Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Armenia's Genocide And Obama's Shame

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Armenia's Genocide And Obama's Shame

    ARMENIA'S GENOCIDE AND OBAMA'S SHAME

    Asia Times Online
    April 23 2015

    Author: David P. Goldman April 22, 2015 2 Comments

    Spengler

    Despite a 2008 campaign promise "to recognize the Armenian genocide,"
    President Obama refuses to follow Pope Francis' example and call the
    murder of 1.5 million Armenian civilians by its right name. Of all
    the despicable things this administration has done, this one stands
    out for vile hypocrisy. CNN reports:

    President Barack Obama, wary of damaging relations with Turkey amid
    growing unrest in the Middle East, won't use the 100th anniversary
    of the massacre of Armenians under the Ottoman Empire to declare the
    brutal episode a genocide.

    Despite Obama's campaign promise in 2008 to "recognize the Armenian
    Genocide" as president, the White House on Tuesday issued a carefully
    worded statement on a high-level administration meeting with Armenian
    groups that avoided using the term "genocide."

    An administration official said Obama, who will mark the centennial
    this Friday, would similarly avoid using the word. The term angers
    Ankara, which denies that Ottoman Turks carried out a genocide.

    "President Obama's surrender to Turkey represents a national disgrace.

    It is, very simply, a betrayal of truth, a betrayal of trust," said Ken
    Hachikian, the chairman of the Armenian National Committee of America.

    Despite the threat of retaliation against Turkey's small and
    defenseless Christian community-the remnant of what once was a fifth
    of the Turkish population-the Vatican has had the courage to use the
    word genocide, and first did so in 2000. Not Obama, whose concern
    for Muslim sensibilities outweighs every other consideration.

    If you don't think telling the truth matters, think again: The world's
    disgusting indifference to the Armenian genocide is what convinced
    Adolf Hitler that he could get away with genocide, too. This is what
    Hitler said about the matter in 1939:

    My decision to attack Poland was arrived at last spring. Originally,
    I feared that the political constellation would compel me to strike
    simultaneously at England, Russia, France, and Poland. Even this risk
    would have had to be taken....Our strength consists in our speed and
    in our brutality. Genghis Khan led millions of women and children to
    slaughter -- with premeditation and a happy heart. History sees in
    him solely the founder of a state. It's a matter of indifference to
    me what a weak western European civilization will say about me.

    I have issued the command -- and I'll have anybody who utters but
    one word of criticism executed by a firing squad -- that our war
    aim does not consist in reaching certain lines, but in the physical
    destruction of the enemy. Accordingly, I have placed my death-head
    formations in readiness -- for the present only in the East -- with
    orders to them to send to death mercilessly and without compassion,
    men, women, and children of Polish derivation and language. Only
    thus shall we gain the living space (Lebensraum)which we need. Who,
    after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?

    43 countries-including Russia, Italyk, France, Sweden Poland and the
    Netherlands-recognize the Armenian genocide. Not the United States
    of America. It is a shame and disgrace.

    http://atimes.com/2015/04/armenias-genocide-and-obamas-shame/

Working...
X