Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A well Turkophile Constitutional Council?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A well Turkophile Constitutional Council?

    A well Turkophile Constitutional Council?

    Saturday, January 3rd, 2015 at 16:00 | Read 1978 times I
    ANNE DASTAKIAN


    In its first issue of 2015, the New Armenian Magazine published a
    survey that reveals a disturbing email exchange between the French
    Hubert Haenel, former senator and member of the Constitutional
    Council, and Turkish Yasar Yakis, former Minister of Foreign Affairs,
    ardent Francophile, and Turkish lobbyist in France.

    The little dance between young FN and UMP to spend the New Year

    Nicolas Sarkozy has never defended secularism

    Nationalizations in Italy Renzi made the policy that Holland is unable

    In its first issue in 2015, the centennial year of the Armenian
    Genocide of 1915, still officially unrecognized by Turkey, Armenia
    News magazine , (NAM), the largest French newspaper dedicated to
    Armenia, published investigated the least disturbing. An exchange of
    messages (see below) from February 2012 between the French Hubert
    Haenel, former senator and member of the Constitutional Council, and
    Turkish Yasar Yakis, former Foreign Minister, ardent Francophile, and
    Turkish lobbyist in France tends to prove much dangerous liaisons
    between our "wise" in principle independent and guarantors of the
    French Constitution, and a prominent foreign influences agent. The
    exchange took place at the time of the invalidation, February 28,
    2012, by the Constitutional Council, the Boyer law that sought to
    punish "genocide negationism not recognized France" , in short, the
    Armenian genocide.

    >From a discussion group on Yahoo always accessible Internet end of
    2014, the exchange speaks for itself. 1 st February Yasar Yakis Haenel
    wrote that he is " relieved that we were able to achieve the required
    number of signatures for the use of the Constitutional Council for the
    law criminalizing the Armenian Genocide . " remedies he thinks he has
    " definitely changed the direction of the tide . " No wonder, of
    course, by the lobbyist of a state whose foreign policy strives to
    deny the elimination of over a million Armenians in the Ottoman Empire
    a century ago. One can be surprised by against the response of the
    "wise" to the French " Well dear friend: Like you I share this
    relief. We have 30 days to decide the fate threw in. I can not say
    more. I'll keep you posted . "

    On February 28, the day the verdict is even before the publication of
    the result of the deliberations of the Council qu'Haenel tells him the
    good news. " As if he was accountable to Turkish leader , "said Ara
    Toranian, director of NAM and author of the article, which states that
    Yasar Yakis had notably led, in April 2011, a delegation of elected
    Turkish came to France to plead with Nicolas Sarkozy's view of Ankara
    on a bill Holocaust denial of the PS, which was ultimately rejected, a
    few days later by the Senate.

    Whatever one thinks of the Boyer Act, and Marianne, remember, was not
    in favor, one can only be moved with the NAM, the contents of this
    exchange of mails that casts afterwards, a serious doubt on the
    impartiality circumstances in which the decision was taken by the
    Constitutional Council. At the time, already the Chained Duck revealed
    the Turkophile commitment Hubert Haenel, an active member of the
    Institute of the Bosphorus supported by Ankara. Regrettably, finally,
    that the NAM did not attempt to verify the authenticity of this
    exchange of mails from both interested. Relaying section of NAM, we
    offer them the opportunity.


    http://www.marianne.net/Un-Conseil-constitutionnel-bien-turcophile_a243601.html


    From: Baghdasarian
Working...
X