Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Archbishop Mutafian And Cohorts Distraught

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Archbishop Mutafian And Cohorts Distraught

    ARCHBISHOP MUTAFIAN AND COHORTS DISTRAUGHT

    Azg/arm
    18 March 05

    When certain traditional values are trampled and hierarchical order is
    under assault, it is symptomatic that the fabric of a given society
    has a breakdown. Unfortunately, a young clergyman on the historical
    throne of the Armenian Patriarchate in Istanbul has signaled this
    deterioration, which threatens to infect the Diaspora with the help
    and collusion of some cohorts.

    For a long time the Diaspora Armenians had been watching the
    activities of Archbishop Mutafian with deep concern, because those
    activities were, at best, characterized with eccentricity. Yet as long
    as he had confined his activities to his flock, no one would dare to
    criticize the young clergyman, especially in view of the intellectual
    elite still active in the community and a leadership cherishing
    traditional values and watching unorthodox tendencies to be checked.

    Diaspora is particularly cognizant of the conditions that Turkish
    authorities have created to suffocate and disrupt Armenian community
    life in Turkey.

    For that reason we always considered that meddling in the affairs of
    Istanbul Armenian community life from abroad would hamper an already
    difficult mission of the leadership in that community.

    All these considerations intended to help that leadership to perform
    its function in daunting circumstances.

    Archbishop Mutafian disregarded all those sensitive relations and all
    of a sudden decided to export his eccentricities to other communities
    with unchecked imperial ambitions. As if the Armenian Church did not
    have enough problems with the division initiated by Antelias,
    Archbishop Mutafian came out with his own brand of division, trying to
    undermine the authority of his Holiness Catholicos Karekin II, supreme
    spiritual leader of the Armenian Apostolic Church. Without getting
    into details, it suffices to mention his solidarity with the former
    Primate of Moscow who had rebelled against the Catholicos. Fortunately
    the former Primate, Ghazaros Gureghian, was defrocked and the legal
    challenge was resolved in favor of Holy Etchmiadzin.

    That eliminated one of Archbishop Mutafian's allies in the church. But
    he would not rest nor respect the hierarchy of the Armenian Church. He
    seized another opportunity to vent his revolt against Etchmiadzin,
    when the Catholicos awarded an Istanbul Armenian couple with a medal
    for their contribution to the Church. Archbishop Mutafian
    disgracefully returned Vehapar's encyclical requesting a "correction";
    that irrational gesture had two main intentions: a) to demonstrate his
    disrespect to the spiritual head of the church, b) to request that a
    specific clause be added to the encyclical indicating that the
    benefactors were being awarded only for their contributions to
    Armenia. That, of course, intended to raise a red flag for Turkish
    authorities that Armenians in Istanbul were earning the money in
    Turkey and investing it in Armenia, knowing full well the
    interpretation of this transaction in Turkish conspiratorial mind.

    Certainly, the same disrespectful mentality had prompted Archbishop
    Mutafian to sue the AGBU, knowing full well that the AGBU leadership
    is very supportive of Mother See at Etchmiadzin.

    It is Archbishop Mutafian's last worry to see an Armenian school (i.e.
    Melkonian) closed down in the Diaspora, when he has been complaining
    about his own turf, the Turkish-Armenian community, for having too
    many schools.

    The "Opinion Piece" of the ADL, which also appeared on the editorial
    page of the Mirror-Spectator, intended to criticize the archbishop for
    suing a century-old venerable organization, and not necessarily
    discuss the closure of Melkonian Educational Institution.

    It looks like our criticism has also irritated some of the
    archbishop's cohorts. It would have been a shame to keep silent in
    front of a disgraceful act. Archbishop Mutafian has issued a rebuttal
    on March 5, 2005, under the signature of Istanbul Armenian
    Patriarchate.

    The official opinion of any organization reflects the collective
    thinking of its leadership. Here again, in the rebuttal, Archbishop
    Mutafian singles out the name of one of the ADL chairmen to point out
    to the Turkish authorities who their true enemy is.

    Although his Beatitude claims that he does not wish to dignify our
    criticism with an answer, he answers anyway, by contradicting himself
    and characterizes the ADL ideology as "bankrupt". The ADL ideology is
    based on the belief in the democratic system, on the recognition of
    the Armenian Genocide and the liberation of historic Armenian
    homeland. These ideals can only be considered "bankrupt" for people
    living under the fearful Turkish military rule.

    The good Archbishop has found an ardent defender in Ms. Arpi Totoyan
    of Paris, who has even pre-empted him by signing an article in the
    daily Haratch, issue of March 4. This young writer, who cherishes
    tutoring manners to everybody in the Armenian life - sometimes
    overtopping her bounds - needs to learn one important thing: to
    understand correctly the texts that she reads.

    Indeed, she claims to have found a mistake in our statement that Sourp
    Khach Seminary does not exist. And she insists that Sourp Khach exists
    as a high school educating many generations for a half a century. For
    all practical purposes, it does not exist, because it was founded to
    educate clergy, but the Turkish authorities banned its mission,
    allowing it to exist as a secondary school. It does not take a rocket
    scientist to understand the true issue in this case.

    In her fiery defense, Ms. Totoyan states that Archbishop Mesrob does
    not need any defense (but she does anyway) and deviating from the main
    issue, states that similar opinion pieces cannot absolve the AGBU from
    closing the Melkonian, while our point was to take issue with his
    Beatitude for suing an Armenian organization and not necessarily
    debate the closure of Melkonian, which was already debated ad nauseam
    in our press.

    Should this lawsuit continue, a fair verdict would be rendered,
    because the US courts don't operate like Turkish courts. Yet whatever
    the verdict, there will be no winners in this case. We will all be
    embarrassed as Armenians, especially in this year when we plan to
    commemorate the 90th anniversary of the Genocide.

    We may not rule out the possibility that the main motive behind this
    lawsuit was to dampen the impact of the commemoration. The onus of
    this deplorable campaign rests on Archbishop Mutafian and his cohorts
    for this uncalled for provocation.

    The outcome will only please the Turks, who may already be watching
    with great amusement.

    Office of the ADL Central Press Committee
Working...
X