Tweet
RUSSIA'S INTENTIONS REGARDING ARTSAKH HAVE BEEN REVEALED
As it could be expected, Putin did not respond to Zori Balayan's
letter, and the chief of staff of the Russian president announced
that they have learned about the letter from the press and they see
no need to reply to it.
Why should Putin respond if he does not have such an issue? Zori
Balayan announced that he is not so ingenuous to think that Putin
would read and respond. And certainly Zori Balayan is not ingenuous.
Ingenuous people would never receive 300,000 dollars from the budget
of a country in crisis to go on a voyage round the world.
The author of the letter Zori Balayan did not need Putin's reply. His
letter addresses another issue. It feels the pulse of the society in
Artsakh and Armenia. Putin's reply would only hinder it because what
should the Russian president say? He certainly would not quarrel or
cause problems with the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs, Iran and most
importantly Azerbaijan and Turkey. At the same time, a denying or
indefinite answer would not hinder the initiative of feeling the
pulse either.
The bird has been sent into the air so let it fly. Now Putin has
nothing to do. It's the turn of those who should start announcing
that annexation of Artsakh by Russia is their childhood dream.
On the other hand, the response of the Russian president's
administration prompts that Zori Balayan has thwarted some plan.
Apparently, it was an overdose. At least, the statement that they
learned about the letter from the press is aimed at downgrading the
already low status of the piece of correspondence. The Kremlin has
obviously categorized Zori Balayan's letter among ordinary events
and has reasons for that.
In fact, Zori Balayan has revealed Russia's strategic secrets. In this
regard, it is not ruled out that Balayan did a subversive act against
Russia, revealing something that Russia was trying to achieve through
a series of steps. Hence, Zori Balayan deserves the title of double
hero of Artsakh and a trip round the world for two persons not to
part from Lady Caroline Cox for a long time.
Hardly anyone could explain to the public Russia's military and
political ambitions relating to Artsakh more thoroughly. And if Zori
Balayan had hesitated for a while, it could have been too late, and
what he described and hinted in his letter - annexation of Artsakh
by Russia - could have already come true.
Meanwhile, Obama who has rid of the debt crisis, Hollande who
has passed the chair to Serzh Sargsyan after the Customs Union,
Aliyev preparing placement of the next order to the Russian defense
industry, Rowhani expecting progress in nuclear negotiations with the
international community over six months will ask questions to Putin.
What should Putin answer to all of them, especially in the context of
economic upheavals in Russia? Although Putin could go on to accuse
everyone of pushing Balayan to write the letter intended to corner
Putin. "So you answer Balayan now?" Putin said.
Hakob Badalyan 10:45 18/10/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/31125
From: Baghdasarian
As it could be expected, Putin did not respond to Zori Balayan's
letter, and the chief of staff of the Russian president announced
that they have learned about the letter from the press and they see
no need to reply to it.
Why should Putin respond if he does not have such an issue? Zori
Balayan announced that he is not so ingenuous to think that Putin
would read and respond. And certainly Zori Balayan is not ingenuous.
Ingenuous people would never receive 300,000 dollars from the budget
of a country in crisis to go on a voyage round the world.
The author of the letter Zori Balayan did not need Putin's reply. His
letter addresses another issue. It feels the pulse of the society in
Artsakh and Armenia. Putin's reply would only hinder it because what
should the Russian president say? He certainly would not quarrel or
cause problems with the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs, Iran and most
importantly Azerbaijan and Turkey. At the same time, a denying or
indefinite answer would not hinder the initiative of feeling the
pulse either.
The bird has been sent into the air so let it fly. Now Putin has
nothing to do. It's the turn of those who should start announcing
that annexation of Artsakh by Russia is their childhood dream.
On the other hand, the response of the Russian president's
administration prompts that Zori Balayan has thwarted some plan.
Apparently, it was an overdose. At least, the statement that they
learned about the letter from the press is aimed at downgrading the
already low status of the piece of correspondence. The Kremlin has
obviously categorized Zori Balayan's letter among ordinary events
and has reasons for that.
In fact, Zori Balayan has revealed Russia's strategic secrets. In this
regard, it is not ruled out that Balayan did a subversive act against
Russia, revealing something that Russia was trying to achieve through
a series of steps. Hence, Zori Balayan deserves the title of double
hero of Artsakh and a trip round the world for two persons not to
part from Lady Caroline Cox for a long time.
Hardly anyone could explain to the public Russia's military and
political ambitions relating to Artsakh more thoroughly. And if Zori
Balayan had hesitated for a while, it could have been too late, and
what he described and hinted in his letter - annexation of Artsakh
by Russia - could have already come true.
Meanwhile, Obama who has rid of the debt crisis, Hollande who
has passed the chair to Serzh Sargsyan after the Customs Union,
Aliyev preparing placement of the next order to the Russian defense
industry, Rowhani expecting progress in nuclear negotiations with the
international community over six months will ask questions to Putin.
What should Putin answer to all of them, especially in the context of
economic upheavals in Russia? Although Putin could go on to accuse
everyone of pushing Balayan to write the letter intended to corner
Putin. "So you answer Balayan now?" Putin said.
Hakob Badalyan 10:45 18/10/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/31125
From: Baghdasarian