserve to be destabilized. The
United States Government finances Radio Free Europe, but individuals
operate R.F.E. with their personal agendas. Did not the Armenian
Government notice this contamination of Armenia's culture? What was
the Armenian Government doing to protect its national character? Why
didn't the Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanian file an official complaint
to America's State Department? All he said on July 2, 2007 was, 'I
hope that a solution will be found as a result of which Radio Liberty
will continue its broadcasts in Armenia.'
Council of Europe (CE)
After the Armenian Government anxiously became a member, the Council
of Europe's Secretary-General Walter Schwimmer classified Armenia as a
`nation at war' and threatened them to conclude an agreement with
Azerbaijan regarding Nagorno Karabagh (Arminfo - Yerevan - June 2002).
Now, how can Armenia be at war since there had been no hostilities for
seven years? Didn't the leadership of Hayastan realize that once
becoming a member of a globalist entity they would lose control of
their governance? Walter Schwimmer also said, `We live in a century of
globalization and the closure of borders is a natural disaster for
everybody (Arminfo - Yerevan - July 2, 2002).'
The question becomes: Why is the head of the Council of Europe so
concerned about Armenia's borders? Regarding borders, history has
shown that others have always determined Armenia's borders. If Mr.
Schwimmer were concerned about Hayastan's future, he would not have
been identifying it as a `pupil' and, `is moving in the right
direction.' Since Mr. Schwimmer had been chairman of the
Inter-Parliamentary Union Friendship Group Austria-Israel of the
Austrian Parliament from 1976 to 1999, could he not convince the
Israeli Government to cease training the Azerbaijanarmed forces?
`Israel in high level bid for Azerbaijan projects' (Jane's Defence
Weekly 12-22-99). Is Mr. Schwimmer going to govern Hayastan, or are
the Armenian people going to govern themselves? Armenia can and
should relate to Europe, but not be dictated to by the Council of
Europe.
In the Mediamax news release dated October 21, 2003, Vardan Oskanian
was quoted as saying: `First of all, it is necessary for society to
realize the fact that Armenia is part of Europe, and integration has
no alternatives.' Of course, that is only Oskanian's personal opinion.
Vardan Oskanian is a product of Tufts University Fletcher School of
International Affairs, located in Medford, Massachusetts U.S.A.
Fletcher is a school of ONE WORLD BRAINWASHING. Its Web site states:
`TheFletcher School is an institution whose holistic approach prepares
its students to be global leaders.'
During the time Oskanian was foreign minister he was sending twelve
Armenian students each year, to Tufts University. The purpose was to
establish in Armenia continuity of the one world mentality. Result;
Not one iota of patriotism to be propagated. In reality, Oskanian does
not understand patriotism
Mr. Oskanian portrays America and the west as the greatest example
that Armenia could emulate. He is correct. That was 100 years ago,
when America was a pristine nation, loved and respected throughout the
world. What he does not know, and does not want to know, is that
today's America has been transformed into a cultural cesspool. Its
news media has been captured and controlled by a common mind molding
entity. Military bases exist in 150 countries. Constantly creating
foreign wars of destruction and domination, while financially
bankrupting the nation.
While Armenia's government leaders were manipulating a country which
was classed 88 of 158 of the world's most corrupt nations (Iceland 9.7
best;Armenia 2.9; Chad 1.7 worst), Armenia's leaders became
multi-millionaires while imprisoning patriots who had fought in
Kharabagh. Over one million citizens have left the country since 1990.
All this, while Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanian was in his glory
spewing his destructive dreams of `ONE WORLDISM' for Armenia.
The primary reason Armenia's strength has been diluted thorough-out
history, is because of Vardan Oskanians throughout the centuries.
Vardan Oskanian should return to his (advanced nation, America) and
take his Civilitas Foundation along with him, so that Armenia will be
a little less contaminated.
Ardavast Avakian
October 2, 2008
http://www.armenianlife.com/2013/05/15/council-on-foreign-relations-and-armenia-agendas/
From: A. Papazian