Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prominent Lawyer Amal Clooney To Represent Armenia At ECHR

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Prominent Lawyer Amal Clooney To Represent Armenia At ECHR

    PROMINENT LAWYER AMAL CLOONEY TO REPRESENT ARMENIA AT ECHR

    Legal Monitor Worldwide
    December 24, 2014 Wednesday

    Amal Ramzi Alamuddin, wife of prominent actor and human rights
    activist George Clooney, will be one of the attorneys representing
    Armenia next month at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR),
    according to Harut Sassounian, Publisher of The California Courier.

    "Mrs. Clooney is a highly regarded attorney specializing in
    international law, criminal law, human rights, and extradition. She
    has been involved in several major lawsuits such as return of the Elgin
    Marbles from Great Britain to Greece, and defending Julian Assange of
    WikiLeaks and former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko. She has
    also worked with the Prosecutor of the UN Special Tribunal for Lebanon,
    and the International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia,"
    Sassounian says.

    She was born in Lebanon to a Druze father and Sunni Muslim mother in
    1978. At the age of two, her family moved to the United Kingdom. She
    received her law degree from New York University School of Law and
    clerked at the International Court of Justice (World Court). After
    returning to London in 2010, she became a barrister at the Doughty
    Street Chambers. She served as advisor to Kofi Annan, UN Special Envoy
    on Syria, and as Counsel to the 2013 UN Drone Inquiry team. She is
    fluent in English, French and Arabic. Her marriage to George Clooney
    in September 2014 made worldwide headlines.

    "With such impeccable credentials, Mrs. Clooney will be a great asset
    to Armenia's legal team in Strasbourg, in the appeal of Perincek vs.

    Switzerland before the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human
    Rights on Jan 28. The case involves the conviction by Swiss courts
    of Dogu Perincek, a minor Turkish political party leader, who had
    travelled to Switzerland in 2005 with the explicit intent of denying
    the truth of the Armenian Genocide. In 2008, Perincek appealed the
    Swiss ruling to the European Court of Human Rights. A majority of
    five out of seven ECHR judges ruled on Dec 17, 2013 that Switzerland
    had violated Perincek's right to free expression," Sassounian says.

    "This ruling was an unfair and unacceptable double standard, as the
    court considered denial of the Jewish Holocaust a crime, but Armenian
    Genocide denial an infringement on free speech. The five judges who
    ruled against Switzerland made countless judgmental and factual
    errors, misrepresenting Perincek's allegations, misinterpreting
    Switzerland's laws and court rulings, lacking basic knowledge of the
    Armenian Genocide, and repeatedly contradicting themselves. Two of
    the seven judges disagreed with the majority's ruling and submitted
    a comprehensive 19-page report on the Armenian Genocide, siding with
    the Swiss court," he says. On March 17, 2014, Switzerland decided
    to appeal the ruling to ECHR's 17-judge Grand Chamber, to defend the
    integrity of its laws and the country's legal system. Specifically,
    the Swiss government challenged the court's decision on three grounds:

    1. ECHR had never before dealt with the juridical qualification of
    genocide and the scope of freedom of expression;

    2. The undue restriction of "the margin of appreciation" available
    to Switzerland under ECHR's jurisprudence;

    3. The establishment of 'artificial distinctions' - in the absence
    of an international verdict, ECHR should have considered the Turkish
    Court's 1919 guilty verdicts against the masterminds of the Armenian
    Genocide as evidence related to World Court's jurisprudence.

    Last year, when ECHR's lower court was considering Perincek's case,
    Armenia did not participate. Turkey, however, intervened by submitting
    extensive documentation questioning the veracity of the Armenian
    Genocide. This time around Armenia will take part with a strong legal
    team, which includes Geoffrey Robertson QC, a preeminent international
    lawyer and author of the remarkable book, "An Inconvenient Genocide:
    Who Now Remembers the Armenians?" Robertson will be joined in court by
    his associate Amal Clooney, and two Armenian government representatives
    Gevorg Kostanyan and Emil Babayan.

    It is imperative that on the eve of the Armenian Genocide's Centennial
    in 2015, ECHR's Grand Chamber reverse the lower court's flawed
    ruling, restoring the integrity of Swiss laws and preventing Turkey
    and Perincek from exporting their genocide denialism to Europe and
    beyond, Sassounian concludes. 2014 Legal Monitor Worldwide.


    From: Baghdasarian
Working...
X