Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Serious Trends Of Geopolitical Changes In South Caucasus Lead To Cla

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Serious Trends Of Geopolitical Changes In South Caucasus Lead To Cla

    SERIOUS TRENDS OF GEOPOLITICAL CHANGES IN SOUTH CAUCASUS LEAD TO CLASHES AND REDRAWING OF BORDERS

    ArmInfo's Interview with Zhirayr Sefilyan, Coordinator of the Founding
    Parliament Movement Secretariat, leader of the "Centennial Without
    the Regime" Movement, Commander of the special battalion of Shushi

    by David Stepanyan

    Monday, March 9, 16:14

    The results of the intra-power confrontation between the Republican
    Party of Armenia and the Prosperous Armenia Party are obvious. Who
    do you think can occupy the vacant place of the system opposition?

    Actually, there is no opposition in the political system of Armenia.

    We see the system becoming more and more homogeneous. From now on,
    the "opposition" will only include small, poorly organized forces,
    which will regularly set up unstable "unions". These processes will be
    managed by the rules set by the head of the incumbent regime, which
    will retain all the key levers. He will always be able to punish the
    "oppositionists" who violate the rules or to destroy the "unions"
    created by the "oppositionists". The distortion of Armenia's political
    system has approached 100%. This means that the regime will keep
    robbing the country, making the people migrate and it will choose
    the direction leading to cession of Artsakh and sovereignty. The
    "opposition" will only imitate a political fight and mislead the
    people. In fact, the intra-system "opposition" is turning from a
    junior partner into a power representative for miserable wages. As
    long as Armenia is colonized, this will go on at the expense of our
    national interests. Therefore, being engaged in the processes inside
    the system runs counter to the interests of our nation and state. In
    this light, the people should become politically organized outside
    the system, liquidate the ruling regime and improve the system. Our
    movement has been working for many years to attain that goal. The
    Founding Parliament, which was set up on Jan 10, will shortly
    become a representative body to express the people's will. The
    Founding Parliament will replace the ruling regime after the former
    liquidates the latter. The formation of the Founding Parliament is
    not accomplished yet; our doors are open to all honest and fighting
    people. We have already announced that we will launch the process of
    liquidation of the regime on April 24 by means of civil disobedience.

    The opponents of the Founding Parliament regularly criticize the
    "Centennial Without the Regime" Movement for the intention to use
    April 24 for domestic political purposes. Could you tell me the real
    motive of the Movement and the agenda for April 24?

    The statements suggesting that our movement looks to use April 24 for
    domestic policy purposes are either delusion or false presentation
    of facts by the incumbent authorities. We must take into account
    Armenia's colonization. In such countries, there can be one type of
    fight - national-liberation. Such countries lack a political system.

    Consequently, in such countries, there can be no domestic political
    confrontation between political parties. The true motive of our
    movement meets the national interests - upheaval of April 24 and use
    of the energy that day for the noble goal of creating a nation-state.

    It is high time for the people to realize that without a nation-state
    they are doomed to new genocides and are now suffering 'white'
    genocide. Therefore, April 24 must help us stop the ongoing genocide
    and prevent new ones. Perceiving April 24 exclusively as a mourning
    and commemoration day is devastating for the people. April 24 must
    mark the start of revival, restoration of justice and establishment
    of the national statehood. We are not going to take any steps that
    would impede the April 24 events. We will visit the Genocide Memorial
    to give tribute to the victims. However, we will use the other part
    of the day to build a nation-sate.

    Why do you think the Artsakh authorities displayed an unreasonable
    attitude to the car rally participants in Berdzor?

    Artsakh is the knot tying Armenia to the cart of colonization. Our
    movement reveals that knot, grounds the need to undo it and at the
    same time demonstrates how to do it. In the meantime, that knot is
    a viable issue for the head of the ruling regime in Armenia and its
    vicars in Stepanakert. This is how we explain the violence against
    the Founding Parliament in Berdzor. The authorities of Armenia and
    the NKR are the worthy successors of their spiritual parent, sadly
    remembered Boris Kevorkov, who openly declared the inadmissibility
    of the Karabakh movement in 1988 because "Karabakh was the status of
    his life". Later we saw Kevorkov's weakness. His successors will also
    shortly lose their levers of governing.

    One of the RPA parliamentarians blamed the Founding Parliament for
    "receiving funding from Azerbaijan and Turkey". I am well aware of your
    opinion about foreign sources of funding for political movements and
    parties. Nevertheless, what do you think this provocation was aimed at?

    A three-stage plan to ruin our movement was developed before the
    car rally to Artsakh. The plan was as follows: demonization of our
    movement before the car rally, violence against the participants and
    justification of that violence. It became evident later that the
    violence planned against us was to have more grave consequences -
    murders or arrests - but it did not happen due to our well-organized
    actions. To justify the demonization of the movement and violence
    against it, a special propaganda was launched and the necessary
    actors - political, secret and information - were chosen for that. The
    parliamentarian makes provocative statements to fulfill his part of
    the plan.

    Russia's unclear response to the Gyumri tragedy and continuous supply
    of arms to Azerbaijan, the enemy of Russia's "strategic ally" Armenia
    create a situation demonstrating upcoming radical changes in the
    regional geopolitics. Some experts think that one of the components
    of these changes will be the withdrawal of the 102nd military base
    from Armenia. What do you think of the latest geopolitical changes
    in the region?

    We advocate allied relations, including strategic ones, and we are
    convinced that they should be based on the principles of equality and
    mutual benefits. They should not affect the dignity or sovereignty
    of either of the parties. A strategic ally should not arm the enemy
    of its ally. Such a behavior of a strategic ally is unacceptable to us.

    On the other hand, it is important for us to ensure Armenia's defensive
    capacity with our own efforts. Allied relations are desirable, however,
    the allies' support should be secondary. One should not build the
    country's security system relying on the force of another country,
    even an ally. In the meantime, the serious trends of geopolitical
    changes in the South Caucasus lead to clashes, redrawing of borders,
    changes in the foreign forces' influence on the region.

    Armenia should stop being a passive observer. It should become an
    independent subject. In that case, Armenia will be able not only
    to avoid getting in the way of the high and mighties and turning
    into a small coin, but also to become a full-fledged participant in
    these trends and to turn into a regional factor using the results
    of the forthcoming perturbations. For that purpose we need at
    least to become a bridge on the Iran-Armenia-Georgia-Europe and
    Iran-Armenia-Georgia-Russia axes. To perform that task, in 1988-94
    we were able to liberate Artsakh and create premises for close ties
    with Iran. However, the problem cannot be resolved completely without
    Nakhijevan and its communication capacities. Given the unrealistic
    nature of the project on construction of a railway via Syunik, the
    priority is to establish Armenian control over Nakhijevan in the light
    of the upcoming regional impulses. Here we have also a very important,
    crucial circumstance - a new generation, which has been formed over
    the years of independence, as well as a developing healthy, viable
    and sovereign political generation in Armenia and Diaspora. When
    developing and conducting a policy, the foreign forces and we should
    take this circumstance into consideration.

    http://www.arminfo.am/index.cfm?objectid=3455EF30-C65E-11E4-969A0EB7C0D21663



    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X