Tweet
AZERBAIJAN: KARABAKH FLARE-UP SEEN AS KREMLIN MISCHIEF
EurasiaNet.org
Aug 14 2014
August 15, 2014 - 1:18pm, by Shahin Abbasov
Highlighting the challenge of forging a lasting political settlement
to the 26-year-long conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia over
Nagorno-Karabakh, officials and experts in the two countries are
offering starkly different views on the heavy fighting that erupted
around the territory in late July and early August.
Not surprisingly, everyone is convinced the other side started it. In
Armenia, observers believe that Baku's frustration with the stalled
Karabakh peace process boiled over, prompting the Azerbaijani military
to launch an attack. Azerbaijani analysts scoff at such speculation.
"Baku would not start active military actions because, at that
particular moment, both President Ilham Aliyev and Defense Minister
Zakir Hasanov were on holidays outside of Azerbaijan," Jasur Sumarinly,
the head of the Baku-based Doctrina strategic affairs think tank,
told EurasiaNet.org.
An opinion shared by many in Baku is that Armenia, Russia's strategic
ally in the Caucasus, started the late July clashes at Moscow's
behest in an effort to help reset the Kremlin's international
image. Russian leader Vladimir Putin is now widely regarded in the
West as a mischief-maker and bully, and is now eager to change that
perception, the thinking in Baku goes.
Vafa Guluzade, a foreign affairs commentator and a former policy
advisor to former president Heydar Aliyev, said the flare-up in
Nagorno-Karabakh was directly related to Russia's predicament in the
Ukrainian crisis, in which pro-Russian separatists are losing ground,
and Western sanctions on Russia are beginning to bite. Putin, Guluzade
added, used Armenia to stir the Karabakh pot in order to then intervene
in an effort to boost his credentials as a statesman.
Putin convened a snap summit August 10 with Azerbaijani President
Ilham Aliyev and his Armenian counterpart Serzh Sargsyan in order
to show the world his "peaceful, mediating face," Guluzade told
EurasiaNet.org. "Putin [also] wanted to show that Russia still plays
a decisive role in the South Caucasus," he added.
Other analysts believe Russia is also trying to compel Azerbaijan to
join the Kremlin-led Customs Union, an economic entity that Azerbaijani
officials have thus far shown no interest in joining.
"The Kremlin wants Yerevan to play a role in having Azerbaijan in the
[Customs] Union. The escalation [of tension] at the front, the death
of Azerbaijani soldiers and the [summit] meeting in Sochi is part
of one scenario," suggested Arastun Orujlu, who heads the East-West
think tank in Baku.
Guluzade and Orujlu indicated that it is highly unlikely that the
Aliyev administration's aversion to Customs Union membership will
change in the foreseeable future. But Orujlu, citing the government's
ongoing crackdown on internal dissent, cautioned that Baku was
alienating Western governments, something that could invite Kremlin
meddling in the future.
"In the current situation, Baku urgently needs to improve its relations
with Western powers. Those ties have been seriously damaged by the
recent crackdown on non-governmental organizations and the arrests
of civil society activists," Orujlu said.
Publicly, Azerbaijani government officials have made only vague and
non-committal statements concerning Putin's diplomacy. "We consider
the initiative of the Russian president as an effort to restore a
ceasefire in the region," Ali Hasanov, an influential presidential
aide, was quoted as saying by the Turan news agency.
A looming challenge for Azerbaijani authorities may be keeping the lid
on patriotic fervor. In the wake of the late July/early August clashes,
social networks in Azerbaijan buzzed with chest-thumping statements
about the country's martial prowess, and a mass desire of young men to
enlist in the army and go fight. Local media outlets also reported that
veterans of the 1991-1994 Karabakh conflict expressed readiness to take
up arms again. In response, Defense Ministry officials took steps to
dampen enthusiasm for mass enlistments. In the aftermath of the August
10 summit, Karabakh has remained quiet, and most experts in Baku do
not expect recent events to prompt a resumption of an all-out conflict.
"The big number of citizens' appeals we consider as a large show of
support to the army. We are thankful to [the public] and believe that
this patriotic initiative will raise moral spirit of our soldiers,"
said a Defense Ministry statement.
Editor's note: Shahin Abbasov is a freelance correspondent based
in Baku.
http://www.eurasianet.org/node/69566
EurasiaNet.org
Aug 14 2014
August 15, 2014 - 1:18pm, by Shahin Abbasov
Highlighting the challenge of forging a lasting political settlement
to the 26-year-long conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia over
Nagorno-Karabakh, officials and experts in the two countries are
offering starkly different views on the heavy fighting that erupted
around the territory in late July and early August.
Not surprisingly, everyone is convinced the other side started it. In
Armenia, observers believe that Baku's frustration with the stalled
Karabakh peace process boiled over, prompting the Azerbaijani military
to launch an attack. Azerbaijani analysts scoff at such speculation.
"Baku would not start active military actions because, at that
particular moment, both President Ilham Aliyev and Defense Minister
Zakir Hasanov were on holidays outside of Azerbaijan," Jasur Sumarinly,
the head of the Baku-based Doctrina strategic affairs think tank,
told EurasiaNet.org.
An opinion shared by many in Baku is that Armenia, Russia's strategic
ally in the Caucasus, started the late July clashes at Moscow's
behest in an effort to help reset the Kremlin's international
image. Russian leader Vladimir Putin is now widely regarded in the
West as a mischief-maker and bully, and is now eager to change that
perception, the thinking in Baku goes.
Vafa Guluzade, a foreign affairs commentator and a former policy
advisor to former president Heydar Aliyev, said the flare-up in
Nagorno-Karabakh was directly related to Russia's predicament in the
Ukrainian crisis, in which pro-Russian separatists are losing ground,
and Western sanctions on Russia are beginning to bite. Putin, Guluzade
added, used Armenia to stir the Karabakh pot in order to then intervene
in an effort to boost his credentials as a statesman.
Putin convened a snap summit August 10 with Azerbaijani President
Ilham Aliyev and his Armenian counterpart Serzh Sargsyan in order
to show the world his "peaceful, mediating face," Guluzade told
EurasiaNet.org. "Putin [also] wanted to show that Russia still plays
a decisive role in the South Caucasus," he added.
Other analysts believe Russia is also trying to compel Azerbaijan to
join the Kremlin-led Customs Union, an economic entity that Azerbaijani
officials have thus far shown no interest in joining.
"The Kremlin wants Yerevan to play a role in having Azerbaijan in the
[Customs] Union. The escalation [of tension] at the front, the death
of Azerbaijani soldiers and the [summit] meeting in Sochi is part
of one scenario," suggested Arastun Orujlu, who heads the East-West
think tank in Baku.
Guluzade and Orujlu indicated that it is highly unlikely that the
Aliyev administration's aversion to Customs Union membership will
change in the foreseeable future. But Orujlu, citing the government's
ongoing crackdown on internal dissent, cautioned that Baku was
alienating Western governments, something that could invite Kremlin
meddling in the future.
"In the current situation, Baku urgently needs to improve its relations
with Western powers. Those ties have been seriously damaged by the
recent crackdown on non-governmental organizations and the arrests
of civil society activists," Orujlu said.
Publicly, Azerbaijani government officials have made only vague and
non-committal statements concerning Putin's diplomacy. "We consider
the initiative of the Russian president as an effort to restore a
ceasefire in the region," Ali Hasanov, an influential presidential
aide, was quoted as saying by the Turan news agency.
A looming challenge for Azerbaijani authorities may be keeping the lid
on patriotic fervor. In the wake of the late July/early August clashes,
social networks in Azerbaijan buzzed with chest-thumping statements
about the country's martial prowess, and a mass desire of young men to
enlist in the army and go fight. Local media outlets also reported that
veterans of the 1991-1994 Karabakh conflict expressed readiness to take
up arms again. In response, Defense Ministry officials took steps to
dampen enthusiasm for mass enlistments. In the aftermath of the August
10 summit, Karabakh has remained quiet, and most experts in Baku do
not expect recent events to prompt a resumption of an all-out conflict.
"The big number of citizens' appeals we consider as a large show of
support to the army. We are thankful to [the public] and believe that
this patriotic initiative will raise moral spirit of our soldiers,"
said a Defense Ministry statement.
Editor's note: Shahin Abbasov is a freelance correspondent based
in Baku.
http://www.eurasianet.org/node/69566