Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Transcript: The Charlie Rose Show: Conversation With Geoffrey Robert

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Transcript: The Charlie Rose Show: Conversation With Geoffrey Robert

    TRANSCRIPT: THE CHARLIE ROSE SHOW: CONVERSATION WITH GEOFFREY ROBERTSON

    The Charlie Rose Show
    March 16, 2015 Monday
    SHOW: THE CHARLIE ROSE SHOW 11:00 PM EST

    Conversation with Geoffrey Robertson

    Charlie Rose, Ethan Bronner, Gayle King
    GUESTS: Geoffrey Robertson

    HIGHLIGHT: Geoffrey Robertson is a distinguished British barrister,
    he`s argued many landmark cases in human rights as well as criminal
    and media law; he`s currently part of the legal team representing
    Armenia at the European Court of Human Rights, the case will
    determine whether denying the genocide of Armenians under Ottoman
    rule is a criminal offense rule in Switzerland, this year marks the
    centennial of the mass killings during World War I. Vijay Iyer is a
    jazz pianist, a composer, he`s also a professor of music at Harvard,
    in February he released an album with his trio called "Break Stuff";
    "The Guardian" calls it a dizzying pinnacle of contemporary jazz
    multitasking. Arlene Alda is a photographer and author, her latest
    book is called "Just Kids from the Bronx: Telling It the Way It Was";
    Alan Alda is an award wing actor known for his roles in the television
    series like MASH, "The West Wing" and most recently "The Blacklist",
    in recent years, he`s become a visiting professor at the Alan Alda
    Center for Communicating Science at Stony Brook University.

    CHARLIE ROSE, PBS HOST: Welcome to the program.

    Tonight Geoffrey Robertson. His new book is "An Inconvenient Genocide:
    Who Now Remembers the Armenians?" Sitting in for me is Ethan Bronner,
    managing editor of Bloomberg News.

    (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON, AUTHOR, "AN INCONVENIENT GENOCIDE": The reason we
    were on the Anzac Beaches on Gallipoli and my great uncle was shot by
    a Turkish sniper. I don`t remember him much because he volunteered to
    fight. The Turkish sniper was lawfully defending his own position. But
    it`s different with victims of an international crime.

    That`s why I think this is not a tragedy as genocide deniers call it.

    It was a crime, a crime of genocide as we now call it. Then it was
    called a crime against humanity because they are victims of crime
    and it`s been unrequited.

    I think today there are 2,000 churches in Turkey that have been
    expropriated by the Ottomans. They should be restored.

    (END VIDEO CLIP)

    CHARLIE ROSE: We continue this evening with Vijay Iyer, the musician.

    His new album is called "Break Stuff". Sitting in for me is Gayle
    King of CBS News.

    (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

    VIJAY IYER, MUSICIAN: It`s a form of address, you know. I`m actually
    reaching out to the listener to say you can be a part of this. And
    that`s what music is, it`s about creating a bond or link with others.

    That`s what it does for me.

    (END VIDEO CLIP)

    CHARLIE ROSE: We conclude this evening with Alan and Arlene Alda. Her
    book is called "Just Kids from the Bronx: Telling it the way it was".

    Sitting in for me is me.

    (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

    CHARLIE ROSE: Mary Higgins Clark.

    ARLENE ALDA, AUTHOR: Great --

    ALAN ALDA, ACTOR: It`s a wonderful thing -- Mary Higgins Clark said.

    ARLENE ALDA: I love what Mary Higgins Clark said. The Bronx, she said,
    people just don`t get it. There are three places in the world that
    have a "the" in front of their names -- The Vatican, The Hague and
    The Bronx.

    (END VIDEO CLIP)

    CHARLIE ROSE: Geoffrey Robertson, Vijay Iyer, Arlene Alda and Alan
    Alda when we continue.

    ANNOUNCER: From our studios in New York City, this is Charlie Rose.

    (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

    ETHAN BRONNER, BLOOMBERG NEWS: Good evening, I`m Ethan Bronner. I`m
    a managing editor at Bloomberg News. I`m filling in for Charlie Rose
    who is on assignment.

    Joining me now is Geoffrey Robertson, a distinguished British
    barrister. He`s argued many landmark cases in human rights as well
    as criminal and media law. He`s currently part of the legal team
    representing Armenia at the European Court of Human Rights. The case
    will determine whether denying the genocide of Armenians under Ottoman
    rule is a criminal offense rule in Switzerland. This year marks the
    centennial of the mass killings during World War I. Robertson is also
    the author of the book "An Inconvenient Genocide: Who Now remembers
    the Armenians".

    I`m pleased to have him here. Welcome.

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: Hi -- Ethan.

    ETHAN BRONNER: So, you know what -- the topic, I want to divide it
    into at least two parts. One is what happened and the other is how
    we talk about it and why it matters. So why don`t we start with what
    happened nearly 100 years ago.

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: Sure. In 1915, April 24, the Istanbul authorities,
    Constantinople it was called then, rounded up the Armenian
    intellectuals, the community leaders, took them off and killed them
    and that was the beginning of a genocide which took over half the
    Armenian race. The Turks now say we only killed about 800,000 but
    probably over one million were killed. More than half the Armenian
    people were rounded up.

    They were -- the men were generally shot if they were over 12. The
    women, the children and old men were put on 400, 500 mile marches
    across the desert -- the places that we only know now because they`re
    occupied by ISIS -- and they died. They died of typhus, they died of
    dysentery. They were attacked, they were raped. The women were taken
    off very often as converts and their property was expropriated. They
    were forced to march, the laws there and then the abandoned property
    laws because they weren`t coming back. This was genocide as we now
    know it.

    ETHAN BRONNER: OK. So it was a term that didn`t exist until the 1930s.

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: It didn`t. It was invented a brilliant Polish
    Jewish lawyer called Raphael Lemkin. And he was obsessed with what
    happened to the Armenians -- the massacres, the ethnic cleansing --

    ETHAN BRONNER: Because he was a Polish Jew in the 1930s.

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: Sure.

    ETHAN BRONNER: Did he sense something would happen?

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: Well, he started -- in 1922 there was something
    called Operation Nemesis that got the main perpetrator -- the guy who
    was the Hitler, the Ottoman Hitler was shot, assassinated in Berlin
    and put on trial. The assassin was acquitted after the jury heard
    of the horror that he had gone through with his family being killed,
    watching his mother being raped and so forth. And the evidence came
    from the Lutheran missionaries, it came from German generals who had
    been there horrified at what the Ottoman Turks were doing.

    And Lemkin thought this is wrong. This is justice as the Armenians
    saw it, Nemesis but this is no way for the world to go. We need a
    law that can overleap the national sovereignty boundaries and say,
    no matter how much you are ordered by your government to kill, a
    particular race or a particular religion, there is an international
    law that will eventually put you on trial.

    ETHAN BRONNER: If a nation killed its own, there was no legal framework
    to try it.

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: Not until Nuremberg.

    ETHAN BRONNER: Right.

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: Nuremberg was the beginning of international
    criminal law. I mean the British, when they won in 1918, took 68 of
    the main perpetrators to Malta to put them on trial and realized they
    couldn`t try them because there was this (INAUDIBLE) sovereignty idea
    that no prince or head of state can be held liable for killing his
    own people.

    ETHAN BRONNER: So we have this irony which is this man invents this
    term to apply to this event --

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: Exactly.

    ETHAN BRONNER: -- and now the whole debate is whether this term
    applies to this event.

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: That`s right. And we had a genocide convention
    in 1948, and Raphael Lemkin the author of it was inspired as I say by
    the Armenian genocide. But now Turkey is neuralgic about the genocide
    and makes certain sorts of threats.

    ETHAN BRONNER: There is this question of freedom of speech and
    expression in Europe versus the United States --

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: Sure.

    ETHAN BRONNER: -- the fact that in these countries like in Switzerland
    it`s illegal to deny genocide of Armenians or the Holocaust.

    So let`s start with the Turks` view. Why are they so horrified by
    this term?

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: The g-word sends shivers down state spines
    because it`s against international law. There`s a possibility of
    compensation if you commit genocide. Ronald Reagan ratified the
    genocide convention. Let`s remember, America doesn`t ratify many
    international laws beyond this one. America was a bit nervous in
    Rwanda, remember how America and Britain lied in the Security Council
    to pretend that it wasn`t genocide when it was because they fear
    they`d have to do something about it.

    So Turkey has come up with this idea that it was military necessity
    to deport all the Armenians.

    ETHAN BRONNER: Well, at least they have asserted and others have
    that it was in the middle of a war and it was complicated. People
    died but it wasn`t the same thing as (INAUDIBLE) in World War II.

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: They say it was military necessity to get rid of
    a possible fifth column. But, you know, deporting women and children
    and old men across the desert as they die isn`t necessary for any
    military. If you`ve got anyone who is a possible traitor, you can
    intern them, you can detain them, you can prosecute them but that`s
    not what they were doing.

    ETHAN BRONNER: But do you think Geoffrey that standards have changed?

    In other words that because we live in a post Holocaust world today
    we have much greater sensitivity toward what happened not that under
    any circumstances by anyone`s description what happened was OK. But
    the question is whether it was so unusual compared with today.

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: I think Lemkin`s genius was to identify racial
    and religious passion as particularly igniting. The Armenian genocide
    is important to study. There was a Turkification campaign. There are
    all sorts of nationalism. There was the changing of Christian names
    to Muslim names and so forth.

    And this is a pattern that we can see recurring in Bangladesh, in
    Guatemala, with the Mayans (ph), with Rwanda and the Tutsis, the
    gypsies. I could go on -- Indonesia in the 60s, the killing of the
    Chinese and so on.

    ETHAN BRONNER: In the Armenian case the fact that they were Christian,
    do you think that was a very important --

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: Oh, a lot of them were killed --

    ETHAN BRONNER: Precisely for their --

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: -- to the Allah Akbar and the young Turkish
    government had attained imam whom got they got to pronounce a fatwa
    on Christians and so they realized they had to reach to the Germans,
    because Germans were their allies.

    ETHAN BRONNER: OK. So this happened. Now what does it mean for the
    Turks to acknowledge and others when we say that compensation could
    occur? Who makes that decision?

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: Well, it`s possibly a legal decision and it --

    ETHAN BRONNER: Where?

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: -- in Europe. The European Court of Human Rights
    has already ordered Turkey to compensate those Greek Cypriots that
    it threw out of Northern Cyprus. That was 50 years ago. There are
    still living memories. I mean President Obama, a couple of years ago,
    had tea with a genocide survivor who was 103. The world`s most famous
    Armenian who is, of course, Kim Kardashian.

    But that is -- it`s still for children, for grandchildren. These people
    live it. And you know, I`m an Australian actually and we were --
    the reason we were on Anzac beaches on Gallipoli and my great uncle
    was shot by a Turkish sniper. I don`t remember him much because he
    volunteered to fight. The Turkish sniper was lawfully defending his
    own position but it`s different with victims of an international crime.

    That`s why I think this is not a tragedy as genocide deniers call it.

    It was a crime -- the crime of genocide as we now call it. Then it
    was called a crime against humanity. And because they are victims
    of crime and it`s been unrequited. I think today there are 2,000
    churches in Turkey that had been expropriated by the Ottomans. They
    should restored.

    ETHAN BRONNER: So on the one hand we have the Turks, of course, and
    they`re the ones being accused having done this. So they say no that`s
    not what happened. And that`s an issue you need to deal with. But
    there`s a geo-political issue which is the United States government
    the British government have not in fact been willing to insist this
    is what happened because of their relationship with Turkey. Why?

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: Because Turkey is more important. I mean President
    Obama when he went campaigning in 2008 said I`m a lawyer. I know
    it was genocide and I`m going to say it was when I`m president. He
    doesn`t ever use the g-word. He uses Medz Yeghern which no one
    understands. It`s Armenian for the great catastrophe.

    Britain which was most active in denouncing these atrocities in 1915
    suddenly when Turkey became important started saying the evidence
    is not sufficiently unequivocal which was a beautiful British
    Mandarin-crafted deceitful phrase. And I did a Freedom of Information
    Act search and I found the memorandum explaining to ministers why
    this formula had to be used.

    And it actually said Turkey is neuralgic -- good word -- on this
    subject. Our position is unethical but the strategic commercial
    realities mean there`s no other option. Turkey just goes crazy and
    we need Turkey. NATO needs Turkey at the time. It`s their bases and
    its spy bases are being used.

    ETHAN BRONNER: Can you imagine -- I mean just to question this --
    can you imagine a need great enough to say that well maybe this is
    not so important to use the g-word?

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: Well, I think that President Erdogan is faced with
    a problem -- a lot of problems with his dispute with Armenia. Now he
    doesn`t understand genocide. He says it couldn`t have been because
    there are still Armenians living in Turkey.

    ETHAN BRONNER: I see.

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: People just don`t understand that genocide means
    wiping out (AUDIO GAP) race as they did Srebrenica. That was genocide.

    You don`t have to find an order. There was no order to kill the Jews.

    What is fascinating is to look at the language that was used by
    the Turks and the language that was used by Adolf Eichmann in his
    Vanze (ph) memorandum. They weren`t deporting, they were relocating
    or evacuating the Jews but that was based on the language that the
    Ottomans used of the Armenians. They didn`t -- their laws of abandoned
    property. Property wasn`t abandoned, they were forced out.

    ETHAN BRONNER: Of course. No, I understand. These are all --

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: The same euphemisms, the genocide euphemisms are
    very much the same.

    ETHAN BRONNER: So let`s assume for the next literature that you write
    that this unquestionably was genocide and in fact there`s a lot of
    reason to think that. The next question is why should it be against
    the law to deny it? We are not used to that in the United States.

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: No, of course you`re not. But you`ve never
    been occupied by the Nazis. You never had part of your population
    extinguished. In Europe, it`s a different matter. The French, the
    Belgians were occupied. The Germans and Austrians did doing the
    occupying and I mean that is why we have this peculiar European idea
    where it can be wrong and against the law for people to deny the
    existence of gas chambers and so forth. If you deny one genocide and
    that`s against the law, why not if you deny another genocide should
    that not be against the law?

    So it was a difficult case for when this crazy nationalist Turk
    who loves challenging genocide denial laws he goes throughout Europe
    saying the Armenian genocide is a lie and oops to be convicted. And for
    Amal Clooney and I who are brought up more in the American tradition,
    which is still alive in Britain, where you draw the line is against
    the guy who shouts fire in a crowded theatre.

    So we argued as a basis for a sort of European-wide law that you should
    only prosecute genocide deniers where they do real harm. Where there
    is -- their intention is to vilify minority community. So that was
    the distinction the court --

    ETHAN BRONNER: And that what you`re -- that`s why you`re taking this
    case against them.

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: Well, we are not taking the case. We are -- our
    position on behalf of the Armenian government was to simply set a
    standard. To say this is the standard and you apply it to the facts
    of this case one way or the other. But the reason we had intervened
    was that the first court decision was incredibly silly. It said well,
    there may not have been an Armenian genocide because there were no
    gas chambers. It wasn`t as well proven as the Holocaust.

    But of course, there are photographs. There are laws, there`s the
    deportation law, the abandoned property law. It is just as well.

    ETHAN BRONNER: More about the Turks also because under Erdogan, there
    has been a kind of liberalizing attitude towards -- attitudes toward
    minorities, the Kurds and the Armenians.

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: Yes.

    ETHAN BRONNER: He did sort of say a terrible thing happened by he
    hasn`t apologized for it and he hasn`t called it genocide. Is that
    right? And is it still --

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: What he hasn`t said and this confounds every
    genocide denier. You say to them all right if it wasn`t genocide it was
    a crime against humanity. And they`ve got no answer because undoubtedly
    it was and genocide is one genus of a crime against humanity.

    ETHAN BRONNER: Turkey has not used that phrase either.

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: I think what will, and Turkey`s entry to the
    European Union may depend on this, if Erdogan can bring himself at
    least to acknowledge that it was a crime against humanity, to give
    back some of the churches and allow them to be used as Christian
    churches. And maybe make some symbolic gesture -- I suggested Mount
    Ararat which, of course, is the great mystical mountain, Noah`s
    ark and so forth. And it would be -- it overshadows Yerevan which
    is the Armenian capital and that would be a wonderful gesture of
    reconciliation.

    ETHAN BRONNER: And you`re saying that because you`re not saying --
    you`re not calling for compensation yourself.

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: Well, I think there should be compensation for
    those who can trace their property which was expropriated. Yes, if
    you can trace it and some can, there`s already been some action over
    insurance policies. And this would be --

    ETHAN BRONNER: Tell me how active have the Turks been in trying to
    deny this as they`ve been on an actual campaign?

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: I think there`s been billions on it. I think
    they`ve hired Dick Gephardt to -- before he was a lobbyist was a
    congressman who was actually quite vocal in saying it was an Armenian
    genocide. Now he`s being paid to set up propaganda exercise to say
    that it wasn`t.

    So as the centenary approaches on April 24th, there has been, there`s
    actually the government is holding a diversification event. They are
    trying to distract attention --

    ETHAN BRONNER: Who`s having that --

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: -- the Turkish government by having an
    international celebration or commemoration of Gallipoli and they`re
    getting the British, the Australian prime ministers, the New Zealand
    prime minister where Gallipoli is sort of sacred. Even the young
    Prince Charles I think is going and the young princess --

    ETHAN BRONNER: But there are human rights groups that are setting
    up some commemoration not just in Yerevan but also in Istanbul as I
    understand it.

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: Yes, I think they --

    ETHAN BRONNER: And they`re not getting in the way are they?

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: No. I think there are human rights groups very
    much focusing on the death of Hrant Dink. And of course there are
    a lot of liberal Turks and they`re getting more courageous at Hrant
    Dink`s funeral. A lot of young Turkish people held up banners saying
    "We are all Armenians".

    ETHAN BRONNER: And are there things that you`d recommend for people
    to do to affect attitudes inside Turkey?

    G: Well, I think that it is a matter for the Turkish leadership to
    start explaining. Of course, you go back to the school textbooks
    and to what kids are taught. At the moment they`re taught all the
    arguments for refuting genocide. They are giving prizes for writing
    essays that explains it wasn`t genocide. I think that`s got to stop.

    And there has to be an element of truth telling.

    Because even Ataturk apologized and described this as a shameful act
    and I think that kind of information has to be allowed into Turkish
    textbooks.

    ETHAN BRONNER: Geoffrey Robertson, thank you very much. Thanks for
    joining us.

    GEOFFREY ROBERTSON: Thank you.

Working...
X