Tweet
OBAMA ADMINISTRATION INSULTS MEMORY OF ARMENIAN HOLOCAUST
Front Page Magazine
March 18 2015
March 18, 2015 by Stephen Brown
Next month, Armenians worldwide will mark the centennial of the
Armenian Holocaust that saw 1.5 million of their people perish
barbarically at the hands of the Ottoman Turks in a jihad that is
continuing today under the Islamic State. This destruction of the
Armenians in Anatolia, where they had lived for several thousand years,
was also the event that gave Hitler reason to believe he could get
away with exterminating Jews, Poles and Gypsies.
"Who still remembers today the annihilation of the Armenians?" the
Nazi leader reportedly said.
The trauma of 1915 left deep scars on the Armenian psyche, similar
to those the Nazi Holocaust made on that of the world's Jews. As
a result, one would think the Obama administration would show an
increased sensitivity regarding the killing of Armenians, especially
by Muslim enemies, and more especially in view of the approaching
Armenian Holocaust's centenary in April. But only last month,
US Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs
Victoria Nuland urged Armenian authorities to make "a humanitarian
gesture" and release two Azeri terrorists who had crossed the border
from Azerbaijan and murdered two people, one a 17-year-old. A third
Armenian, a woman, was badly wounded.
"Such humanitarian gestures have been shown to reduce tensions
and build trust between the sides. So that's what she (Nuland) was
referring to," said a state department spokeswoman later at a press
briefing, in explaining the assistant secretary's controversial
remarks.
Nuland was in Azerbaijan, the second stop of her tour of the Caucuses
Mountains, when she made the "humanitarian gesture" comment, having
previously visited Georgia. In Azerbaijan, Nuland also said she
would take up the matter of releasing the two imprisoned Azeris when
she visited Armenia, her next and last stop. Armenia and Azerbaijan
are both former Soviet republics in the southern Caucuses Mountains,
who now face each other over a closed, hostile border. Armed clashes
occur there now almost daily and deaths have occurred. The military
confrontation between the two Caucasian nations has recently become
so heated, it is feared armed conflict could break out.
The cause of the enmity between Christian Armenia and Azerbaijan, a
Turkic-speaking, Muslim-majority country, was an undeclared war fought
from 1988 to 1994 over Nagorno-Karabakh, an Armenian enclave inside
of Azerbaijan that sought secession and reunification with Armenia in
the dying days of the Soviet empire. The Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians,
perceiving themselves as victims of the Soviet Union's nationalities
policy, believed they were righting a historical wrong. In 1921, the
Bolsheviks had first awarded the enclave to Armenia but later reversed
that decision, giving it to Azerbaijan, even though the population,
according to an early Soviet census, was 95 percent Armenian. Stalin
was reportedly responsible for this fateful, and disastrous, decision
reversal.
During the conflict, both sides engaged in ethnic cleansing. According
to authors Caroline Cox and John Eibner, Azeris cleared 40,000
Armenians out of Kirovabad, Azerbaijan's second-largest city, in 1988
in response to Nagorno-Karabakh's secession drive. Another Azeri pogrom
against Armenians, in which 32 were killed, preceded this in Sumgait,
followed by another in Baku, Azerbaijan's capital.
"The Armenians were not quick to retaliate to the Sumgait massacre,"
wrote Cox and Eibner in their 1993-published book Ethnic Cleansing In
Progress: War In Nagorno-Karabakh. "But Armenian restraint crumbled in
response to the Kirovabad pogrom and the anti-Armenian demonstrations
in Baku."
In the war itself, the outnumbered Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians, with
assistance from neighboring Armenia, not only won their independence,
defeating the Azeri forces, they also conquered some adjoining
Azeri territory, which they still hold today. With the victory,
Nagorno-Karabakh renamed itself Artsakh (its ancient name when
an Armenian kingdom), and became an independent state, recognised
internationally, however, by few others. These diplomatic difficulties
have also prevented Artsakh from joining Armenia, although the two
are closely entwined.
Until now, Artsakh has refused to return the Azeri territory it
occupies until it can be guaranteed that it will not be used to stage
attacks on its land. In this respect, Nagorno-Karabakh has adopted
a position similar to Israel's regarding the Arab territories it
captured in 1967: it will trade land for peace.
Azerbaijan's ally, Turkey, which is located on Armenia's western
border, became so incensed when the Artsakh forces were winning that
it threatened to attack Armenia, although it was not officially a
combatant. Apparently, Turkey is not content with having murdered
1.5 million Armenians a hundred years ago and wants to continue this
homicidal tradition in this century. A Turkish military assault on
Armenia would be like Germany attacking Israel today.
However, a warning from the Kremlin that a Turkish attack on Armenia
would mean war with Russia caused Turkey to climb down, thus averting
a regional conflict. In the end, to save face, all Turkey could do
was seal its border with Armenia as well. This closure has lasted now
22 years, severely disrupting the Armenian economy. And incredibly,
while trying its best to strangle Armenia, Turkey has hypocritically
complained about Israel's blockade of Gaza.
So it is against this background of war, genocide, ethnic cleansing
and ancient hatreds that Nuland called upon Armenian authorities to
make a "humanitarian gesture" and release the murderers. The two
Azeri terrorists were found guilty in a Republic of Artsakh court
after an "open and transparent trial," and received prison sentences
of life and 22 years respectively. One of the charges that formed the
conviction was "murder committed by an organised group motivated by
ethnic hatred." Artsakh security forces killed a third Azeri terrorist
belonging to the group. None of the three, Azerbaijan claims, are
members of its military.
Although Artsakh is recognised by four American state governments,
the most recent being California in 2014, the federal government
continues to deny it diplomatic recognition. As a result, Nuland
did not talk with Artsakh authorities when in Armenia. Instead,
she met with the Armenian foreign minister and visited the Armenian
Holocaust memorial in Yerevan. But Nuland's talks with Armenian
officials concerning the two Azeri terrorists yielded no results.
This was to be expected. Armenians well remember the terrible injustice
and humiliation inflicted on them when the Hungarian government
released early from prison an Azeri military officer, Rami Safarov,
who had killed Armenian officer, Lt. Gurgen Markarian, in his sleep
with an axe in 2004 in Budapest. Both were attending a North Atlantic
Treaty Organization-sponsored event at the time. Safarov was released
after he had served only six years of a 30 year sentence for reasons
that have yet to be discerned, outraging both Armenians and Hungarians.
"With their joint actions the authorities of Hungary and Azerbaijan
have opened the door for the recurrence of such crimes," Armenia's
then president, Serge Sarkisian, stated prophetically. "With this
decision they send a clear message to the butchers. The slaughterers
hereafter are well aware of the impunity they can enjoy for murder
driven by ethnic or religious hatred."
Safarov returned home to Azerbaijan on a "special flight" and received
a hero's welcome. For his foul murder, the government rewarded him
with a pardon, eight years back pay, an apartment and a promotion of
two ranks, similar to honours Palestinians bestow on their terrorists
for killing Israelis. Also like the Palestinians, one Azeri member
of the national legislature called Safarov "a national hero." Which
shows the level of Azeri hatred and civilizational development when
an axe murderer is accorded this status.
The reason the Obama administration requested on Azerbaijan's
behalf that the two Azeri murderers be released was probably not
a humanitarian one, as it maintains. Like some Arab countries,
Azerbaijan is very oil rich, while Armenia has no oil. American
companies also have investments in the large Azeri oil industry.
Equally important, Azerbaijan serves as a hub for the Caspian
Sea-Central Asian energy pipelines. As well, both Israel and the
United States view Azerbaijan as an ally in the regional showdown with
Iran. So it is most likely that upholding these business and strategic
interests with Azerbaijan was the real reason behind Nuland's pushing
for the terrorists' release.
This situation resembles the controversial early release by Great
Britain of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, a Libyan also known as the Lockerbie
Bomber, who was responsible for 259 deaths when a Pan Am flight was
destroyed by a terrorist bomb over Scotland in 1988. It was later
revealed that the British oil company, British Petroleum, had lobbied
for his release, which greatly helped it obtain a $900 million oil
exploration contract from Muamarr Gaddafi.
But Armenia is not Great Britain. The murder of Lt. Markarian in
Budapest and the two civilians in Artsakh are symbolic of the hatred
and homicidal fate the surrounding Turkic populations have in store
for the Armenian people, much like the Arabs have for Israel. Also
like Israel, Armenians cannot allow the lives of their people to be
sold cheaply. They have already suffered one holocaust. Granting
early release to the two Azeri terrorists would send a wrong, and
very dangerous, message, one that would likely be interpreted as
weakness in one of the world's rougher neighbourhoods where only
strength is respected.
Besides, some Armenians view Nuland's request as hypocritical. Would
the United States, for example, release Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to Russia as
"a humanitarian gesture" to better relations with an Islamic country
or with Putin, they ask? Or free early other imprisoned foreign
terrorists with American blood on their hands?
If the State Department truly wants "to reduce tensions and build
trust" in the region, it should first tell Azerbaijan and Turkey to
lift their blockades and open their borders with Armenia, ending the
crippling of the Armenian economy. This is the humanitarian gesture
it should be pursuing and not the release of two murderers.
The border openings would not only be a good start to solving the
other outstanding regional issues, it would also serve to lessen the
Armenian fear that their Muslim neighbours simply want to finish the
extermination project they started in 1915. It would also constitute
a very fitting gesture of friendship and reconciliation, especially
by Turkey, to Armenians worldwide on the centenary of the horrific
event that serves as the well-spring of so much of their pain.
But instead of a adopting a principled position that would help
lessen that pain, the Obama administration appears to have taken one
of unprincipled pragmatism.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/stephenbrown/obama-administration-insults-memory-of-armenian-holocaust/
Front Page Magazine
March 18 2015
March 18, 2015 by Stephen Brown
Next month, Armenians worldwide will mark the centennial of the
Armenian Holocaust that saw 1.5 million of their people perish
barbarically at the hands of the Ottoman Turks in a jihad that is
continuing today under the Islamic State. This destruction of the
Armenians in Anatolia, where they had lived for several thousand years,
was also the event that gave Hitler reason to believe he could get
away with exterminating Jews, Poles and Gypsies.
"Who still remembers today the annihilation of the Armenians?" the
Nazi leader reportedly said.
The trauma of 1915 left deep scars on the Armenian psyche, similar
to those the Nazi Holocaust made on that of the world's Jews. As
a result, one would think the Obama administration would show an
increased sensitivity regarding the killing of Armenians, especially
by Muslim enemies, and more especially in view of the approaching
Armenian Holocaust's centenary in April. But only last month,
US Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs
Victoria Nuland urged Armenian authorities to make "a humanitarian
gesture" and release two Azeri terrorists who had crossed the border
from Azerbaijan and murdered two people, one a 17-year-old. A third
Armenian, a woman, was badly wounded.
"Such humanitarian gestures have been shown to reduce tensions
and build trust between the sides. So that's what she (Nuland) was
referring to," said a state department spokeswoman later at a press
briefing, in explaining the assistant secretary's controversial
remarks.
Nuland was in Azerbaijan, the second stop of her tour of the Caucuses
Mountains, when she made the "humanitarian gesture" comment, having
previously visited Georgia. In Azerbaijan, Nuland also said she
would take up the matter of releasing the two imprisoned Azeris when
she visited Armenia, her next and last stop. Armenia and Azerbaijan
are both former Soviet republics in the southern Caucuses Mountains,
who now face each other over a closed, hostile border. Armed clashes
occur there now almost daily and deaths have occurred. The military
confrontation between the two Caucasian nations has recently become
so heated, it is feared armed conflict could break out.
The cause of the enmity between Christian Armenia and Azerbaijan, a
Turkic-speaking, Muslim-majority country, was an undeclared war fought
from 1988 to 1994 over Nagorno-Karabakh, an Armenian enclave inside
of Azerbaijan that sought secession and reunification with Armenia in
the dying days of the Soviet empire. The Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians,
perceiving themselves as victims of the Soviet Union's nationalities
policy, believed they were righting a historical wrong. In 1921, the
Bolsheviks had first awarded the enclave to Armenia but later reversed
that decision, giving it to Azerbaijan, even though the population,
according to an early Soviet census, was 95 percent Armenian. Stalin
was reportedly responsible for this fateful, and disastrous, decision
reversal.
During the conflict, both sides engaged in ethnic cleansing. According
to authors Caroline Cox and John Eibner, Azeris cleared 40,000
Armenians out of Kirovabad, Azerbaijan's second-largest city, in 1988
in response to Nagorno-Karabakh's secession drive. Another Azeri pogrom
against Armenians, in which 32 were killed, preceded this in Sumgait,
followed by another in Baku, Azerbaijan's capital.
"The Armenians were not quick to retaliate to the Sumgait massacre,"
wrote Cox and Eibner in their 1993-published book Ethnic Cleansing In
Progress: War In Nagorno-Karabakh. "But Armenian restraint crumbled in
response to the Kirovabad pogrom and the anti-Armenian demonstrations
in Baku."
In the war itself, the outnumbered Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians, with
assistance from neighboring Armenia, not only won their independence,
defeating the Azeri forces, they also conquered some adjoining
Azeri territory, which they still hold today. With the victory,
Nagorno-Karabakh renamed itself Artsakh (its ancient name when
an Armenian kingdom), and became an independent state, recognised
internationally, however, by few others. These diplomatic difficulties
have also prevented Artsakh from joining Armenia, although the two
are closely entwined.
Until now, Artsakh has refused to return the Azeri territory it
occupies until it can be guaranteed that it will not be used to stage
attacks on its land. In this respect, Nagorno-Karabakh has adopted
a position similar to Israel's regarding the Arab territories it
captured in 1967: it will trade land for peace.
Azerbaijan's ally, Turkey, which is located on Armenia's western
border, became so incensed when the Artsakh forces were winning that
it threatened to attack Armenia, although it was not officially a
combatant. Apparently, Turkey is not content with having murdered
1.5 million Armenians a hundred years ago and wants to continue this
homicidal tradition in this century. A Turkish military assault on
Armenia would be like Germany attacking Israel today.
However, a warning from the Kremlin that a Turkish attack on Armenia
would mean war with Russia caused Turkey to climb down, thus averting
a regional conflict. In the end, to save face, all Turkey could do
was seal its border with Armenia as well. This closure has lasted now
22 years, severely disrupting the Armenian economy. And incredibly,
while trying its best to strangle Armenia, Turkey has hypocritically
complained about Israel's blockade of Gaza.
So it is against this background of war, genocide, ethnic cleansing
and ancient hatreds that Nuland called upon Armenian authorities to
make a "humanitarian gesture" and release the murderers. The two
Azeri terrorists were found guilty in a Republic of Artsakh court
after an "open and transparent trial," and received prison sentences
of life and 22 years respectively. One of the charges that formed the
conviction was "murder committed by an organised group motivated by
ethnic hatred." Artsakh security forces killed a third Azeri terrorist
belonging to the group. None of the three, Azerbaijan claims, are
members of its military.
Although Artsakh is recognised by four American state governments,
the most recent being California in 2014, the federal government
continues to deny it diplomatic recognition. As a result, Nuland
did not talk with Artsakh authorities when in Armenia. Instead,
she met with the Armenian foreign minister and visited the Armenian
Holocaust memorial in Yerevan. But Nuland's talks with Armenian
officials concerning the two Azeri terrorists yielded no results.
This was to be expected. Armenians well remember the terrible injustice
and humiliation inflicted on them when the Hungarian government
released early from prison an Azeri military officer, Rami Safarov,
who had killed Armenian officer, Lt. Gurgen Markarian, in his sleep
with an axe in 2004 in Budapest. Both were attending a North Atlantic
Treaty Organization-sponsored event at the time. Safarov was released
after he had served only six years of a 30 year sentence for reasons
that have yet to be discerned, outraging both Armenians and Hungarians.
"With their joint actions the authorities of Hungary and Azerbaijan
have opened the door for the recurrence of such crimes," Armenia's
then president, Serge Sarkisian, stated prophetically. "With this
decision they send a clear message to the butchers. The slaughterers
hereafter are well aware of the impunity they can enjoy for murder
driven by ethnic or religious hatred."
Safarov returned home to Azerbaijan on a "special flight" and received
a hero's welcome. For his foul murder, the government rewarded him
with a pardon, eight years back pay, an apartment and a promotion of
two ranks, similar to honours Palestinians bestow on their terrorists
for killing Israelis. Also like the Palestinians, one Azeri member
of the national legislature called Safarov "a national hero." Which
shows the level of Azeri hatred and civilizational development when
an axe murderer is accorded this status.
The reason the Obama administration requested on Azerbaijan's
behalf that the two Azeri murderers be released was probably not
a humanitarian one, as it maintains. Like some Arab countries,
Azerbaijan is very oil rich, while Armenia has no oil. American
companies also have investments in the large Azeri oil industry.
Equally important, Azerbaijan serves as a hub for the Caspian
Sea-Central Asian energy pipelines. As well, both Israel and the
United States view Azerbaijan as an ally in the regional showdown with
Iran. So it is most likely that upholding these business and strategic
interests with Azerbaijan was the real reason behind Nuland's pushing
for the terrorists' release.
This situation resembles the controversial early release by Great
Britain of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, a Libyan also known as the Lockerbie
Bomber, who was responsible for 259 deaths when a Pan Am flight was
destroyed by a terrorist bomb over Scotland in 1988. It was later
revealed that the British oil company, British Petroleum, had lobbied
for his release, which greatly helped it obtain a $900 million oil
exploration contract from Muamarr Gaddafi.
But Armenia is not Great Britain. The murder of Lt. Markarian in
Budapest and the two civilians in Artsakh are symbolic of the hatred
and homicidal fate the surrounding Turkic populations have in store
for the Armenian people, much like the Arabs have for Israel. Also
like Israel, Armenians cannot allow the lives of their people to be
sold cheaply. They have already suffered one holocaust. Granting
early release to the two Azeri terrorists would send a wrong, and
very dangerous, message, one that would likely be interpreted as
weakness in one of the world's rougher neighbourhoods where only
strength is respected.
Besides, some Armenians view Nuland's request as hypocritical. Would
the United States, for example, release Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to Russia as
"a humanitarian gesture" to better relations with an Islamic country
or with Putin, they ask? Or free early other imprisoned foreign
terrorists with American blood on their hands?
If the State Department truly wants "to reduce tensions and build
trust" in the region, it should first tell Azerbaijan and Turkey to
lift their blockades and open their borders with Armenia, ending the
crippling of the Armenian economy. This is the humanitarian gesture
it should be pursuing and not the release of two murderers.
The border openings would not only be a good start to solving the
other outstanding regional issues, it would also serve to lessen the
Armenian fear that their Muslim neighbours simply want to finish the
extermination project they started in 1915. It would also constitute
a very fitting gesture of friendship and reconciliation, especially
by Turkey, to Armenians worldwide on the centenary of the horrific
event that serves as the well-spring of so much of their pain.
But instead of a adopting a principled position that would help
lessen that pain, the Obama administration appears to have taken one
of unprincipled pragmatism.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/stephenbrown/obama-administration-insults-memory-of-armenian-holocaust/