Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Proportion And Reality In An Age Of Mass Slaughter

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Proportion And Reality In An Age Of Mass Slaughter

    PROPORTION AND REALITY IN AN AGE OF MASS SLAUGHTER

    Patheos
    Sept 10 2014

    September 10, 2014
    by Rebecca Hamilton

    I started to use the phrase "age of genocide" in the title for this
    post. But, on reflection, I decided that the word genocide, horrible
    as it is, is actually too small.

    Do we have a word to describe the organized mass slaughters of millions
    of people by governments, and in the case of ISIS, wannabe governments?

    It is not "just" genocide" because, in the case of some of these
    mass slaughterers, such as Stalin, Lenin, Pol Pot and Chairman Mao,
    it was not a slaughter aimed at a discreet group of people so much as
    it was aimed at anyone they could kill. Then we have the slaughtering
    dictators such as Idi Amin, who certainly aimed much of his killing
    at Christians, but also killed quite a few others, as well.

    In fact, finding a "pure" genocide anywhere is way past difficult. The
    Armenian genocide, which wiped out most of the Christian population of
    Turkey (did anyone every wonder why that country is 99% Muslim?) and
    the holocaust the Nazis perpetrated against the Jews, are the closest.

    But the Nazis, even though they clearly stated, intended and nearly
    accomplished the total annihilation of the Jewish people in their
    conquered territories, also murdered whole seminaries of Catholic
    priests, gypsies, homosexuals, Communists, liberals and the disabled.

    The murder of Muslims in Bosnia (which United Nations troops,
    including a lot of Americans, brought to a halt) is another example
    of what might be at least an attempt at pure genocide.

    What we are seeing in the Middle East today is, once again, a lot
    bigger than "just" genocide. Like most genocidal murderers, ISIS is, at
    base, just a bunch of murdering thugs. What that means in terms of what
    they do is that they don't stop at "just" murdering every Christian
    and Yazidi they can kill. They also kill Muslims who don't fit their
    idea of what a "true" Muslim is, and they kill journalists in attempts
    to extort ransom money, and they kill a lot of other people, as well.

    They kill because they are cold-blooded murderers who have created
    a religious excuse for being what they are.

    That's why the term genocide is too small for the organized slaughter
    of innocents that has been taking place all over our globe since the
    turn of the 20th Century. If we limit it to the organized attempts
    to wipe out specific and discreet groups of people within a given
    population, we will ignore the murderous destruction of millions of
    other lives.

    That's how Stalin gets through the genocide sieve. He killed everybody.

    Genocide as a word has a meaning that is too small for the organized
    murdering that we are dealing with in today's world. If that doesn't
    scare you, you probably don't understand it.

    Alongside this murdering fury that is the true hallmark by which our
    times will be remembered in history, are the emotional reactions to
    this savagery from its bystanders.

    Members of the groups which are being slaughtered are often themselves
    under attack or at least somewhat marginalized in the less murderous
    societies in which they live. That was the case with Jews around the
    world when the Nazis were gearing up their killing machine. Even
    American Jews suffered social discrimination in terms of club
    memberships and the names they were called.

    That leads to a frozen-in-place non-response by those who should be
    most equipped to help. Instead of rallying support for their persecuted
    brethren, members of the same group often turn away and ignore their
    plight. That certainly happened with the Jews.

    Then, we have the subtle collaboration of news media and groups
    who do not like their own neighbors who are members of groups being
    persecuted in other lands. That fits the situation with Christian
    persecution. I've experienced myself the aggressive bullying whose
    motive is to silence anyone who talks about Christian persecution.

    I've also witnessed the relative silence about it in the mainstream
    media.

    This is coupled with a group emphasis on anyone who does something
    that can be used to either weaken concern for persecuted Christians
    or to increase public dislike of them.

    Witness the extraordinary emphasis given to the Westboro Baptist
    Church, which is in fact, just about a dozen (or less) individuals
    with signs. You would think, based on what has been written and said
    in certain Christian-bashing circles, that they were the pope speaking
    ex cathedra.

    The same goes for one lone blog post which was written by a grievously
    wrong Christian calling for the classic run-up to genocide against
    Muslims. I'm going to write a full post on that alone as soon as I
    finish writing this one. But before I do that, I want to discuss the
    lack of proportion and reality with which it is being dealt.

    First, in some Christian-bashing circles, their outraged coverage of
    this one blog post from an obscure blog site is the only commentary
    they've made about the mass slaughter of Christians in the Middle
    East. These are often the same people who attack anyone who tries to
    talk about Christian persecution.

    I don't take their outrage seriously because I see it as a targeted
    outrage, designed to create prejudice against Christians and provide
    tacit support for worldwide discrimination against and persecution of
    Christians. I see these bloggers as enablers of violent persecution
    of innocent people.

    Second, we have the reaction of Muslim people who feel beleaguered
    because of the hideous behavior of their co-religionists. See? They
    seem to say. It's not just us.

    No. It's not just them. Psychopathic murderers with government or
    quasi government backing are a widespread phenomena that cross all
    ethnic, religious (or non religious) groups. In light of this reality,
    I think it's time for us to lay down the "It's them!" "It's not just
    us!" nonsense and simply acknowledge that murderers walk among us
    and they will use any excuse to ply their trade.

    And that this the point of this post. Genocide as a word is too small
    for the mass murders we have seen for the past 100 years of human
    history. There is no group of people innocent of these murdering
    rampages.

    If we are going to deal with these mass murders effectively and end
    them, we must begin by looking at them with a sense of proportion
    and in the light of reality. ISIS is nothing more than a gang of
    extortionists and mass murderers. They can dress up in Halloween
    costumes and claim that god is on their side all day long, and it
    will not change the fact that they are cold-blooded, murdering savages
    who have damned themselves before the real God.

    Ditto for every other gang of murdering savages we've seen. Ted Bundy
    we can execute. But when the Ted Bundys of this world get their hands
    on philosophies and government, it takes a bit more than a flip of
    the switch to end them.

    Proportion, applied to ISIS and all their murdering type, requires
    that we stop playing games with mass murder. There are some crimes
    that have to be stopped, and the organized mass murder of innocents
    is one of those crimes. We must not equate everything with this
    one thing. Blog posts can be argued and their ideas scuttled. But
    blog posts, however upsetting, are not the same thing as the actual
    organized murder of innocents on a mass scale.

    Reality requires that we acknowledge that there is no group of people
    who can point their fingers at someone else and claim moral superiority
    in this. Organized mass murder of innocents has become part of the
    human story. If the history of this bloodshed has shown us anything,
    it is that any group of people is capable of it.

    I've referenced the wisdom of Alcoholics Anonymous before when I was
    discussing the self-lies we tell. I will probably do it many times. AA
    has a wisdom in dealing with self-lies that kill.

    You must accept reality on reality's terms.

    That's AA advice for recovering alcoholics and co-dependents. It is
    wisdom for our time.

    http://www.patheos.com/blogs/publiccatholic/2014/09/proportion-and-reality-in-an-age-of-mass-slaughter/


    From: Baghdasarian
Working...
X