Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: Lawyer Says Recent Testimony Of Dink Murder Hitman Is Part O

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: Lawyer Says Recent Testimony Of Dink Murder Hitman Is Part O

    LAWYER SAYS RECENT TESTIMONY OF DINK MURDER HITMAN IS PART OF PLOT

    Today's Zaman, Turkey
    Dec 12 2014

    December 12, 2014, Friday/ 14:16:54/
    by YAKUP CETÝN / ISTANBUL

    The lawyer of Erhan Tuncel, an informant for the Trabzon Police
    Department who was accused of initiating the effort to have
    Armenian-Turkish journalist Hrant Dink murdered in 2007, has said
    that the recent testimony of the hitman who killed Dink, Ogun Samast,
    is part of a plot designed to link the faith-based Hizmet movement
    with the murder.

    Tuncel's lawyer, Erdoðan Soruklu, told the press that they had heard
    earlier that a plot was being designed regarding the Dink assassination
    and that someone was attempting to convince Samast, who was sentenced
    to 21 years and six months in prison in 2011 for assassinating Dink,
    to speak "as desired." "We had heard about a plot, but we were not sure
    whether Ogun [Samast] was convinced or not. The testimony [recently
    provided by Samast] has shown that he was convinced," Soruklu said.

    Seven years after the murder, Samast suddenly decided to testify as
    a witness on Dec. 5 to Prosecutor Yusuf Hakký Doðan. Samast's latest
    testimony differs from what he said back in 2010. Most recently he
    claimed that while at Tuncel's house he heard a conversation between
    two people who were talking about Ramazan Akyurek, the former head
    of the intelligence unit of the National Police Department, and a
    police chief named Fuat.

    Samast said that when he asked Yasin Hayal -- another suspect in the
    case who was sentenced to life in prison for inciting Samast to commit
    the murder -- about the names he overheard, he was told that Tuncel
    knew these people and that they were fully behind the plot to kill
    Dink. The testimony contradicts Samast's 2010 deposition that led to
    his conviction. He had earlier claimed that he never knew Tuncel and
    that Hayal was acting as a liaison to Tuncel.

    Pro-government media outlets, such as the Sabah daily, used Samast's
    testimony to report on an alleged link between the Dink murder and
    the Hizmet movement, which is inspired by the teachings of Turkish
    Islamic scholar Fethullah Gulen. Their reports implied that Hizmet
    members were the ones behind the assassination.

    Soruklu said Samast's testimony is contradictory, adding that it
    would be very easy to expose these contradictions.

    Soruklu says evidence in Dink trial destroyed

    The lawyer also said that the location where Dink was attacked is one
    where there are security cameras everywhere, but just one recording
    was provided as evidence. "We believe that almost all the evidence
    and video collected from the security cameras was destroyed," he said.

    Hakan Bakýrcýoðlu, a lawyer representing the Dink family, filed a
    complaint against police inspector Selim Kutkan, who was the head of
    the Ýstanbul Police Department's anti-terrorism unit when Dink's murder
    took place on Jan. 19, 2007, for playing a role in the destruction of
    security camera footage from an ATM on the street where Dink was shot
    and killed. Bakýrcýoðlu had said Kutkan was a lackey of Workers' Party
    (ÝP) leader Doðu Perincek, who was given life without parole in August
    of 2013 in the trial against the Ergenekon terrorist organization,
    but was then released in March of this year.

    Dink was assassinated in broad daylight outside the office of his Agos
    newspaper by an ultranationalist teenager in January 2007. Samast and
    18 others were brought to trial. During the process, the lawyers for
    the Dink family and the co-plaintiffs in the case presented evidence
    indicating that Samast did not act alone.

    Tuncel, who was the man accused of initiating the effort to have
    Dink murdered, was acquitted of all charges related to the killing
    of Dink, but then rearrested during the retrial of the murder case
    early in 2014. He was released again in March of 2014 as part of a
    bill reducing the maximum period of arrest to five years.

    Deputy governor confirms Dink 'warned' over Sabiha Gokcen reports

    In recent years, there have been claims in the media that former
    Ýstanbul Deputy Governor Ergun Gungor and National Intelligence
    Organization (MÝT) members invited Dink to the Ýstanbul Governor's
    Office to warn him of "possible danger if he continues to make
    controversial statements."

    Testifying for the Ýstanbul Chief Public Prosecutor's Office on Dec. 9
    as a suspect in the trial into the Dink murder, Gungor reportedly told
    the prosecutors that his meeting with Dink at the governor's office
    took place "on an order from MÝT." Confirming MÝT's role during his
    testimony, Gungor also stated that Dink was warned that his report
    about Sabiha Gokcen, the adopted daughter of the founder of the
    Turkish Republic, "might be manipulated by someone or some segments"
    during the conversation at the governor's office.

    It was claimed that Gungor had summoned Dink to his office on Feb. 24,
    2004, where two MÝT agents warned the journalist to be "more careful"
    about what he wrote. The meeting came a week after Dink had suggested
    that Gokcen was in fact an Armenian orphan. During the conversation,
    the deputy governor and the two MÝT officials threatened Dink by
    saying things like, "We know who you are, but society may not" and
    "We are concerned that society might not be able to understand things
    like this."

    http://www.todayszaman.com/latest-news_lawyer-says-recent-testimony-of-dink-murder-hitman-is-part-of-plot_366775.html

Working...
X