Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Ivanishvili Leaving in Order To Call Former Government to Justice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is Ivanishvili Leaving in Order To Call Former Government to Justice

    Kviris Palitra, Georgia
    Sept 9 2013

    Is Ivanishvili Leaving in Order To Call Former Government to Justice?

    The following is the text of Giorgi Kvitashvili's interview with
    political analyst Soso Tsiskarishvili

    If you want to find out which subject is topical in Georgia, you
    should take a taxi. You are in trouble if the taxi driver learns that
    you are a journalist because you will have to listen to his political
    observations, as well as questions and conclusions, before you get to
    the destination point: Are things ever going to get better for us?
    However, sometimes even our "political experts" driving taxis make
    very accurate observations. A taxi driver recently told yours truly:
    "I have been a driver since my childhood years and I can look at
    Ivanishvili's move (whether the prime minister will quit politics or
    not is the main subject discussed by the Georgian taxi drivers) from a
    driver's perspective. Imagine driving uphill in mud and there is still
    a long way to go but the driver suddenly opens the door and jumps out
    of a moving car. The car left without a driver will either hit a tree
    or fall off a cliff." This could be a mere joke but the public does
    fear that Ivanishvili's resignation at this point will, in fact, leave
    the country in the condition of a car that is moving fast without a
    driver. We spoke to political analyst Soso Tsiskarishvili about these
    and other topical issues.

    [Tsiskarishvili] I am convinced that a reasonable person like Bidzina
    Ivanishvili will make sure to end the speculations as to what might
    happen after he quits politics. The prime minister also wrote in his
    most recent [open] letter about the prerequisites for his quitting
    politics. I believe that Ivanishvili will not take this step in the
    near future.

    [Kvitashvili] What do you mean by "near future": Several months, a
    year, or two years?

    [Tsiskarishvili] If Bidzina Ivanishvili has Superman's qualities and
    can do two or three years' work in two months, I can only wish him
    good luck. Based on Ivanishvili's letter, I would say that two or
    three months will not be enough to achieve the results that he wants
    to achieve before quitting politics.

    [Kvitashvili] So, Ivanishvili's statement that he would definitely
    quit politics before the New Year was a mere metaphor?

    [Tsiskarishvili] Ivanishvili did not specify which particular New Year
    he was referring to.

    [Kvitashvili] So, do you think that the prime minister will not take
    this step before 1 January 2014?

    [Tsiskarishvili] Let us hope that he will not.

    [Kvitashvili] Why cannot Ivanishvili specify that he will not quit
    politics before 1 January 2014? His statements regarding his intention
    to resign before the New Year keep business in uncertainty and
    contribute considerably to the lack of investment, while also causing
    public anxiety and preventing the country from achieving stability.

    [Tsiskarishvili] I agree with you. We Georgians are generally strange
    people and our billionaires are no exception. I do not want anyone to
    think that I am arguing that Ivanishvili will not quit politics before
    1 January 2014. I am only suggesting and hoping that it will be so. We
    can also discuss a different theory whereby Ivanishvili will resign as
    prime minister before 1 January 2014. This theory is reinforced by the
    statements by Georgian Dream presidential candidate Giorgi
    Margvelashvili.

    [Kvitashvili] Which statements?

    [Tsiskarishvili] Margvelashvili has emphasized in every speech of his
    that cohabitation [between Ivanishvili's Georgian Dream coalition and
    President Mikheil Saakashvili's United National Movement] will end in
    Georgia 27 October. Could this mean that the restoration of justice
    that the Georgian people have been dreaming of will finally begin,
    albeit with a year's delay? If they start bringing charges against
    former officials in Georgia, the West will not be able to criticize
    Ivanishvili because he will no longer hold the office. The new
    president and the new prime minister will assume the responsibility
    and Georgian Dream could acquire greater freedom in terms of the
    restoration of justice. In short, according to this theory,
    Ivanishvili could resign this December. However, he will change his
    decision to quit politics if some signs of danger appear in the
    country.

    [Kvitashvili] This means that Ivanishvili is resigning in order to
    call the former government to justice. However, signs of danger could
    appear, could they not? Could we face the threat that Ivanishvili's
    resignation will be followed by uncontrolled or controlled chaos with
    all its implications?

    [Tsiskarishvili] The country could, indeed, face the danger of chaos
    after Ivanishvili quits politics. However, this should not be a matter
    of speculation. I will only say one thing: It all depends on the mood
    of Georgian Dream's members. Some of them are indifferent towards the
    question of Ivanishvili's quitting politics today. Some of them are
    very afraid, while others are trying to foresee their own place in the
    future political alignment.

    [Kvitashvili] To sum up, we can discuss two theories today. The first
    one is that, for various reasons, Ivanishvili will not quit politics
    before 1 January 2014, while the second one suggests that the prime
    minister will resign two months after the presidential election, so
    that a large-scale process of restoration of justice can begin in the
    country. Another question also arises here: Why can the restoration of
    justice not begin while Ivanishvili is still prime minister?

    [Tsiskarishvili] Ivanishvili has drawn more criticism both
    domestically and abroad than he had heard during his entire life.
    Consequently, he believes that he does not deserve this criticism and
    he wants to take a break. It would be unfair and ungrateful to
    begrudge him this. He managed to do what no one else had been able to
    achieve during the preceding nine years: He changed the Saakashvili
    regime through elections. We need to find the strength to contribute
    to the country's revival. I am convinced that Ivanishvili wants what
    is best for the country and I do not believe that he will leave
    Georgia at some point. If he agrees with the civil society's
    democratic principles, he will be very successful in that field as
    well. However, Ivanishvili will remain a target of criticism if the
    government and Georgian Dream continue to coordinate every single
    matter with him.

    [Kvitashvili] Let us look at the matter from our fellow citizens'
    perspective. Let us put it straight: The majority of the people do not
    believe that the government will be able to cope with the challenges
    without Ivanishvili. The people fear that chaos will begin in Georgia
    once it loses its "head." The people who voted personally for
    Ivanishvili 1 October 2012 expect the simplest of things from him: To
    sort things out in the country and to create guarantees of stability.
    They do not mind if he takes a break afterward.

    [Tsiskarishvili] Certainly, theoretically, there are reasons for this
    kind of concern. However, it is also clear that Ivanishvili is not
    planning to leave Georgia and the new prime minister will be someone
    associated with him. If we discuss the theoretical threat of chaos in
    Georgia, Georgian Dream will have the levers for declaring a state of
    emergency. However, I am convinced that, by the time Ivanishvili quits
    politics, there will be no political force in Georgia that will need
    chaos as a means of self-preservation.

    [Kvitashvili] There are, however, the special services of neighbouring
    countries.

    [Tsiskarishvili] The special services of neighbouring countries will
    not stop their operations regardless of who the prime minister is or
    how many Ivanishvilis there are in Georgia. We should therefore be
    ready for these challenges and we hopefully will be.

    [Kvitashvili] I would like to ask you about the statement that
    Ivanishvili made in response to a journalist's question at the last
    week's press conference. He said that he would not rule out the
    possibility of Georgia joining the Eurasian Union. This statement
    triggered such a stir that the prime minister had to explain himself
    the next day and say that the pro-Western course remains the keystone
    of Georgia's foreign policy.

    [Tsiskarishvili] Russia's political circles showed a strong interest
    in this statement by Ivanishvili and I became convinced that it was
    not by chance that Ivanishvili was asked about the Eurasian Union at
    the press conference. I am convinced that the stir that you mentioned
    was not entirely accidental.

    [Kvitashvili] Who planned it, the Russians?

    [Tsiskarishvili] I would not rule out the possibility that this stir
    was, in fact, planned by Russia. There is a strong aspiration in
    Russia to see Georgia join the Eurasian Union. Incidentally, they also
    had a teleconference at [Russian news agency] RIA Novosti 's office 6
    September in which I participated. The Russian side was represented by
    Sergey Glazyev, Vladimir Putin's adviser on post-Soviet integration,
    as well as members of the State Duma and the Public Chamber. The
    Russians were happy about Armenia's decision to join the Customs Union
    (official Yerevan signed an agreement on joining the common customs
    area of Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan a few days ago). However, I
    told them that information about the mood in Yerevan arrives in
    Tbilisi before it reaches Moscow. At the time when we were discussing
    this, protest rallies against the Customs Union were taking place in
    Yerevan. The Russians lectured us on why Georgia should join the
    Eurasian Union and one of the arguments they cited was that our
    country supposedly needs the "benefits" of this Customs Union. We also
    discovered there that this Customs Union is managed by the Eurasian
    Union's economic collaboration commission, which is a telling fact by
    itself. Incidentally, Putin's adviser claimed that Georgia is already
    participating in the Eurasian Union's work because it uses the Customs
    Union's system and tariffs in its trade relations with Kazakhstan and
    Belarus. The next question that was discussed was whether Russia is a
    trustworthy partner even within this Customs Union. My argument turned
    out to be inconvenient for the Russians. I told them that the Georgian
    Government had agreed to Russia's accession to the World Trade
    Organization and Moscow was supposed to supply Tbilisi with
    information about the turnover of goods on the Abkhazia and South
    Ossetia sections of Georgian-Russian border. Several years have passed
    but Russia is yet to meet this condition.

    Incidentally, the Russians want Azerbaijan to join the Eurasian Union
    along with Armenia. I told the Russian side's representatives that
    Moscow had blackmailed Armenia with the Karabakh question. They are
    doing the same to Azerbaijan and then they are surprised why, having
    seen this, the Georgian Government does not go begging to the Kremlin.

    [Kvitashvili] We all probably remember what methods Russia used to
    make us join the CIS [Commonwealth of Independent States] because the
    attitude towards this organization in Georgia in the early 1990s was
    the same as towards the Eurasian Union now. Could history repeat
    itself and will the Kremlin try to force us to join the Eurasian
    Union?

    [Tsiskarishvili] In order to prevent this, we need to constantly
    remind the public of what you just said. We discussed earlier whether
    Ivanishvili will leave or not. It is possible that the theory that we
    discussed is groundless and there is an entirely different reason. I
    would not rule out the possibility that Ivanishvili's decision to quit
    politics is linked to the reports that they could demand that he take
    this step.

    [Kvitashvili] Do you mean that Russia will demand that Ivanishvili
    bring Georgia into the Eurasian Union?

    [Tsiskarishvili] Yes, it is possible that Ivanishvili has information
    that Russia will demand in the near or distant future that he bring
    Georgia into the Eurasian Union. This could be the reason for his
    decision to quit politics.

    [Kvitashvili] What kinds of levers can they use against Ivanishvili?

    [Tsiskarishvili] These could be business levers, political levels,
    personal relations, threats, or blackmail. There were reports in
    Georgia about preparations for terrorist attacks against Ivanishvili.
    They can always find thugs willing to do this in the country. You
    should therefore refrain from judging the person who has access to a
    lot of information. Ivanishvili once told me that he has independent
    sources of information in a lot of countries and it was only in
    Georgia that he could not find time to follow the media. So, you
    should not assume that this person has a lack of information from any
    of the countries that are important for Georgia.

    [Kvitashvili] Once Ivanishvili resigns, why can Russia not demand that
    Margvelashvili (in the event of his victory in the presidential
    election) or prime minister X, whom Ivanishvili names as his
    successor, bring Georgia into the Eurasian Union?

    [Tsiskarishvili] Because Margvelashvili did not build his business in
    Russia and did not live there for many years. The Russians probably
    believe that it will be easier for them to discuss the Eurasian Union
    with Bidzina Ivanishvili. However, Ivanishvili considers it
    categorically unacceptable to start this discussion.

    [Kvitashvili] Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Grigoriy Karasin
    complained last week that the new Georgian Government does not want to
    restore relations with Russia.

    [Tsiskarishvili] The fact that Georgia has not restored diplomatic
    relations with Russia is a source of inconvenience for the latter. Yet
    the fact is that it was Georgia that proposed warming of relations
    between the two countries. Diplomatic relations will not be restored
    for obvious reasons.

    [Kvitashvili] Armenian Security Council Secretary Artur Baghdasaryan
    made a strange statement last week. He said that the Georgian,
    Russian, and Abkhazian sides had agreed to reopen the railroad
    [linking Armenia with Russia through Georgian territory]. The Georgian
    Government denied this. However, experts still voiced suspicions that
    some secret deal could have been made behind our backs.

    [Tsiskarishvili] This was a propaganda statement for Armenia's
    internal audience. Protests against the Customs Union are taking place
    in Yerevan, so they tried to please their people with the railroad
    question and make them happy by announcing that they would have direct
    railroad link with Russia.

    [Translated from Georgian]



    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X