FORENSIC DOCTOR CONFIRMED THAT AVETIK BUDAGHYAN WAS SHOT FROM TOP TO DOWN
November 4 2013
"If it was not Surik Khachatryan, who was the one shooting in
the direction from top to bottom?" - this question was raised by
Budaghyan's lawyer Haik Alumyan in the conversation with Aravot.am
assuring that during the incident in Goris there was a shot from the
top of Surik Khachatryan's house, and he was at home. We conveyed
Surik Khachatryan's lawyer Martin Zilfugharyan's explanation that
there was not a shot from top to down, it is only Haik Alumyan's
assumption. Mr. Alumyan answered, "My assumptions, unlike the
assumptions of my much respected Martin Zilfugharyan and Ruben
Sahakyan, are based on the materials of the case. So far, I have not
seen the materials that are the basis of their conviction, if mine
is an assumption." Pursuant to Haik Alumyan's interpretation, one of
Avetik Budaghyan's injuries was around the shoulder and penetrated to
the abdomen, "The direction of this injury was from top to down. It is
said not by me but the forensic doctor. Another injury hit the elbow
joint, but from behind. I am criticized by the supporters of the other
side why I have said that there was an injury from behind. Now, we
do have the conclusion of the forensic doctor that the injury of the
elbow was from back to front. We have one injury from back to front,
which is around the elbow, which means that shooting was made from
behind. There is another shot from top to down, the bullet of which
was found in the abdomen. There are two more physical damages from
front to back: one in the thigh and the other again in the lower part
of the abdomen." Hripsime JEBEJYAN
Read more at: http://en.aravot.am/2013/11/04/162335/
November 4 2013
"If it was not Surik Khachatryan, who was the one shooting in
the direction from top to bottom?" - this question was raised by
Budaghyan's lawyer Haik Alumyan in the conversation with Aravot.am
assuring that during the incident in Goris there was a shot from the
top of Surik Khachatryan's house, and he was at home. We conveyed
Surik Khachatryan's lawyer Martin Zilfugharyan's explanation that
there was not a shot from top to down, it is only Haik Alumyan's
assumption. Mr. Alumyan answered, "My assumptions, unlike the
assumptions of my much respected Martin Zilfugharyan and Ruben
Sahakyan, are based on the materials of the case. So far, I have not
seen the materials that are the basis of their conviction, if mine
is an assumption." Pursuant to Haik Alumyan's interpretation, one of
Avetik Budaghyan's injuries was around the shoulder and penetrated to
the abdomen, "The direction of this injury was from top to down. It is
said not by me but the forensic doctor. Another injury hit the elbow
joint, but from behind. I am criticized by the supporters of the other
side why I have said that there was an injury from behind. Now, we
do have the conclusion of the forensic doctor that the injury of the
elbow was from back to front. We have one injury from back to front,
which is around the elbow, which means that shooting was made from
behind. There is another shot from top to down, the bullet of which
was found in the abdomen. There are two more physical damages from
front to back: one in the thigh and the other again in the lower part
of the abdomen." Hripsime JEBEJYAN
Read more at: http://en.aravot.am/2013/11/04/162335/