Tweet
MOSCOW REVEALS WHAT NON-GOVERNMENT WAS NEEDED FOR
Lragir.am
Politics - 27 February 2015, 13:54
After the recent domestic developments interviews with Russian
experts appeared in the Armenian press who stated that Russia does
not interfere with Armenia's domestic issues. They also state that
it is all the same to Moscow who will be the government of Armenia
unless it does not conduct the policy that Russia needs.
Most importantly, however, with regard to the so-called non-government
of Armenia, they are stating bluntly that it was necessary to keep
the Armenian government within Russia's political interests. In other
words, the non-governmental format was leverage on the government,
and had the latter conducted a policy against Russia's interests,
particularly of integration with Western organizations, there would
be a change of government in Armenia with the help of Moscow.
Of course, the Russian experts are not saying something new because the
Armenian political and media circles have dwelt on this circumstance
in detail. Besides, the non-governmental forces did not hide that
they serve Russia's interests.
The problem is different. Moscow actually confirms this, thereby
giving up on its agents to some extent. One of the signs of this was
the statement of one of the Kremlin's spokespersons that the Armenian
non-government are "clowns" if they wish to come to government and
maintain the oligarchic system with Moscow's help. This was followed
by the famous developments and Serzh Sargsyan's statement on refraining
from turning the political field to a circus.
Apparently, Moscow has achieved its goal in Armenia or certain problems
have occurred that have forced the governments of Armenia and Russia
to give up on clownery. Why have the Russians openly given up on the
non-government will become known in the future or will not become
known at all due to some subtleties.
The point is whether the non-governmental forces are aware how the
forces serving the interests of another state's goals and interests
are referred to in history and political science. After all, do they
know how they are eventually treated at home and outside the country?
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/politics/view/33695#sthash.AmkokG61.dpuf
From: Baghdasarian
Lragir.am
Politics - 27 February 2015, 13:54
After the recent domestic developments interviews with Russian
experts appeared in the Armenian press who stated that Russia does
not interfere with Armenia's domestic issues. They also state that
it is all the same to Moscow who will be the government of Armenia
unless it does not conduct the policy that Russia needs.
Most importantly, however, with regard to the so-called non-government
of Armenia, they are stating bluntly that it was necessary to keep
the Armenian government within Russia's political interests. In other
words, the non-governmental format was leverage on the government,
and had the latter conducted a policy against Russia's interests,
particularly of integration with Western organizations, there would
be a change of government in Armenia with the help of Moscow.
Of course, the Russian experts are not saying something new because the
Armenian political and media circles have dwelt on this circumstance
in detail. Besides, the non-governmental forces did not hide that
they serve Russia's interests.
The problem is different. Moscow actually confirms this, thereby
giving up on its agents to some extent. One of the signs of this was
the statement of one of the Kremlin's spokespersons that the Armenian
non-government are "clowns" if they wish to come to government and
maintain the oligarchic system with Moscow's help. This was followed
by the famous developments and Serzh Sargsyan's statement on refraining
from turning the political field to a circus.
Apparently, Moscow has achieved its goal in Armenia or certain problems
have occurred that have forced the governments of Armenia and Russia
to give up on clownery. Why have the Russians openly given up on the
non-government will become known in the future or will not become
known at all due to some subtleties.
The point is whether the non-governmental forces are aware how the
forces serving the interests of another state's goals and interests
are referred to in history and political science. After all, do they
know how they are eventually treated at home and outside the country?
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/politics/view/33695#sthash.AmkokG61.dpuf
From: Baghdasarian