Tweet
AUTHOR OF ANTI-ARMENIAN BOOK IS STILL CAUGHT ON LIES AND DISINFORMATION
18:19 30/10/2013 " REGION
After yesterday's scandal over the presentation of the book written
by Russian historian Oleg Kuznetsov titled "Truth about "myths"
of Karabakh conflict", the author hastily gave an interview to the
Azerbaijani news agency "Vesti.az." At the presentation of the book
the author was accused of falsifying facts about the history of
the Armenian people. As a result in front of numerous cameras and
reporters he admitted his being pro-Azerbaijani bias.
In an interview given to Azerbaijani media Kuznetsov, who has
repeatedly been convicted of disinformation, continues lying. In
particular, he claims that after the end of the presentation he had
a talk with the editor of "Wikipedia" Vadim Gomoz, who had previously
caught him in alleged frauds, and had come to a consensus with him.
Gomoz on his Facebook page has refuted Kuznetsov's words which as if
refer to him.
"In connection with strange statements of Mr. Kuznetsov, I officially
declare that, there where it says: "After the event I was able to
talk with Vadim, and he left a very good impression on me," should
be understood as "Vadim asked me for an autograph on the book."
There where Kuznetsov says: "Vadim Gomoz did not deny the fact
that Stanislav Tarasov, willingly or unwillingly, was engaged in
falsification of historical documents" and then till the end of the
paragraph should be understood as "Vadim Gomoz denied this fact,
because this issue was not discussed with the Mr. Kuznetsov at all."
There where Kuznetsov says: "In fact, Vadim Gomoz agreed with me
that every Russian citizen has the right to be an Armenophil, but in
the same time he/she should not violate the national law, as Alexey
Martynov does" should be understood as "Vadim Gomoz considers Mr.
Kuznetsov's actions demanding to use the law on foreign agents as a
political denunciation."
Vadim Gomoz also continues revealing absurd bloopers from historian
Oleg Kuznetsov's statements. The latter gets confused and makes
mistakes in elementary historical events and dates. Thus, in the
video posted on YouTube on the 12th minute Kuznetsov, as proof of his
rightness, in a controversy with Gomoz speaks of the projects of the
late 19th - early 20th centuries, including in the list the "Greek
project Bezborodko." However, as noted by Vadim Gomoz, Kuznetsov was
mistaken for 100 years in the date, "Bezborodko was Catherine the
Great's official, the Greek project dates back in 1782."
Gomoz also point out the lapses in Kuznetsov's article, published in
the Azerbaijani propaganda website "erevangala500", where he states:
"Uruguay was the first country in the world to officially recognize
"Armenian genocide" at the parliamentary level in 1965.
However, at this time, Uruguay together with Brazil and Argentina was
engaged in coalition war against Paraguay, during which 90% of adult
men of this country were killed, and its territory was reduced by
one-third. " Gomoz notes that the Paraguayan War took place in 1864
and the journalist could not have mixed it up as Kuznetsov claims
that these events occurred in the same time.
Source: Panorama.am
From: A. Papazian
18:19 30/10/2013 " REGION
After yesterday's scandal over the presentation of the book written
by Russian historian Oleg Kuznetsov titled "Truth about "myths"
of Karabakh conflict", the author hastily gave an interview to the
Azerbaijani news agency "Vesti.az." At the presentation of the book
the author was accused of falsifying facts about the history of
the Armenian people. As a result in front of numerous cameras and
reporters he admitted his being pro-Azerbaijani bias.
In an interview given to Azerbaijani media Kuznetsov, who has
repeatedly been convicted of disinformation, continues lying. In
particular, he claims that after the end of the presentation he had
a talk with the editor of "Wikipedia" Vadim Gomoz, who had previously
caught him in alleged frauds, and had come to a consensus with him.
Gomoz on his Facebook page has refuted Kuznetsov's words which as if
refer to him.
"In connection with strange statements of Mr. Kuznetsov, I officially
declare that, there where it says: "After the event I was able to
talk with Vadim, and he left a very good impression on me," should
be understood as "Vadim asked me for an autograph on the book."
There where Kuznetsov says: "Vadim Gomoz did not deny the fact
that Stanislav Tarasov, willingly or unwillingly, was engaged in
falsification of historical documents" and then till the end of the
paragraph should be understood as "Vadim Gomoz denied this fact,
because this issue was not discussed with the Mr. Kuznetsov at all."
There where Kuznetsov says: "In fact, Vadim Gomoz agreed with me
that every Russian citizen has the right to be an Armenophil, but in
the same time he/she should not violate the national law, as Alexey
Martynov does" should be understood as "Vadim Gomoz considers Mr.
Kuznetsov's actions demanding to use the law on foreign agents as a
political denunciation."
Vadim Gomoz also continues revealing absurd bloopers from historian
Oleg Kuznetsov's statements. The latter gets confused and makes
mistakes in elementary historical events and dates. Thus, in the
video posted on YouTube on the 12th minute Kuznetsov, as proof of his
rightness, in a controversy with Gomoz speaks of the projects of the
late 19th - early 20th centuries, including in the list the "Greek
project Bezborodko." However, as noted by Vadim Gomoz, Kuznetsov was
mistaken for 100 years in the date, "Bezborodko was Catherine the
Great's official, the Greek project dates back in 1782."
Gomoz also point out the lapses in Kuznetsov's article, published in
the Azerbaijani propaganda website "erevangala500", where he states:
"Uruguay was the first country in the world to officially recognize
"Armenian genocide" at the parliamentary level in 1965.
However, at this time, Uruguay together with Brazil and Argentina was
engaged in coalition war against Paraguay, during which 90% of adult
men of this country were killed, and its territory was reduced by
one-third. " Gomoz notes that the Paraguayan War took place in 1864
and the journalist could not have mixed it up as Kuznetsov claims
that these events occurred in the same time.
Source: Panorama.am
From: A. Papazian