Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BAKU: Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Solution Requires More Efforts

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BAKU: Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Solution Requires More Efforts

    NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT SOLUTION REQUIRES MORE EFFORTS

    AzerNews, Azerbaijan
    Feb 9 2015

    9 February 2015, 17:53 (GMT+04:00)
    By Mushvig Mehdiyev

    The resolution process of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between
    Armenia and Azerbaijan is becoming more actual requiring more
    involvement of the world's influential organizations amid the recent
    Armenia-triggered skirmishes on the contact line and border of the
    two neighboring countries.

    The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, a mediator
    in the peace talks over the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, has expressed
    its serious concerns over the latest skirmishes on the contact line
    of the Armenian and Azerbaijani troops.

    The OSCE leadership and Minsk Group co-chairs gathered on February
    7 to discuss the latest developments in the Nagorno-Karabakh peace
    process, according to the OSCE press service.

    As a result of the high-level meeting, the OSCE released a statement
    to admit that the military situation along the contact line and
    Armenia-Azerbaijan border is deteriorating, posing a threat to regional
    stability and endangering the civilians' lives.

    "Kasprzyk's monitoring reports in January said about 12 people were
    killed and 18 others wounded. This is the highest confirmed number
    of victims in the first month of a year since the ceasefire agreement
    signed in 1994. Approximately 60 people lost their lives in 2014.

    Since then the disturbing trend has been continuing," the statement
    said.

    The OSCE excluded any military solution to the conflict, calling on
    the sides to end incursions, stop targeting villages and civilians,
    halt retaliatory attacks and use of asymmetric force, and take
    additional steps to reduce tensions.

    It said the partial observation of the security guarantees during
    the OSCE monitoring exercises was unacceptable.

    The Minsk Group co-chairs, with the full support of the
    chairperson-in-office, are preparing to host an intensified negotiation
    process that can lead to a peaceful end to the conflict that has
    scarred the region for too long.

    "We strongly urge the sides to strengthen the political will to begin
    this process immediately without any preconditions," the OSCE said.

    Earlier, the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs held meetings with Azerbaijani
    Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov and Armenian Foreign Minister
    Edward Nalbandian.

    They called for the resumption of presidential dialogue, as it was
    said in a statement issued after the meeting with Nalbandian in Munich
    on 5 February.

    "We urged the minister to show more flexibility to kick off such
    negotiations," the co-chairs said.

    Mediators also emphasized the importance of implementing the
    presidents' agreement on how exchanging the data on missing persons
    under the aegis of the International Committee of the Red Cross.

    "This data exchange can build a trust between the sides and facilitate
    the reconciliation process. Moreover, we call for the resumption of
    presidential dialogue at the earliest opportunity," they noted.

    The co-chairs are expected to travel to the region in late February.

    As the efforts by the OSCE Minsk Group have brought no tangible
    results so far, authorities and individual diplomats from different
    countries have started to emphasize the significance of solving the
    Karabakh knot.

    Pascal Monnier, French Ambassador to Azerbaijan, said it was important
    not to consider the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh as a dispute to
    last forever.

    He said the conflict in Ukraine should not sideline the dispute over
    Nagorno-Karabakh region.

    Monnier noted that the mediation in the conflict's settlement is
    neither a tribunal nor a court. It is the way of using all the
    techniques available by the diplomats and experts in confidence
    building, conflict resolution, and post-crisis management.

    "The Minsk Group co-chairs cannot decide for the presidents in terms
    of what is acceptable for them and the people of the region," he said.

    Monnier noted that France urges, by all means, both presidents and
    both countries to start a dialogue and avoid any measures threatening
    this dialogue.

    Armenia is unlikely happy with the status-quo, said Monnier.

    "As we know, Armenia is occupying a lot of territories, seven
    districts, and also controlling Nagorno-Karabakh. If we consider
    the economic situation of Armenia, we don't have an impression that
    Armenia is getting a lot from the existing situation," he said.

    Monnier believes that Armenia would get more if peace is restored.

    "This year is a very important year in terms of the conflict's
    resolution. Of course, 2015 could appear more complicated for the
    EU because of the Ukraine crisis and ISIS threats. But it is not a
    reason to be inactive, we will continue to be active," he said.

    Asked about the inclusion of Germany in the OSCE Minsk Group co-chair
    countries, Monnier said Germany as a government is supporting the
    Minsk Group co-chairs, as does the European Union.

    Monnier believes that the co-chairing group is the appropriate body
    to find a peaceful and lasting solution to the conflict.

    "I don't think that there is debate in Europe on this subject,"
    he said.

    "The Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh is a matter
    of concern for all the nations because it violates the stability in
    the region and also prevents economic integration of the region,
    and it also puts a negative impact on everyone. I think that any
    concrete support of any member states to the conflict's settlement
    is welcomed," Monnier added.

    The Azerbaijani leadership is not satisfied with the poor activity of
    the OSCE Minsk Group in the two-decade negotiation process, accusing
    the mediator structure of remaining indifferent particularly when it
    comes to illegal presence of the Armenian army in Nagorno-Karabakh.

    Despite regular statements on unacceptability of the status quo in
    the conflict, the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs has failed to contribute
    to the solution of protracted problem. Furthermore, the organization
    lack any action plan, or means of impact to achieve solution to the
    conflict, which frequently gives birth to ideas about replacing it
    with more effective format.

    Armenia keeps under control over 20 percent of Azerbaijani territory,
    avoiding fulfilling four UN Security Council resolutions on immediate
    withdrawal from the occupied lands and in fact facing no pressure.

    This comes as other standards are applied in another part of Europe -
    in Ukraine - to prevent aggression.

    Such approaches towards the conflict solution are sometimes interpreted
    as double standards, apparently used by certain forces to enforce
    their power in the region.

    Based on international law Azerbaijan prioritizes the withdrawal of
    Armenian forces from its internationally recognized territory as a key
    condition to move forward. Despite its strong army and capabilities to
    liberate its occupied lands, Azerbaijani authorities opt for peaceful
    end to the two-decade long conflict.

    Armenia captured Nagorno-Karabakh and seven surrounding districts from
    Azerbaijan in a war that followed the Soviet breakup in 1991. More than
    20,000 Azerbaijanis were killed and nearly 1 million were displaced
    as a result of the war ending in occupation of Azerbaijan's 20 percent
    historical and internationally recognized lands.

    http://www.azernews.az/azerbaijan/77354.html

Working...
X