Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Artak Davtyan. "Caviar Diplomacy Is A Reality, With Which We Should

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Artak Davtyan. "Caviar Diplomacy Is A Reality, With Which We Should

    ARTAK DAVTYAN. "CAVIAR DIPLOMACY IS A REALITY, WITH WHICH WE SHOULD RECKON."

    February 19 2014

    Recently, once again a noise was raised in Europe regarding the
    information of giving a brine to the European MPs. In the conversation
    with Aravot, Artak Davtyan, an NA MP, member of RPA faction, noted,
    "Caviar diplomacy has become a part of diplomatic vocabulary. I was a
    member of the OSCE parliamentary delegation at the previous convocation
    of the National Assembly and have actually seen these phenomena under
    the name "lobbying". It is very evident, especially in the cases
    when the MP of a democratic country that seems is not related to the
    case stands for the protection of interests of Azerbaijan, moreover,
    more zealously than the Azerbaijani delegation members are. There
    are more Catholic in their manifestations than the Pope of Rome, and
    when you are trying to talk to these people, you understand that they
    are unaware of the essence of the problem and often are just reading
    prepared texts. This is the reality, with which we should reckon." To
    our question of whether or not Armenia should somehow respond to these
    phenomena or related information, Mr. Davtyan responded, "Responds
    constantly happen. Whatever platforms this-or-that officials act, they
    always get the response. Specifically with Parliamentary Platform,
    they always get their answers, in addition, we present the situation
    to the partners of this official.

    In such interested "protections", we explain to the other partners
    what the problem is, and, as a rule, these "protections" do not
    affect. Leading such a policy by Azerbaijan is something like to be
    accountable before the country's leadership, they want to show that,
    look, this-or-that foreign country MP or the official received his
    "honorarium", and as an actual evidence of giving "honorarium",
    they cite his initiatives, statements, speeches, or which is worse,
    sometimes we also see that they are presenting some resolutions. Of
    course, they are doing their best to maneuver from direct questions,
    they say that they are concerned about democracy, the situation of
    refugees, or elimination of consequences of the war, but with such
    practice they are just casting a shadow over the high and lofty ideas
    they are talking about."

    Melania BARSEGHYAN

    Read more at: http://en.aravot.am/2014/02/19/163902/

Working...
X