Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nairit Saga: Future Of Armenian Chemical Industry Looks Gloomy Amid

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nairit Saga: Future Of Armenian Chemical Industry Looks Gloomy Amid

    NAIRIT SAGA: FUTURE OF ARMENIAN CHEMICAL INDUSTRY LOOKS GLOOMY AMID CONCERNS OVER ITS FLAGSHIP

    ECONOMY | 10.12.14 | 10:48

    GOHAR ABRAHAMYAN
    ArmeniaNow reporter

    RELATED NEWS

    Nairit: Chemical plant administration stands by back wages repayment
    pledge

    Workers of Nairit, a giant chemical plant in Armenia known worldwide
    for its chloroprene rubber production, staged several protests near
    government offices in Yerevan in recent days demanding their back
    wages as well as more clarity over the fate of the enterprise.

    Prime Minister Hovik Abrahamyan received a delegation of the
    protesters to hear their complaints on Tuesday and promised to hold
    another meeting later this week to learn more about the problems of
    the mostly idling plant. At the same time, it was announced that the
    workers will be paid their wages for one month by the end of the year.

    Nairit, which was built on the outskirts of Yerevan in the 1930s,
    supplied up to 30 types of chemical products during the Soviet times.

    But the plant was closed in 1989 for environmental reasons. It was
    partly resumed in 1992 after Armenia gained independence. Nairit
    is the only plant in the post-Soviet space to have the capacity to
    produce chloroprene rubber. It is one of the largest enterprises in
    Armenia employing a staff of around 3,000. But for years most of the
    workers have been furloughed as the plant has either idled or worked
    at fraction of its capacity. The plant dogged by financial problems
    owes wages for up to 18 months to its workers. The total debt at
    present is estimated at some $15 million.

    In 2006 Rhinoville Property Limited Company, a 90-percent stakeholder
    at Nairit, took a loan from the CIS Interstate Bank mortgaging the
    plant. It later failed to repay the loan and in January 2014 the
    Moscow Arbitration Court obliged the offshore-registered company to
    pay to the CIS Interstate Bank a sum of $107.95 million on account
    of outstanding loan commitments.

    On Tuesday, the plant's management assured its employees that it is
    committed to clearing the wage arrears. Many workers fear the plant
    may soon be declared bankrupt and its obligations on accumulated
    wages debts will remain on paper at best.

    The statement issued by the Nairit administration says that the
    company will sign new contracts with nearly 500 employees, which
    actually confirms that more than 1,000 workers will be eventually
    laid off in February.

    Nairit's former director Karen Israyelyan believes that the kind
    of approach to a giant industrial plant is depriving Armenia of its
    major asset.

    "If a country like China turns to Armenia for cooperation in the
    chemical industry, it means that even there they understand the
    value of the enterprise. But we are driving this enterprise towards
    bankruptcy, shutting it down, this is absurd," he told ArmeniaNow,
    referring to cooperation projects carried out with China since 2002.

    The specialist stresses that Nairit won't survive another closure
    which will also prove a major blow to the country's chemical industry.

    "When the chemical industry was developing on the basis of this plant
    we had students, a faculty that trained specialists who later were
    hired by the enterprise, but the closure of the plant will spell an
    end for the industry in which Armenia used to be a powerhouse during
    the Soviet times," says Israyelyan.

    The former Nairit director says that by working at its full capacity
    today the plant can employ 2,100 people. He claims that the extra
    personnel that were hired in addition to that number in recent years
    were rather a liability. Those highly paid people, Israyelyan argues,
    "were bloodsuckers who did not provide work worth a penny."

    Israyelyan is surprised that workers at present demand not the
    resumption of the plant, but the repayment of the wages. "I think it
    is wrong to demand this money, they [the furloughed workers] did not
    do any good. Who are we demanding this money from, the state? What
    is the state's obligation on repaying these debts?" he queries.

    http://armenianow.com/economy/59193/armenia_nairit_chemical_plant_problems

Working...
X