Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: Living by the 'de jure' sword

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: Living by the 'de jure' sword

    Hurriyet Daily News, Turkey
    May 24 2013


    Living by the 'de jure' sword

    by Burak bekdil

    Islamists often - but not always - come in two flavors: Those who
    would decapitate an infidel, take out his heart and eat it in front of
    cameras, like the "freedom fighter" in Syria; and those who have the
    same sentiments and goals but pursue smarter means to Islamize the
    whole universe, including "lesser Muslims," through "de jure" methods.
    The most preferred de jure methodology is "majoritarianism."

    Turkey is the world's best example of how smartly smarter Islamists
    function - and how de jure! On April 15, 2013, the world-renowned
    Turkish pianist Fazil Say was sentenced to a 10-month suspended prison
    sentence for tweeting and retweeting words that some Muslims, all
    Islamists and "independent" judges thought insulted Muslims and their
    faith.

    A couple of days ago, Turkish-Armenian linguist and former columnist
    Sevan Nisanyan was condemned to 13 months in prison (not suspended)
    for alleged blasphemy against Muslims in a blog comment.

    Mr Nisanyan's "Hrant Dink-style" conviction came on the same day a
    parliamentary commission, with the majority of votes from the ruling
    Justice and Development Party (AKP) deputies, passed new restrictions
    on the sale and consumption of alcohol, the Islamists' nemesis
    beverage.

    As this column was written, the lawyer and women's rights activist
    Canan Arin was awaiting trial which could put her in jail for five
    years because, in a conference speech on "child brides," she had
    criticized the Prophet Muhammad for marrying, according to some
    accounts, a 9-year-old, and President Abdullah Gul, for marrying,
    according to official accounts, a 15-year-old. Mrs Arin has been
    prosecuted for "denigrating the values embraced by all or a part of
    the society," and for "insulting the president."

    Ironically, this trial takes place in a country where the government,
    in rhetoric, has launched a campaign against child brides. Turkey
    looks like a lost soul: Marrying a 15-year-old girl is normal but the
    government fights underage marriages and an activist who criticizes
    child marriages faces a five-year prison sentence!

    Fortunately, criticizing rape or sexual harassment has not yet fallen
    into the catalogue of crimes under the heading "denigrating the values
    embraced by all or a part of the society," since Turkish criminal
    statistics show that quite a number of Turks have embraced both as
    their values.

    Only a few weeks before the inflow of "halal courtroom news," a
    Turkish sociologist had likened atheism to autism, not because both
    words start with an "a" and end with the suffix "ism," but because he
    believed that autistic children cannot go to heaven. The professor,
    who happens to be the chairman of an association that should provide
    care and education for autistic children, even proudly unveiled his
    plans to provide therapy for autistic children "so that they could
    become faithful children." In a saner country, of course, the
    sociologist would have been forced to have therapy "so that he could
    become a saner scientist" - if not arrested for child abuse.

    And three days ago, Mahmut Macit, a senior member of AKP's Ankara
    provincial board, flared up about insults against believers with a
    tweet that read: "My blood boils when spineless psychopaths pretending
    to be atheists swear at my religion. These raped types should be
    annihilated."

    Mr Macit probably falls into the third category of Islamists: Those
    Islamists who officially belong to the second category but cannot hide
    their true sentiments that they actually belong to the first category.

    You may dislike Mr Macit, or condemn him for his remarks which no
    prosecutor will think "denigrate the values embraced by all or a part
    of the society." But at least you must thank him for being honest
    while his second-category peers quietly praise him, even while
    publicly denouncing him.

Working...
X