Tweet
Nalbandyan's Weird Reaction
Hakob Badalyan, Political Commentator
Comments - 28 August 2014, 23:00
"We welcome the resolution of California Senate on recognition of
Independence of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic.
The more Azerbaijan continues to undermine the efforts of Armenia and
the international community aimed at the settlement of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the more new decisions and resolutions can
be expected paving way towards the international recognition of the
Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh," runs the statement of the NKR Ministry
of Foreign Affairs stated after the resolution of California Senate
recognizing the independence of NKR.
Nalbandyan who holds the position of foreign minister of Armenia, is
saying something interesting. So what do we have? If Azerbaijan does
not hinder the negotiations, will the independence of Artsakh not be
recognized? And what is the purpose of Armenia which participates in
the negotiation? Isn't the purpose the recognition of independence of
Artsakh? Isn't it unimportant whether Azerbaijan hinders the
negotiations or not?
Couldn't the minister of foreign affairs of Armenia be more creative
in his statement on the decision of California Senate (or at least he
could have googled better ideas in some term paper by a student of
international relations) than using the resolution of California
Senate to chide Azerbaijan for not being constructive.
What is the purpose of this urge of playing down on this act of state
level? Is this a conscious urge or is it already taking place
automatically?
The most important thing is that Nalbandyan knows very well that the
recognition of the Senate of California does not open up any way for
international recognition. This recognition has nothing to do with
either the number of U.S.A. states or the process of recognition by
the states.
This process is one of the sub-layers of the international policy. It
would be delusion and self-deception to mix up this later with
geopolitics. It is another issue that this issue has become a foreign
policy later for Armenia because geopolitics itself has been handed
over the Russia, including thanks to Nalbandyan.
In this respect, the temptation to "clean up" total failures in one of
the sub-layers is big but the realities do not change, and the
international recognition of Artsakh depends on the activity that
Armenia and Artsakh will develop at the geopolitical level.
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/32904#sthash.SGv5lZNA.dpuf
Hakob Badalyan, Political Commentator
Comments - 28 August 2014, 23:00
"We welcome the resolution of California Senate on recognition of
Independence of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic.
The more Azerbaijan continues to undermine the efforts of Armenia and
the international community aimed at the settlement of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the more new decisions and resolutions can
be expected paving way towards the international recognition of the
Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh," runs the statement of the NKR Ministry
of Foreign Affairs stated after the resolution of California Senate
recognizing the independence of NKR.
Nalbandyan who holds the position of foreign minister of Armenia, is
saying something interesting. So what do we have? If Azerbaijan does
not hinder the negotiations, will the independence of Artsakh not be
recognized? And what is the purpose of Armenia which participates in
the negotiation? Isn't the purpose the recognition of independence of
Artsakh? Isn't it unimportant whether Azerbaijan hinders the
negotiations or not?
Couldn't the minister of foreign affairs of Armenia be more creative
in his statement on the decision of California Senate (or at least he
could have googled better ideas in some term paper by a student of
international relations) than using the resolution of California
Senate to chide Azerbaijan for not being constructive.
What is the purpose of this urge of playing down on this act of state
level? Is this a conscious urge or is it already taking place
automatically?
The most important thing is that Nalbandyan knows very well that the
recognition of the Senate of California does not open up any way for
international recognition. This recognition has nothing to do with
either the number of U.S.A. states or the process of recognition by
the states.
This process is one of the sub-layers of the international policy. It
would be delusion and self-deception to mix up this later with
geopolitics. It is another issue that this issue has become a foreign
policy later for Armenia because geopolitics itself has been handed
over the Russia, including thanks to Nalbandyan.
In this respect, the temptation to "clean up" total failures in one of
the sub-layers is big but the realities do not change, and the
international recognition of Artsakh depends on the activity that
Armenia and Artsakh will develop at the geopolitical level.
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/32904#sthash.SGv5lZNA.dpuf