Tweet
TURKEY MISTREATS MINORITIES; DOES NOT MERIT EU MEMBERSHIP
by Kyle Szarzynski
UW Badger Herald, WI
Nov 29 2006
The pope's recent visit to Turkey and his call for the nation's
acceptance into the European Union has added an interesting element
to the debate about Turkey's inclusion into the EU. It is now more
difficult to pitch the issue as one between the West and the Middle
East, or Christianity and Islam, because the most Christian and
Western of institutions - the Roman Catholic Church - has embraced
the notion of Turkish membership in the ever-more powerful EU.
And yet this approach, as good intentioned as it may be, misses a
crucial component of the issue: Turkey's non-Christian and non-Western
essence equates to fundamentally non-European values and is thus
not suitable for EU membership. This differing system of values has
concrete political and cultural implications, making it inapt for
Turkey and European states to exist under the umbrella of the same
supranational political and economic organization.
The Europe of 2006 is by no means a perfect society, as it is plagued
by, among other things, unemployment, racism and the steady erosion
of the welfare state. Still, the European ideals of community-based
politics, a social safety net, universal education and cooperation
have made the continent the world leader of progress. The relative
equality and justice of European society are the envy of countries
all over the world, including the United States (the 35-hour work
week, for example, is something that American workers can only dream
about). The state of Europe today goes hand-in-hand with its seemingly
paradoxical Christian foundation (including the emphasis on human
solidarity and equality) and a strong commitment to secular humanism.
This makes quite a contrast to Turkey. Despite the country's reputation
as a liberal, Muslim state, its acceptance into the EU would still
stand out like an ink blot on the organization's map. One notable
difference between Turkey and the rest of Europe is the power of the
military, which has staged four coups since 1960. In recent years,
the armed forces has succumbed to EU pressure and limited its meddling
in political affairs. However, this has been only a mixed blessing,
as the secular military serves as the only bulwark against the growing
power of the Islamic fundamentalists, whose representation in the
country's legislature has, alarmingly, been steadily increasing. The
reality is that many secular progressives in Turkey actually see the
military as a lesser evil to the threat of Islamic extremists. This
pessimistic political dynamic amounts to a lose-lose situation for
those who believe that Turkish political practices can be reconciled
with those of Europe's.
Turkey's suppression of human rights is yet another problem. Its abuse
of the Kurdish minority has caused worldwide condemnation. In the
struggle against separatist rebels, like the Kurdistan Workers Party,
it is estimated that more than 30,000 people have been killed since
the 1980s. The brutality of the military's treatment of the Kurds
has manifested itself in the use of poison gas and mass bombings
of villages.
Free speech is also lacking. While Europe has arguably gone to one
extreme in criminalizing the act of denying the Holocaust, Turkey
has made it a crime to even acknowledge its own history of genocide
against the Armenians. The Nobel Prize-winning novelist, Orhan Pamuk,
was brought up on charges of "insulting Turkishness" after he remarked
that, "Thirty thousand Kurds and a million Armenians were killed in
these lands, and nobody dares to talk about it."
International outrage ensued, and the charges were later dropped.
The relative backwardness of Turkish political institutions is only
one deterrent to EU membership. The cultural attitudes of the people,
which are at least partially responsible for the existence of such
institutions, are another. The anti-European attitudes of the Turkish
people were recently exemplified in a poll conducted by the Milliyet
newspaper Oct. 24, which showed that two-thirds of the Turkish people
don't even want to join the EU. Government prosecution of Christian
converts and recent plans to construct female-only parks have,
similarly, been greeted with support by most Turks.
Such sentiment is the product of a country that has lived under
military rule for decades and continues to be held back by reactionary
religious ideas. It is all too clear that Turkish institutions and
Turkish ideas are clearly not European ones. Once this is realized,
the foolishness of admitting a non-European nation into the European
Union becomes all too obvious.
Kyle Szarzynski ([email protected]) is a sophomore majoring in
Spanish and history.
http://badgerherald.com/oped/2006/11/29/ turkey_mistreats_min.php
by Kyle Szarzynski
UW Badger Herald, WI
Nov 29 2006
The pope's recent visit to Turkey and his call for the nation's
acceptance into the European Union has added an interesting element
to the debate about Turkey's inclusion into the EU. It is now more
difficult to pitch the issue as one between the West and the Middle
East, or Christianity and Islam, because the most Christian and
Western of institutions - the Roman Catholic Church - has embraced
the notion of Turkish membership in the ever-more powerful EU.
And yet this approach, as good intentioned as it may be, misses a
crucial component of the issue: Turkey's non-Christian and non-Western
essence equates to fundamentally non-European values and is thus
not suitable for EU membership. This differing system of values has
concrete political and cultural implications, making it inapt for
Turkey and European states to exist under the umbrella of the same
supranational political and economic organization.
The Europe of 2006 is by no means a perfect society, as it is plagued
by, among other things, unemployment, racism and the steady erosion
of the welfare state. Still, the European ideals of community-based
politics, a social safety net, universal education and cooperation
have made the continent the world leader of progress. The relative
equality and justice of European society are the envy of countries
all over the world, including the United States (the 35-hour work
week, for example, is something that American workers can only dream
about). The state of Europe today goes hand-in-hand with its seemingly
paradoxical Christian foundation (including the emphasis on human
solidarity and equality) and a strong commitment to secular humanism.
This makes quite a contrast to Turkey. Despite the country's reputation
as a liberal, Muslim state, its acceptance into the EU would still
stand out like an ink blot on the organization's map. One notable
difference between Turkey and the rest of Europe is the power of the
military, which has staged four coups since 1960. In recent years,
the armed forces has succumbed to EU pressure and limited its meddling
in political affairs. However, this has been only a mixed blessing,
as the secular military serves as the only bulwark against the growing
power of the Islamic fundamentalists, whose representation in the
country's legislature has, alarmingly, been steadily increasing. The
reality is that many secular progressives in Turkey actually see the
military as a lesser evil to the threat of Islamic extremists. This
pessimistic political dynamic amounts to a lose-lose situation for
those who believe that Turkish political practices can be reconciled
with those of Europe's.
Turkey's suppression of human rights is yet another problem. Its abuse
of the Kurdish minority has caused worldwide condemnation. In the
struggle against separatist rebels, like the Kurdistan Workers Party,
it is estimated that more than 30,000 people have been killed since
the 1980s. The brutality of the military's treatment of the Kurds
has manifested itself in the use of poison gas and mass bombings
of villages.
Free speech is also lacking. While Europe has arguably gone to one
extreme in criminalizing the act of denying the Holocaust, Turkey
has made it a crime to even acknowledge its own history of genocide
against the Armenians. The Nobel Prize-winning novelist, Orhan Pamuk,
was brought up on charges of "insulting Turkishness" after he remarked
that, "Thirty thousand Kurds and a million Armenians were killed in
these lands, and nobody dares to talk about it."
International outrage ensued, and the charges were later dropped.
The relative backwardness of Turkish political institutions is only
one deterrent to EU membership. The cultural attitudes of the people,
which are at least partially responsible for the existence of such
institutions, are another. The anti-European attitudes of the Turkish
people were recently exemplified in a poll conducted by the Milliyet
newspaper Oct. 24, which showed that two-thirds of the Turkish people
don't even want to join the EU. Government prosecution of Christian
converts and recent plans to construct female-only parks have,
similarly, been greeted with support by most Turks.
Such sentiment is the product of a country that has lived under
military rule for decades and continues to be held back by reactionary
religious ideas. It is all too clear that Turkish institutions and
Turkish ideas are clearly not European ones. Once this is realized,
the foolishness of admitting a non-European nation into the European
Union becomes all too obvious.
Kyle Szarzynski ([email protected]) is a sophomore majoring in
Spanish and history.
http://badgerherald.com/oped/2006/11/29/ turkey_mistreats_min.php