Tweet
WITH ALEPPO ENCIRCLED, WEST SEEKS WILDCARD TO SAVE ITS TERROR HORDES
23.01.2015 Author: Tony Cartalucci
The Syrian Arab Army is reportedly close to completely encircling
militants that have occupied the northern city of Aleppo since they
invaded it from NATO territory in 2012. Once the encirclement is
complete, analysts believe the the city will be finally liberated,
in a process similar to the retaking of Homs further south.
The desperation of militants facing this final phase in the Battle for
Aleppo is indicated by their Western sponsors' attempts to broker a
ceasefire and arrange "aid" to reach them. Similar attempts were made
in vain during the closing phases in the Battle for Homs in mid-2014 -
with the city of Homs having been an epicenter of terrorist activity
beginning in 2011, and now under the control of the Syrian government.
Small pockets of militants have been isolated within Homs, allowing
order to be restored across the majority of the city and the
surrounding region.
As the Syrian government systematically regains control of a nation
up-ended by Western-backed terrorists flooding the country accompanied
by a seemingly inexhaustible torrent of cash, weapons, and equipment,
the desperation of these Western interests has visibly increased.
The Guardian, chief among the many propagandists distorting the
conflict since it began in 2011, is now attempting to form a narrative
extorting global security by claiming only by NATO establishing a
no-fly-zone over Aleppo and repelling Syrian government forces, can
"moderate rebels" hold on to the city and repel lingering "Islamic
State" (ISIS) forces.
In a report titled, "Syrian rebels prepare to defend ruined Aleppo
as troops and militias close in," the Guardian claims:
Since then the regime's incremental gains have been hard fought,
with most inroads being pushed back by rebel fighters and locals,
both still reeling from their losses of manpower in the war with Isis.
Meanwhile Isis has lurked 20 miles away, taunting the Islamic Front
with a radio station it has set up that regularly plays Islamic chants
insulting the group's members.
"They were strategic [losses] for us," said the Aleppo commander of
the gains by Isis. "And [yet] the Americans doubt our commitment to
fighting them? When [the US] came back to Syria, we thought the least
they could do is to stop Assad's air force from flying. But they have
bombed the city more than at any time before the Americans arrived. Of
course we believe they have a deal with the regime. It is obvious."
Of course the reality is that the US has merely used ISIS as a pretext
to violate Syrian airspace, with the next step being to establish
long-planned no-fly-zones, if possible, to thwart the Syrian Arab
Army. Just as in Libya, the no-fly-zone would simply hand the rest of
Syria over to ISIS and other Al Qaeda affiliates - clearly the most
dominate militant force engaged in fighting the Syrian government,
and clearly the recipients of the vast majority of material support
supplied by NATO and their regional partners, most notably Saudi
Arabia, Qatar, and Israel.
The fight for Zahraa, one of the few Shia enclaves in northern Syria,
is being led by the al-Qaida-aligned Jabhat al-Nusra, with whom the
Islamic Front have an understanding but no formal alliance. After
barely holding ground for much of the past year, al-Nusra recently
seized large chunks of territory near the Turkish border, reasserting
itself as a power player at the expense of non-jihadist groups. The
fast-changing dynamic is forcing a new reckoning with the Islamic
Front, which says it has waited fruitlessly for help from Arab
states that was promised but never delivered.It should be noted,
that while the Guardian claims the remaining encircled militants
in Aleppo are at odds with ISIS, the same report admits these same
militants coordinate with US State Department listed foreign terrorist
organization, Al Nusra. The Guardian would admit:
These same ISIS forces that are allegedly at odds with "moderate
rebels" have seen thousands of so-called "moderates" defecting into
their ranks recently bringing with them large sums of Western cash and
weapons. That Al Qaeda - both Al Nusra and ISIS - seems to thrive along
the Turkish border indicates that NATO support is not at all going
to "moderate rebels," but instead, intentionally to Al Qaeda, or to
moderate groups NATO knows is working with, or soon to join Al Qaeda.
With a menace of the its own creation - perpetuated to this day
and thriving along the borders of NATO, seeking safe-haven in NATO
territory and receiving an uninterrupted line of supplies from NATO
territory with absolute impunity - the West seeks to extort from
the world through fear of ISIS' spread, greater direct military
intervention, up to and including no-fly-zones, and perhaps more
muscular policies including the carving out of "safe havens" within
which ISIS can stage larger and more effective military operations
deeper into Syria.
As exposed in 2007 by two-time Pulitzer Prize winner and veteran
journalist Seymour Hersh in his New Yorker report titled, "The
Redirection," the West conspired to intentionally build up and unleash
terrorist mercenaries affiliated with Al Qaeda across the Arab World
to fight a proxy war against Iran and its growing arc of influence. US
support was to be laundered through Saudi Arabia as to maintain a
veneer of plausible deniability and operational compartmentalization.
Clearly, what is unfolding in Syria today, is the verbatim
manifestation of Hersh's meticulous, 9-page report.
To confound this criminal conspiracy, Syria and its allies must ensure
that the ongoing conflict is exposed as a terrorist invasion, not a
"civil war," and that any strategy formulated to combat this terrorist
scourge must include the Syrian government - demonstrably the most
capable force confronting Al Qaeda in the Levant since 2011. Thus,
the more aid the West and its regional allies supply this terrorist
front with, the greater support Syria has upon the global stage to
fight it - painting Western foreign policy into a corner, and allowing
Syrians to finally restore order to their besieged nation.
Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer,
especially for the online magazine"New Eastern Outlook".
First
appeared:http://journal-neo.org/2015/01/23/with-aleppo-encircled-west-seeks-wildcard-to-save-its-terror-hordes/?fb_ref=Default&fb_source=message
23.01.2015 Author: Tony Cartalucci
The Syrian Arab Army is reportedly close to completely encircling
militants that have occupied the northern city of Aleppo since they
invaded it from NATO territory in 2012. Once the encirclement is
complete, analysts believe the the city will be finally liberated,
in a process similar to the retaking of Homs further south.
The desperation of militants facing this final phase in the Battle for
Aleppo is indicated by their Western sponsors' attempts to broker a
ceasefire and arrange "aid" to reach them. Similar attempts were made
in vain during the closing phases in the Battle for Homs in mid-2014 -
with the city of Homs having been an epicenter of terrorist activity
beginning in 2011, and now under the control of the Syrian government.
Small pockets of militants have been isolated within Homs, allowing
order to be restored across the majority of the city and the
surrounding region.
As the Syrian government systematically regains control of a nation
up-ended by Western-backed terrorists flooding the country accompanied
by a seemingly inexhaustible torrent of cash, weapons, and equipment,
the desperation of these Western interests has visibly increased.
The Guardian, chief among the many propagandists distorting the
conflict since it began in 2011, is now attempting to form a narrative
extorting global security by claiming only by NATO establishing a
no-fly-zone over Aleppo and repelling Syrian government forces, can
"moderate rebels" hold on to the city and repel lingering "Islamic
State" (ISIS) forces.
In a report titled, "Syrian rebels prepare to defend ruined Aleppo
as troops and militias close in," the Guardian claims:
Since then the regime's incremental gains have been hard fought,
with most inroads being pushed back by rebel fighters and locals,
both still reeling from their losses of manpower in the war with Isis.
Meanwhile Isis has lurked 20 miles away, taunting the Islamic Front
with a radio station it has set up that regularly plays Islamic chants
insulting the group's members.
"They were strategic [losses] for us," said the Aleppo commander of
the gains by Isis. "And [yet] the Americans doubt our commitment to
fighting them? When [the US] came back to Syria, we thought the least
they could do is to stop Assad's air force from flying. But they have
bombed the city more than at any time before the Americans arrived. Of
course we believe they have a deal with the regime. It is obvious."
Of course the reality is that the US has merely used ISIS as a pretext
to violate Syrian airspace, with the next step being to establish
long-planned no-fly-zones, if possible, to thwart the Syrian Arab
Army. Just as in Libya, the no-fly-zone would simply hand the rest of
Syria over to ISIS and other Al Qaeda affiliates - clearly the most
dominate militant force engaged in fighting the Syrian government,
and clearly the recipients of the vast majority of material support
supplied by NATO and their regional partners, most notably Saudi
Arabia, Qatar, and Israel.
The fight for Zahraa, one of the few Shia enclaves in northern Syria,
is being led by the al-Qaida-aligned Jabhat al-Nusra, with whom the
Islamic Front have an understanding but no formal alliance. After
barely holding ground for much of the past year, al-Nusra recently
seized large chunks of territory near the Turkish border, reasserting
itself as a power player at the expense of non-jihadist groups. The
fast-changing dynamic is forcing a new reckoning with the Islamic
Front, which says it has waited fruitlessly for help from Arab
states that was promised but never delivered.It should be noted,
that while the Guardian claims the remaining encircled militants
in Aleppo are at odds with ISIS, the same report admits these same
militants coordinate with US State Department listed foreign terrorist
organization, Al Nusra. The Guardian would admit:
These same ISIS forces that are allegedly at odds with "moderate
rebels" have seen thousands of so-called "moderates" defecting into
their ranks recently bringing with them large sums of Western cash and
weapons. That Al Qaeda - both Al Nusra and ISIS - seems to thrive along
the Turkish border indicates that NATO support is not at all going
to "moderate rebels," but instead, intentionally to Al Qaeda, or to
moderate groups NATO knows is working with, or soon to join Al Qaeda.
With a menace of the its own creation - perpetuated to this day
and thriving along the borders of NATO, seeking safe-haven in NATO
territory and receiving an uninterrupted line of supplies from NATO
territory with absolute impunity - the West seeks to extort from
the world through fear of ISIS' spread, greater direct military
intervention, up to and including no-fly-zones, and perhaps more
muscular policies including the carving out of "safe havens" within
which ISIS can stage larger and more effective military operations
deeper into Syria.
As exposed in 2007 by two-time Pulitzer Prize winner and veteran
journalist Seymour Hersh in his New Yorker report titled, "The
Redirection," the West conspired to intentionally build up and unleash
terrorist mercenaries affiliated with Al Qaeda across the Arab World
to fight a proxy war against Iran and its growing arc of influence. US
support was to be laundered through Saudi Arabia as to maintain a
veneer of plausible deniability and operational compartmentalization.
Clearly, what is unfolding in Syria today, is the verbatim
manifestation of Hersh's meticulous, 9-page report.
To confound this criminal conspiracy, Syria and its allies must ensure
that the ongoing conflict is exposed as a terrorist invasion, not a
"civil war," and that any strategy formulated to combat this terrorist
scourge must include the Syrian government - demonstrably the most
capable force confronting Al Qaeda in the Levant since 2011. Thus,
the more aid the West and its regional allies supply this terrorist
front with, the greater support Syria has upon the global stage to
fight it - painting Western foreign policy into a corner, and allowing
Syrians to finally restore order to their besieged nation.
Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer,
especially for the online magazine"New Eastern Outlook".
First
appeared:http://journal-neo.org/2015/01/23/with-aleppo-encircled-west-seeks-wildcard-to-save-its-terror-hordes/?fb_ref=Default&fb_source=message