TURKISH DAILY NEWS: SARGSYAN-GUL POSSIBLE MEETING WILL BE A THAW IN BILATERAL RELATIONS
PanARMENIAN.Net
05.08.2008 15:58 GMT+04:00
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Associate professor Kamer Kasim, a writer at the
International Strategic Research Center, or USAK, said Armenia must be
willing to change its attitude on three key matters currently harming
Turkey-Armenian relations for the football diplomacy to achieve any
meaningful results. "The first is a deletion of the expression "Western
Armenia" from its declaration of independence, and a signature of an
agreement on good neighborliness and the inviolability of borders,"
Kasim said, the Turkish Daily News reports.
Kacim continued, saying, "Second is progress in the Nagorno Karabakh
case, and third is dropping charges of genocide against Turkey."
Armenia's declaration of independence adopted in 1990 says that the
republic stands for international recognition of the Armenian Genocide
at the hands of the Ottoman Empire.
Turkey severed diplomatic ties with Armenia as a token of solidarity
with Azerbaijan in the Nagorno-Karabakh issue.
An alternative to an all-or-nothing approach to the expected fresh
diplomatic initiative would be to focus on soft topics shadowed by
hard politics. "I do not expect great things from an eventual meeting,
but it is evident that there will be a thaw in bilateral relations,"
Fuat Keyman, a professor of International Relations at Koc University
commented.
Keyman noted that Turkey must take the lead in softening relations
and stop pushing Armenia into a corner. "I believe that Turkey is
an important player in the Caucasus, Balkans and the Middle East. As
Turkey has more influence, Armenia is more and more isolated," he said,
making reference to three important projects that connect Georgia,
Azerbaijan and Turkey and bypass Armenia - the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
oil pipeline inaugurated in 2005, the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum natural gas
line opened end 2006 and the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway, construction
of which started this year. "Moreover, as Turkey's negotiation process
with the European Union advances, economic and cultural relations
will improve with Armenia," Keyman asserted.
There are internal difficulties that seem to narrow the scope of
bilateral dialogue, Kasim argued. The status of Nagorno Karabakh is
unlikely to benefit from whatever diplomatic thaw Turkey and Armenia
seek to achieve in the short term, both experts agreed. "Sargsyan is
of Karabakh origin, so are his supporters," noted Kasim, pointing to
difficulties the Armenian president might face even if he is willing to
adopt a policy change. "Even if the president is willing for progress,
it will be negotiated behind the scenes and made public at the last
minute," Kasim said.
Another point is the Armenian position, which holds that Armenia
is ready to talk without any preconditions. "This is propaganda by
Armenian because it is Turkey that brings conditions," Kasim said,
pointing out that no concrete policy changes have yet been proposed
by Yerevan.
It is unclear whether or not President Abdullah Gul will fly to
Yerevan for the match on Sept. 6.
PanARMENIAN.Net
05.08.2008 15:58 GMT+04:00
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Associate professor Kamer Kasim, a writer at the
International Strategic Research Center, or USAK, said Armenia must be
willing to change its attitude on three key matters currently harming
Turkey-Armenian relations for the football diplomacy to achieve any
meaningful results. "The first is a deletion of the expression "Western
Armenia" from its declaration of independence, and a signature of an
agreement on good neighborliness and the inviolability of borders,"
Kasim said, the Turkish Daily News reports.
Kacim continued, saying, "Second is progress in the Nagorno Karabakh
case, and third is dropping charges of genocide against Turkey."
Armenia's declaration of independence adopted in 1990 says that the
republic stands for international recognition of the Armenian Genocide
at the hands of the Ottoman Empire.
Turkey severed diplomatic ties with Armenia as a token of solidarity
with Azerbaijan in the Nagorno-Karabakh issue.
An alternative to an all-or-nothing approach to the expected fresh
diplomatic initiative would be to focus on soft topics shadowed by
hard politics. "I do not expect great things from an eventual meeting,
but it is evident that there will be a thaw in bilateral relations,"
Fuat Keyman, a professor of International Relations at Koc University
commented.
Keyman noted that Turkey must take the lead in softening relations
and stop pushing Armenia into a corner. "I believe that Turkey is
an important player in the Caucasus, Balkans and the Middle East. As
Turkey has more influence, Armenia is more and more isolated," he said,
making reference to three important projects that connect Georgia,
Azerbaijan and Turkey and bypass Armenia - the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
oil pipeline inaugurated in 2005, the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum natural gas
line opened end 2006 and the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway, construction
of which started this year. "Moreover, as Turkey's negotiation process
with the European Union advances, economic and cultural relations
will improve with Armenia," Keyman asserted.
There are internal difficulties that seem to narrow the scope of
bilateral dialogue, Kasim argued. The status of Nagorno Karabakh is
unlikely to benefit from whatever diplomatic thaw Turkey and Armenia
seek to achieve in the short term, both experts agreed. "Sargsyan is
of Karabakh origin, so are his supporters," noted Kasim, pointing to
difficulties the Armenian president might face even if he is willing to
adopt a policy change. "Even if the president is willing for progress,
it will be negotiated behind the scenes and made public at the last
minute," Kasim said.
Another point is the Armenian position, which holds that Armenia
is ready to talk without any preconditions. "This is propaganda by
Armenian because it is Turkey that brings conditions," Kasim said,
pointing out that no concrete policy changes have yet been proposed
by Yerevan.
It is unclear whether or not President Abdullah Gul will fly to
Yerevan for the match on Sept. 6.