Tweet
NATO AND PLANNED 'CHAOS' IN THE NWO
PRAVDA, Russia
Sept 10 2014
10.09.2014
By Takis Fotopoulos
Nowadays, many people who do not even have the time to spare to
understand what is really going on around them--particularly those
absorbed into the struggle for survival who mainly let the TV "experts"
think for them--usually form the impression that we live in a chaotic
world. I refer, of course, to the victims of neoliberal globalization -
the great majority of the world population - and not those who benefit
from it, including many in the intelligentsia who can not even see
that there is a New World Order (NWO) based on neoliberal globalization
and managed by a Transnational Elite (TE)-basically the elites of the
"G7" countries. However, it is only within such an analytical framework
that one can really understand why our world is anything but chaotic,
in the common sense of the unpredictable disorder.
Print version Font Size Send to friend
The beheadings in Iraq repeated continuously on TV screens (with
the obvious intention of the media controlled by the TE to whip up
islamophobia and distract attention from the far bigger massacre in
Gaza, as a counterbalance to the rise of anti-Zionism around the world)
are directly connected with the NATO-led invasion and the consequent
destruction of Iraq.[1] Similarly, the latter is directly linked to
the previous brutal NATO bombings in Yugoslavia that were designed
to dismember that country, as well as to the similar NATO bombings in
Libya that followed, which destroyed the country's infrastructure and
converted it into a 'failed state'. Then, came the organized armed
"insurrection" in Syria and nobody will be surprised if similar to
the Libyan NATO bombings are about to start there, on the pretext of
fighting Islamist terrorists (the same ones who up to a few months ago
were supported by the TE with the aim to overthrow Assad!). Finally, we
saw this year that the model of armed 'insurrections' was transplanted
to the European soil itself, in Ukraine, which threatens to draw even
the entire continent into an all-out war.[2]
At the same time, we witness the continued inhumane Zionist ethnic
cleansing of Palestinians, or the "incremental genocide", as it
has been called by the Jewish historian Ilan Pappe,[3] who is one
of the most important historians who substantiated it, and at the
forefront of the few truly anti-Zionist Jews. This is in contrast
to the international Zionist elite[4], who are now busy in passing
fascist inspired "anti-racist" laws into EU parliaments. Thus, a
legally mandatory way of perceiving even historical events such as
the "Holocaust" is introduced, which now must be recognized (with
the threat of imprisonment!) as a historically unique genocide. This
despite the fact that, for example, the genocide of the Armenians
(or the Armenian "Holocaust" as it is sometimes called ) was probably
much more extensive - not to mention the genocide of Indians in the
Americas, Australia etc., which essentially wiped out whole nations!
This is of course an old debate that began in these countries which
introduced first similar legislation, given their involvement or
sympathies to Nazi Germany (i.e. Germany itself, Austria, Switzerland,
France etc) but has now resurfaced given the present EU systematic
effort to force European parliaments to pass similar legislation
(the latest example being Greece). France, in particular, became
infamous when it used such a law to prosecute even the well known
communist and resistance fighter Roger Garaudy as "Holocaust denier",
establishing the fascist principle that historical events are not
subject of historical research and collective memory but a matter to
be dealt with by the state and whoever controls it![5]
The link between all these wars and massacres, but also the
corresponding economic warfare now strangling the Greek people,
the Portuguese, the Spaniards (and currently even the French people
who still resist globalization), is the systematic effort by the TE
running the NWO of neoliberal globalization to integrate all peoples
not yet fully integrated into it. However, despite the nonsense of
the degenerate "Left", which talks about "bad" neoliberal policies etc.
imposed by some "traitors" of social democracy, or the equivalent
nonsense of the Palaeolithic Marxist Left which attempts to "explain"
these wars with the doctrine of "intra-imperialist conflicts" the
consequence Is simply the turn of the popular strata to the patriotic
or nationalist right, if not the far right itself, as we have seen in
the last European elections. The ideological bankruptcy of the 'left'
became evident when it was unable to explain the unprecedented unity of
the TE in supporting all these wars, despite the 'intra-imperialist
conflicts'. Unless, of course, the only imperialisms around are
on the one hand the TE imperialism and on the other the Russian
'imperialism', despite the fact that the Russian Federation has not
begun any imperialist war in its history nor of course controls the
world economy through Transnational Corporations (TNCs), or the world
polity through hundreds of military bases around the world, or finally
the world media, through press corporations and press magnates.
All this, at the very moment when the TE-controlled media are busy
in promοting the myth of Russia bent to conquer the world whereas
any theory about the NWÎ~_ of neolibereal globalization and the TE
running it is dismissed (with the decisive help o the same "Left")
as a conspiracy theory. Unsurprisingly, this "Left" accuses Hollande
for an about turn with respect to his socialist promises forgetting
that his predecessor Mitterand was also forced to do exactly the same
about turn, let alone Oscar Lafontaine in Germany who was forced to
resign when he attempted to introduce economic policies not compatible
with neoliberal globalization.
This is of course because it is now inconceivable for any country
fully integrated into the NWO to implement any different policies
from the universal neoliberal policies. This is not some sort of a
conspiracy,[6] or just a bad ideology implemented by some baddies
(bankers, politicians etc). This is just the inevitable consequence
of opening and liberalizing the markets for capital, commodities
and labour and joining the international institutions controlled by
the TE (WTO, IMF, WB etc) whose job is to impose these policies when
e.g. a member country asks for a loan or to benefit from an investment
program. Needless to add that the dismantling of economic self-reliance
by globalization and the creation of export economies everywhere turns
most countries integrated into the NWO and particularly the weaker
ones into beggars of the TNCs' investment, so that they could avoid
stagnation and borrowing . THerefore, every country knows very well
to whose tune it should dance.
Furthermore, not only are the BRICS (except Russia) completely
integrated into the NWO, without sharing any significant transnational
sovereignty (economic, political, military, cultural and media power at
the transnational level), but even worse, their national sovereignty
is clearly inferior to that of Russia. China, for example, is highly
integrated into the global economy, a fact that has led to a dramatic
increase in inequality in this "socialist" country, since it was
fully integrated into the NWO,[7] whereas its status as an economic
superpower is clearly based on its huge population (the purchasing
power of its GDP per head of the population is 99th in the world)
and the significant industrial and trade power created by the massive
move of TNCs from the TE countries, in the past thirty years or so,
in the pursuit of production cost minimisation and profit maximisation.
The above conclusions about Russia were confirmed also last week at the
NATO Summit, in a Cardiff under occupation by the security services ,
where, discussions were held on how to directly subdue the people in
Eastern Ukraine (who are resisting the junta imposed on them via a
"coup from below' organised by the Transnational Elite) but also
to indirectly subdue the Russian people, the vast majority of whom
support the resistance struggle.
So, the critical decision that will determine the fate not only
of Russia and the Eurasian Union, but of all of us, will be taken
within Russia itself. One option is for the pro-globalization part of
the Russian elite to prevail; the alternative is for the patriotic
anti-globalization part of it to predominate. Which option will be
chosen will determine whether Russia will capitulate to the global
governance of the TE, or whether, instead, it will act as a leader of
an alternative world order of sovereign states based on the Eurasian
Union, as originally conceived, which will aim to achieve national
and economic self-reliance in each country - a prerequisite for any
systemic change in the future ...
Takis Fotopoulos
Takis Fotopoulos is a political philosopher, editor of Society &
Nature/Democracy and Nature/The International Journal of Inclusive
Democracy. He has also been a columnist for the Athens Daily
Eleftherotypia since 1990. Between 1969 and 1989 he was Senior Lecturer
in Economics at the University of North London.
This article is a synthesis of two articles that were first published
in TF's weekly column in Sunday's Eleftherotypia (a Greek daily
published in Athens) on 31/8/2014 and 7//9/2014. The translation into
English was edited by Jonathan Rutherford.
[1] See Takis Fotopoulos, "ISIS role in destruction
of Iraq by transnational elite", RT, 11/7/2014
http://rt.com/op-edge/172084-isis-iraq-destruction-elite/
[2] see Takis Fotopoulos, Ukraine: The attack on Russia and the
Eurasian Union (to be published shortly by Progressive Press).
[3] Ilan Pappe, "Israel's incremental genocide in
the Gaza ghetto", The Electronic Intifada, 13/7/2014
http://electronicintifada.net/content/israels-incremental-genocide-gaza-ghetto/13562
[4] see for the relation between the TE and the Zionist
elite, Takis Fotopoulos, The Zionist Brutalization Within
the New World Order and the Need for a United Multi-national
and Multicultural State*, The International Journal of
INCLUSIVE DEMOCRACY, Vol. 10, Nos. 1/2 (Winter-Summer 2014)
http://www.inclusivedemocracy.org/journal/vol10/vol10_no1-2_The_Zionist_Brutalization_Takis.html
[5] see for a discussion of the issues involved in this sort
of fascist inspiration legislation, Norman Finkelstein, The
Holocaust Industry, (Verso, 2000) and for an older discussion,
Mark Weber, "Switzerland's Anti-Racism Law", The Journal of
Historical Review, July/August 1998 (Vol. 17, No. 4), page 13
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n4p13_Weber.html
[6] see e.g. for a best seller of such a conspiracy theory Naomi Klein,
The Shock Doctrine, (Penguin, 2008)
[7] 'China reveals income gap statistics after 12 year of silence',
RT, 18/1/2013 http://rt.com/business/china-income-gap-reveals-288/
http://english.pravda.ru/world/europe/10-09-2014/128496-nato_chaos-0/
PRAVDA, Russia
Sept 10 2014
10.09.2014
By Takis Fotopoulos
Nowadays, many people who do not even have the time to spare to
understand what is really going on around them--particularly those
absorbed into the struggle for survival who mainly let the TV "experts"
think for them--usually form the impression that we live in a chaotic
world. I refer, of course, to the victims of neoliberal globalization -
the great majority of the world population - and not those who benefit
from it, including many in the intelligentsia who can not even see
that there is a New World Order (NWO) based on neoliberal globalization
and managed by a Transnational Elite (TE)-basically the elites of the
"G7" countries. However, it is only within such an analytical framework
that one can really understand why our world is anything but chaotic,
in the common sense of the unpredictable disorder.
Print version Font Size Send to friend
The beheadings in Iraq repeated continuously on TV screens (with
the obvious intention of the media controlled by the TE to whip up
islamophobia and distract attention from the far bigger massacre in
Gaza, as a counterbalance to the rise of anti-Zionism around the world)
are directly connected with the NATO-led invasion and the consequent
destruction of Iraq.[1] Similarly, the latter is directly linked to
the previous brutal NATO bombings in Yugoslavia that were designed
to dismember that country, as well as to the similar NATO bombings in
Libya that followed, which destroyed the country's infrastructure and
converted it into a 'failed state'. Then, came the organized armed
"insurrection" in Syria and nobody will be surprised if similar to
the Libyan NATO bombings are about to start there, on the pretext of
fighting Islamist terrorists (the same ones who up to a few months ago
were supported by the TE with the aim to overthrow Assad!). Finally, we
saw this year that the model of armed 'insurrections' was transplanted
to the European soil itself, in Ukraine, which threatens to draw even
the entire continent into an all-out war.[2]
At the same time, we witness the continued inhumane Zionist ethnic
cleansing of Palestinians, or the "incremental genocide", as it
has been called by the Jewish historian Ilan Pappe,[3] who is one
of the most important historians who substantiated it, and at the
forefront of the few truly anti-Zionist Jews. This is in contrast
to the international Zionist elite[4], who are now busy in passing
fascist inspired "anti-racist" laws into EU parliaments. Thus, a
legally mandatory way of perceiving even historical events such as
the "Holocaust" is introduced, which now must be recognized (with
the threat of imprisonment!) as a historically unique genocide. This
despite the fact that, for example, the genocide of the Armenians
(or the Armenian "Holocaust" as it is sometimes called ) was probably
much more extensive - not to mention the genocide of Indians in the
Americas, Australia etc., which essentially wiped out whole nations!
This is of course an old debate that began in these countries which
introduced first similar legislation, given their involvement or
sympathies to Nazi Germany (i.e. Germany itself, Austria, Switzerland,
France etc) but has now resurfaced given the present EU systematic
effort to force European parliaments to pass similar legislation
(the latest example being Greece). France, in particular, became
infamous when it used such a law to prosecute even the well known
communist and resistance fighter Roger Garaudy as "Holocaust denier",
establishing the fascist principle that historical events are not
subject of historical research and collective memory but a matter to
be dealt with by the state and whoever controls it![5]
The link between all these wars and massacres, but also the
corresponding economic warfare now strangling the Greek people,
the Portuguese, the Spaniards (and currently even the French people
who still resist globalization), is the systematic effort by the TE
running the NWO of neoliberal globalization to integrate all peoples
not yet fully integrated into it. However, despite the nonsense of
the degenerate "Left", which talks about "bad" neoliberal policies etc.
imposed by some "traitors" of social democracy, or the equivalent
nonsense of the Palaeolithic Marxist Left which attempts to "explain"
these wars with the doctrine of "intra-imperialist conflicts" the
consequence Is simply the turn of the popular strata to the patriotic
or nationalist right, if not the far right itself, as we have seen in
the last European elections. The ideological bankruptcy of the 'left'
became evident when it was unable to explain the unprecedented unity of
the TE in supporting all these wars, despite the 'intra-imperialist
conflicts'. Unless, of course, the only imperialisms around are
on the one hand the TE imperialism and on the other the Russian
'imperialism', despite the fact that the Russian Federation has not
begun any imperialist war in its history nor of course controls the
world economy through Transnational Corporations (TNCs), or the world
polity through hundreds of military bases around the world, or finally
the world media, through press corporations and press magnates.
All this, at the very moment when the TE-controlled media are busy
in promοting the myth of Russia bent to conquer the world whereas
any theory about the NWÎ~_ of neolibereal globalization and the TE
running it is dismissed (with the decisive help o the same "Left")
as a conspiracy theory. Unsurprisingly, this "Left" accuses Hollande
for an about turn with respect to his socialist promises forgetting
that his predecessor Mitterand was also forced to do exactly the same
about turn, let alone Oscar Lafontaine in Germany who was forced to
resign when he attempted to introduce economic policies not compatible
with neoliberal globalization.
This is of course because it is now inconceivable for any country
fully integrated into the NWO to implement any different policies
from the universal neoliberal policies. This is not some sort of a
conspiracy,[6] or just a bad ideology implemented by some baddies
(bankers, politicians etc). This is just the inevitable consequence
of opening and liberalizing the markets for capital, commodities
and labour and joining the international institutions controlled by
the TE (WTO, IMF, WB etc) whose job is to impose these policies when
e.g. a member country asks for a loan or to benefit from an investment
program. Needless to add that the dismantling of economic self-reliance
by globalization and the creation of export economies everywhere turns
most countries integrated into the NWO and particularly the weaker
ones into beggars of the TNCs' investment, so that they could avoid
stagnation and borrowing . THerefore, every country knows very well
to whose tune it should dance.
Furthermore, not only are the BRICS (except Russia) completely
integrated into the NWO, without sharing any significant transnational
sovereignty (economic, political, military, cultural and media power at
the transnational level), but even worse, their national sovereignty
is clearly inferior to that of Russia. China, for example, is highly
integrated into the global economy, a fact that has led to a dramatic
increase in inequality in this "socialist" country, since it was
fully integrated into the NWO,[7] whereas its status as an economic
superpower is clearly based on its huge population (the purchasing
power of its GDP per head of the population is 99th in the world)
and the significant industrial and trade power created by the massive
move of TNCs from the TE countries, in the past thirty years or so,
in the pursuit of production cost minimisation and profit maximisation.
The above conclusions about Russia were confirmed also last week at the
NATO Summit, in a Cardiff under occupation by the security services ,
where, discussions were held on how to directly subdue the people in
Eastern Ukraine (who are resisting the junta imposed on them via a
"coup from below' organised by the Transnational Elite) but also
to indirectly subdue the Russian people, the vast majority of whom
support the resistance struggle.
So, the critical decision that will determine the fate not only
of Russia and the Eurasian Union, but of all of us, will be taken
within Russia itself. One option is for the pro-globalization part of
the Russian elite to prevail; the alternative is for the patriotic
anti-globalization part of it to predominate. Which option will be
chosen will determine whether Russia will capitulate to the global
governance of the TE, or whether, instead, it will act as a leader of
an alternative world order of sovereign states based on the Eurasian
Union, as originally conceived, which will aim to achieve national
and economic self-reliance in each country - a prerequisite for any
systemic change in the future ...
Takis Fotopoulos
Takis Fotopoulos is a political philosopher, editor of Society &
Nature/Democracy and Nature/The International Journal of Inclusive
Democracy. He has also been a columnist for the Athens Daily
Eleftherotypia since 1990. Between 1969 and 1989 he was Senior Lecturer
in Economics at the University of North London.
This article is a synthesis of two articles that were first published
in TF's weekly column in Sunday's Eleftherotypia (a Greek daily
published in Athens) on 31/8/2014 and 7//9/2014. The translation into
English was edited by Jonathan Rutherford.
[1] See Takis Fotopoulos, "ISIS role in destruction
of Iraq by transnational elite", RT, 11/7/2014
http://rt.com/op-edge/172084-isis-iraq-destruction-elite/
[2] see Takis Fotopoulos, Ukraine: The attack on Russia and the
Eurasian Union (to be published shortly by Progressive Press).
[3] Ilan Pappe, "Israel's incremental genocide in
the Gaza ghetto", The Electronic Intifada, 13/7/2014
http://electronicintifada.net/content/israels-incremental-genocide-gaza-ghetto/13562
[4] see for the relation between the TE and the Zionist
elite, Takis Fotopoulos, The Zionist Brutalization Within
the New World Order and the Need for a United Multi-national
and Multicultural State*, The International Journal of
INCLUSIVE DEMOCRACY, Vol. 10, Nos. 1/2 (Winter-Summer 2014)
http://www.inclusivedemocracy.org/journal/vol10/vol10_no1-2_The_Zionist_Brutalization_Takis.html
[5] see for a discussion of the issues involved in this sort
of fascist inspiration legislation, Norman Finkelstein, The
Holocaust Industry, (Verso, 2000) and for an older discussion,
Mark Weber, "Switzerland's Anti-Racism Law", The Journal of
Historical Review, July/August 1998 (Vol. 17, No. 4), page 13
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n4p13_Weber.html
[6] see e.g. for a best seller of such a conspiracy theory Naomi Klein,
The Shock Doctrine, (Penguin, 2008)
[7] 'China reveals income gap statistics after 12 year of silence',
RT, 18/1/2013 http://rt.com/business/china-income-gap-reveals-288/
http://english.pravda.ru/world/europe/10-09-2014/128496-nato_chaos-0/