Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turkish Divisions And The Armenian Question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Turkish Divisions And The Armenian Question

    TURKISH DIVISIONS AND THE ARMENIAN QUESTION

    EDITORIAL | MARCH 24, 2014 11:24 AM
    ________________________________

    By Raffi Bedrosyan

    Like a cell dividing itself into two, then each new cell further
    dividing itself into two, Turkey keeps being divided. Divisions always
    existed but remained mostly suppressed, but now they are emerging. In
    this article, I would like to outline the old and new divisions in
    Turkey and the divided Turks' perception of us the Armenians.

    Ever since the founding of the republic in 1923, Turkey was
    governed by a secular, Kemalist and nationalist ideology, with the
    single-minded objective of creating and maintaining a single-nation
    state. Regardless of which party was in power, leftist or rightist,
    the deep state dominated by the armed forces, big business, big state
    bureaucracy, media and academia, directed all the affairs behind
    the scenes. The deep state leaders and their backers emerged as the
    elite of the society, aptly named as the nationalist White Turks, who
    basically inherited and further developed a state built on the economic
    foundations of plundered and confiscated Armenian and Greek wealth and
    assets. The masses in Anatolia were mainly utilized as free bodies
    for the military elite, as cheap labor for the industrial elite, or
    remembered only at election time to vote for the political elite. The
    pious Sunni Moslem majority in Anatolia was condescended to by the
    White Turks and defined by the term "takunyali" or clog wearers. The
    disappearance of the Armenians and Greeks from these lands was fiercely
    denied. The existence of other ethnic people in Turkey, such as Kurds,
    was also continuously denied. "Turkey is only for Turks" was their
    motto; accordingly, since Armenians and Greeks were already wiped out,
    all the other ethnic groups were told that they are now Turks, or else.

    The supremacy of the White Turks ended in 2003, with the election
    of Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his moderately Islamic party. Despite
    all attempts of the deep state to topple him, he outmaneuvered the
    White Turks, thanks to the religious Sunni Moslem masses of Anatolia
    and the recent arrival of underprivileged masses from Anatolia to
    the big cities. The provincial and religious Turks quickly secured
    and strengthened their grip on power. Influential fundamentalist
    religious leader Fethullah Gulen, who had had to leave Turkey during
    the previous nationalist secular regimes, cooperated with Erdogan and
    his followers, quickly filled the cadres of bureaucracy, including
    key posts in the police, security, judiciary and academia. Based on
    charges of attempted coup d'etat against the government, hundreds of
    deep state leaders and elite White Turks in the military, media and
    academia were arrested and jailed. Although less intolerant toward
    minorities than the White Turks, the attitude of the new leaders
    toward the minorities and the Kurds did not change much. Many White
    Turks started leaving the country.

    The alliance and cooperation of Erdogan and Gulen ended in late 2013,
    when Erdogan felt secure enough to discard Gulen, and decided to shut
    down the numerous supplementary educational facilities controlled
    by Gulen. As the education system in the state high schools is not
    sufficient to secure admission to state universities, most parents
    in Turkey depended on these facilities for the advancement of their
    children. These facilities were used as a power base by Gulen, a
    major source of income as well as recruitment for new followers. Soon
    after Erdogan announced the intention to close these facilities,
    state prosecutors and police controlled by Gulen revealed uncovering
    a major corruption scandal against four of Erdogan's ministers,
    involving hundreds of millions of dollars in bribes, with all the juicy
    details of money counting machines and millions stashed in shoe boxes
    in ministers' homes. Erdogan counter attacked by swiftly removing,
    replacing and firing thousands of state prosecutors, judges and police
    officers deemed to be followers of the Gulen movement. In the last few
    weeks, at least ten taped telephone conversations were leaked on the
    internet involving Erdogan, where Erdogan directs his son to get rid
    of hundreds of millions of cash in Euro and dollars from the family
    homes, orders several businessmen to pay $100 million each toward
    buying a media empire that he wants controlled, demands another
    media owner to fire several journalists, decides how much certain
    contractors must pay in bribes or properties in return for getting
    large contracts involving construction of airports and bridges. In
    the western world, even a hint of attempted bribery or corruption
    may be sufficient to bring down governments, but in Turkey, Erdogan
    carries on, dismissing the evidence as plots hatched by his one-time
    ally and now-mortal-enemy Gulen, as well as other virtual enemies
    such as "parallel states" within Turkey, and predictably, external
    enemies such as Israel, US, EU and the "interest lobby" jealous of
    the fast growth of Turkey. Erdogan's latest move is to try to win
    back the nationalists who were charged and jailed for attempting to
    topple his own government; as a result, most of the jailed deep state
    leaders are immediately released this week, including the former army
    Chief of Staff and other commanders, the intelligence spy and one of
    the masterminds of the Hrant Dink assassination, the racist lawyer
    who hounded Dink for "insulting Turkishness," the politician who was
    charged for stating "the Armenian Genocide is a lie" in Switzerland but
    the European Court of Human rights had recently sided with him in the
    name of freedom of speech, the murderers of a German and two Turkish
    Protestant missionaries in Malatya, several ultra nationalist/racist
    journalists, and an organized crime leader who arranged contract
    killings of anti-nationalists and Kurds. It seems that the stage is
    set for a potential settling of accounts.

    While these divisions took place among the Turks of Turkey, the Kurds
    of Turkey made major advances toward their goals of greater autonomy,
    language rights and self-determination, a struggle on going since
    the 1980s first as a guerilla movement and from the 2000s on as an
    emerging political movement. The imprisoned PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan
    imposed his will on Erdogan, who conceded to start peace talks with
    him in exchange for a ceasefire.

    Even though these four major divisions within Turkey keep fighting and
    plotting against one another, they come together and close ranks when
    it comes to the Armenian issue, past and present. The Turks themselves
    categorize Armenians into three distinct groups, in a completely
    misguided manner -- the Good, the Bad and the Poor. The small Armenian
    community remaining in Turkey is the "Good," easily controllable, not
    a threat anymore, with neighborly memories of shared dolma or topik.

    But these Armenians in Turkey are "Good" as long as they don't demand
    much about the past or present, like Hrant Dink dared. The Diaspora
    is the "Bad, the evil presence in every country poisoning the locals
    against Turks and Turkey, spreading lies about the 'alleged' genocide
    of 1915. Finally, the Armenians of Armenia are the "Poor," who leave
    their country and come to Turkey to find bread. The Kurds relatively
    have more empathy toward the Armenians; however, it is more a case
    of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." Although Ocalan came close
    to acknowledging the genocide, he has empathy only for the "Good"
    Armenians in Turkey and he continues defining the Diaspora as part
    of the external lobby threat against both Turks and Kurds. While the
    Kurds acknowledge the sufferings of the Armenians in 1915, they see
    themselves only as manipulated tools of the Turks and cannot bring
    themselves to acknowledge their active role in the Genocide, nor open
    the subject of returning the vast properties seized from the Armenians,
    barring a few exceptions.

    Armenians who believe in meaningful dialogue with the peoples of
    Turkey, now face the additional challenge of choosing one or more of
    these groups at the expense of alienating the others, and on the eve
    of the centennial in 2015, the prospect of any productive results
    becomes dimmer by the day. But dialogue does continue, with the
    help of various civil society organizations, intellectuals, and more
    significantly, through the facilitation of the new emerging force of
    Islamized Armenians of Turkey. Dialogue must and will continue until
    all four groups in Turkey start to see that all Armenians, whether
    in Turkey, Diaspora or Armenia, whether good, bad or poor, are all
    equally impacted by the genocide and equally demand acknowledgment
    and restitution.

    (Raffi Bedrosyan is a civil engineer and concert pianist, living
    in Toronto, Canada. He has donated concert and CD proceedings to
    infrastructure projects in Armenia and Karabagh, in which he has also
    participated as an engineer. He helped organize the reconstruction of
    the Surp Giragos Diyarbakir/Dikranagerd Church and the first Armenian
    reclaim of church properties in Anatolia after 1915. He gave the
    first piano concert in the Surp Giragos Church since 1915.)

    - See more at:
    http://www.mirrorspectator.com/2014/03/24/turkish-divisions-and-the-armenian-question/#sthash.qMNfdQto.dpuf

Working...
X