Tweet
IS THE WHITE HOUSE SO SCARED OF TURKEY THAT IT WON'T EVEN HANG A RUG?
[ Part 2.2: "Attached Text" ]
POSTED BY J. DANA STUSTER [091022_meta_block.gif] THURSDAY, NOVEMBER
21, 2013 - 9:27 AM [091022_meta_block.gif]
[ghazirrug.jpg]
In 1926, Vartoohi Galezian -- a 15-year-old refugee from the genocide
in Armenia -- arrived at the White House to pay a visit to President
Calvin Coolidge. She had come to view the rug she and 1,400 other
orphans living in Ghazir -- then part of mandate Syria, now in
Lebanon -- had woven as a gift to the United States in thanks for
the humanitarian assistance provided to the refugees of the ethnic
cleansing of Armenians during World War I. In June 1995, the Ghazir
rug, a huge, beautiful work exemplary of the Middle East's legendary
weaving traditions, was shown once more to Galezian and her family,
but it's now been more than 17 years since the White House has
displayed what has come to be known as the Armenian orphan rug. Now
it is unclear when the rug will ever be shown again.
The rug is now caught in a tug-of-war with historians and Armenian
advocates on one side pulling for the rug to be displayed and the
White House on the other, which seems reticent to release the rug for
an exhibit. Many suspect the White House of kowtowing to Turkey, which
refuses to describe the deaths of 1.5 million Armenians as a genocide
and objects to the display of Armenian artifacts -- and the implicit
acknowledgement of Turkey's responsibility in the 20th century's first
large-scale ethnic cleansing. But the rug has powerful supporters,
who are now pushing a White House loathe to antagonise Turkey to put
the rug on display.
As strange as it sounds, the memory of a nearly century-old genocide
is now being litigated over the future fate of a rug.
For a time, it looked like the rug would be shown next month at a
book launch event for a book about the rug's history, but the White
House declined to exhibit it. "We regret that it was not possible to
loan it out for this event," Laura Lucas Magnuson, assistant press
secretary for the National Security Council, told Foreign Policy.
"Displaying the rug for only half a day in connection with a private
book launch event, as proposed, would have been an inappropriate
use of U.S. government property, would have required the White
House to undertake the risk of transporting the rug for limited
public exposure, and was not viewed as commensurate with the rug's
historical significance."
But some suspect the decision was motivated by political expediency
as much as concerns about finding the right setting for the rug. The
rug is a symbol of the expulsion of the collapsing Ottoman Empire's
Armenian population in 1915, which left 1.5 million dead and hundreds
of thousands displaced -- an event that most historians consider
the first genocide of the modern era. The devastating effects of the
deaths and displacement prompted the first concerted effort at U.S.
international humanitarianism with the establishment of Near East
Relief, an early precursor to USAID. But Turkey adamantly denies that
the ethnic cleansing meets the legal definition of genocide, which
requires that the effort to wipe out a population be "deliberate
and systematic," claiming instead that the Armenians were victims
of widespread upheaval in a country in turmoil. The use of the term
"genocide" -- and anything that draws attention to the deportations,
massacres, and death marches -- is a loaded political issue in
relations with Turkey.
"It is very hard to believe that politics doesn't have anything to
do with the White House's abrupt refusal to loan the carpet to the
Smithsonian" for the book launch, said Keith Watenpaugh, a professor
at the University of California, Davis, who has written extensively
about U.S. humanitarianism among Armenian survivors. "This explanation
strikes me as after the fact -- and not terribly persuasive. Artifacts
from official collections are brought out for special occasions all
the time. It is not unusual for meaningful pieces of art or special
documents to be displayed for short periods." Watenpaugh has started
a petition asking for the White House to reconsider displaying the rug.
In a separate effort, 31 members of Congress have sent a letter to
the White House urging it to "release this American treasure for
exhibition" but have not received a response. "If the White House
doesn't release the rug to be shown at the Smithsonian, it's my
intention to put together an event on the Hill at which the rug could
be shown," Rep. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat and a co-author of
the letter, told FP by phone Thursday. That event, which Schiff said
could be held as soon as January, would focus on U.S. humanitarian
efforts and the "circumstances that led to the making of the rug." As
to whether he thought the White House's refusal to show the rug was
motivated by concerns over Turkish sensitivities, Schiff noted that
it would be evident if the White House changes its policy for future
events. "We'll see soon enough," he said.
Regardless of the terminology involved, the rug has a fascinating
history. It was woven by a girls' orphanage in the town of Ghazir,
about 20 miles north of Beirut, that housed 1,400 girls and was
funded through the sale of woven rugs and contributions from Near
East Relief, a U.S. development charity that provided support to
Armenian refugees. The sprawling rug -- 11 by 18 feet -- contains
4,404,206 knots and is intricately patterned with animals, plants,
and arabesques. It was presented to President Coolidge on December 4,
1925, in advance of a Near East Relief donation drive. The rug stayed
in the White House until Coolidge left office, at which point it went
with him to Northampton, Mass. It was passed down through the family
and given back to the White House collection in 1982.
"The Ghazir rug is a reminder of the close relationship between the
peoples of Armenia and the United States," Lucas Magnuson wrote
by email. It is also "a symbol of the immense generosity that the
American people once demonstrated to the children of the Middle East,"
Watenpaugh told FP. "It is a superb work of art and a poignant reminder
of a time when the relationship between America and the Middle East
was much different from today and built around education, humanitarian
relief, and cooperation. Today, as millions more children are suffering
because of the war in Syria, we have the right to remember that
history and an obligation to rekindle our tradition of compassion."
But, for now, that history will stay locked away.
http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/11/21/is_the_white_house_so_scared_
of_turkey_it_wont_even_hang_a_rug
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
[ Part 2.2: "Attached Text" ]
POSTED BY J. DANA STUSTER [091022_meta_block.gif] THURSDAY, NOVEMBER
21, 2013 - 9:27 AM [091022_meta_block.gif]
[ghazirrug.jpg]
In 1926, Vartoohi Galezian -- a 15-year-old refugee from the genocide
in Armenia -- arrived at the White House to pay a visit to President
Calvin Coolidge. She had come to view the rug she and 1,400 other
orphans living in Ghazir -- then part of mandate Syria, now in
Lebanon -- had woven as a gift to the United States in thanks for
the humanitarian assistance provided to the refugees of the ethnic
cleansing of Armenians during World War I. In June 1995, the Ghazir
rug, a huge, beautiful work exemplary of the Middle East's legendary
weaving traditions, was shown once more to Galezian and her family,
but it's now been more than 17 years since the White House has
displayed what has come to be known as the Armenian orphan rug. Now
it is unclear when the rug will ever be shown again.
The rug is now caught in a tug-of-war with historians and Armenian
advocates on one side pulling for the rug to be displayed and the
White House on the other, which seems reticent to release the rug for
an exhibit. Many suspect the White House of kowtowing to Turkey, which
refuses to describe the deaths of 1.5 million Armenians as a genocide
and objects to the display of Armenian artifacts -- and the implicit
acknowledgement of Turkey's responsibility in the 20th century's first
large-scale ethnic cleansing. But the rug has powerful supporters,
who are now pushing a White House loathe to antagonise Turkey to put
the rug on display.
As strange as it sounds, the memory of a nearly century-old genocide
is now being litigated over the future fate of a rug.
For a time, it looked like the rug would be shown next month at a
book launch event for a book about the rug's history, but the White
House declined to exhibit it. "We regret that it was not possible to
loan it out for this event," Laura Lucas Magnuson, assistant press
secretary for the National Security Council, told Foreign Policy.
"Displaying the rug for only half a day in connection with a private
book launch event, as proposed, would have been an inappropriate
use of U.S. government property, would have required the White
House to undertake the risk of transporting the rug for limited
public exposure, and was not viewed as commensurate with the rug's
historical significance."
But some suspect the decision was motivated by political expediency
as much as concerns about finding the right setting for the rug. The
rug is a symbol of the expulsion of the collapsing Ottoman Empire's
Armenian population in 1915, which left 1.5 million dead and hundreds
of thousands displaced -- an event that most historians consider
the first genocide of the modern era. The devastating effects of the
deaths and displacement prompted the first concerted effort at U.S.
international humanitarianism with the establishment of Near East
Relief, an early precursor to USAID. But Turkey adamantly denies that
the ethnic cleansing meets the legal definition of genocide, which
requires that the effort to wipe out a population be "deliberate
and systematic," claiming instead that the Armenians were victims
of widespread upheaval in a country in turmoil. The use of the term
"genocide" -- and anything that draws attention to the deportations,
massacres, and death marches -- is a loaded political issue in
relations with Turkey.
"It is very hard to believe that politics doesn't have anything to
do with the White House's abrupt refusal to loan the carpet to the
Smithsonian" for the book launch, said Keith Watenpaugh, a professor
at the University of California, Davis, who has written extensively
about U.S. humanitarianism among Armenian survivors. "This explanation
strikes me as after the fact -- and not terribly persuasive. Artifacts
from official collections are brought out for special occasions all
the time. It is not unusual for meaningful pieces of art or special
documents to be displayed for short periods." Watenpaugh has started
a petition asking for the White House to reconsider displaying the rug.
In a separate effort, 31 members of Congress have sent a letter to
the White House urging it to "release this American treasure for
exhibition" but have not received a response. "If the White House
doesn't release the rug to be shown at the Smithsonian, it's my
intention to put together an event on the Hill at which the rug could
be shown," Rep. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat and a co-author of
the letter, told FP by phone Thursday. That event, which Schiff said
could be held as soon as January, would focus on U.S. humanitarian
efforts and the "circumstances that led to the making of the rug." As
to whether he thought the White House's refusal to show the rug was
motivated by concerns over Turkish sensitivities, Schiff noted that
it would be evident if the White House changes its policy for future
events. "We'll see soon enough," he said.
Regardless of the terminology involved, the rug has a fascinating
history. It was woven by a girls' orphanage in the town of Ghazir,
about 20 miles north of Beirut, that housed 1,400 girls and was
funded through the sale of woven rugs and contributions from Near
East Relief, a U.S. development charity that provided support to
Armenian refugees. The sprawling rug -- 11 by 18 feet -- contains
4,404,206 knots and is intricately patterned with animals, plants,
and arabesques. It was presented to President Coolidge on December 4,
1925, in advance of a Near East Relief donation drive. The rug stayed
in the White House until Coolidge left office, at which point it went
with him to Northampton, Mass. It was passed down through the family
and given back to the White House collection in 1982.
"The Ghazir rug is a reminder of the close relationship between the
peoples of Armenia and the United States," Lucas Magnuson wrote
by email. It is also "a symbol of the immense generosity that the
American people once demonstrated to the children of the Middle East,"
Watenpaugh told FP. "It is a superb work of art and a poignant reminder
of a time when the relationship between America and the Middle East
was much different from today and built around education, humanitarian
relief, and cooperation. Today, as millions more children are suffering
because of the war in Syria, we have the right to remember that
history and an obligation to rekindle our tradition of compassion."
But, for now, that history will stay locked away.
http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/11/21/is_the_white_house_so_scared_
of_turkey_it_wont_even_hang_a_rug
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress