Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: All quiet on EU front, several FP surprises on eastern front

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: All quiet on EU front, several FP surprises on eastern front

    Today's Zaman, Turkey
    Dec 28 2008


    All quiet on EU front, but several foreign policy surprises on eastern
    front


    It was February 2008 when Foreign Minister Ali Babacan pledged to
    surprise all with a new wave of EU reform, while admitting that there
    had been a considerable slowdown in the government's activity
    concerning the reforms necessary for the country's accession to the
    EU.


    `Reforms concerning the EU were affected because 2007 was an election
    year and Parliament was closed for a while. Perhaps 2007 was a lost
    year, but Turkey underwent a major test of democracy and emerged from
    this test strengthened and having accepted the reforms made so
    far. Now there is a new president, Parliament and government. Our
    infrastructure for continuing with a new wave of reform is ready,'
    Babacan said then. `2008 will be the year of the EU. It will be quite
    a different year. You will be surprised.'

    That didn't happen; on the contrary, there has been mutual
    disappointment on the EU and Turkish side, with the latter blaming the
    former for dragging its feet in opening more chapters although Ankara
    has fulfilled all technical requirements.

    According to EU Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn, the upcoming year
    will be an important litmus test of whether Turkey is serious about
    its EU accession goals.

    When suspending accession negotiations on eight chapters in 2006
    because of Turkey's refusal to open its air and sea ports to traffic
    from Greek Cyprus, the EU said it would review the situation in 2009.

    With the government giving no sign of a change in its policy of not
    budging on the issue until a permanent resolution is found to the
    decades-old Cyprus issue, analysts also do not expect any bold steps
    that would satisfy the EU's expectations, such as a constitutional
    reform, at least until after the local elections scheduled for March.

    The fact that there have been no positive surprises on the EU front,
    contrary to what was suggested by Babacan in early 2008, doesn't mean
    a complete absence of positive surprises in Turkey's foreign
    policy. Actually, there have been several when it comes to Turkey's
    neighbors on the eastern front.

    Taking pains in the Caucasus

    The rapprochement with its estranged neighbor Armenia, with whom it
    has no diplomatic relations, seems to be Turkey's boldest foreign
    policy initiative. Amidst secret talks between Armenian and Turkish
    diplomats that reportedly took place in Switzerland in early July, an
    open call by Armenian President Serzh Sarksyan to Turkey to launch `a
    fresh start' in relations between the estranged neighbors found a
    positive response in the Turkish capital.

    Eventually, President Abdullah Gül responded positively to
    Sarksyan's invitation to visit Yerevan to watch a game between the
    Armenian and Turkish national soccer teams on Sept. 6 in a FIFA World
    Cup 2010 qualifying match. The visit made Gül the first Turkish
    president to visit the Armenian capital.

    Armenia occupied Nagorno-Karabakh in southwestern Azerbaijan in the
    early 1990s after a protracted war between Azerbaijan and the
    Armenians of the mountainous region that began in the late 1980s. In a
    show of solidarity with Azerbaijan, Turkey severed its diplomatic ties
    and closed its border with Armenia and announced that Armenian
    withdrawal from Nagorno-Karabakh was a precondition for normalizing
    ties.

    Gül's visit started a new period of dialogue with
    Armenia. Later in September, on the sidelines of the UN General
    Assembly in New York, Babacan had three-way talks with Armenian
    Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian and Azerbaijani Foreign Minister
    Elmar Mammadyarov to discuss the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute.

    Preparations for a second such trilateral summit are under way, with
    Ambassador Ã`nal Ã?eviköz, the deputy undersecretary
    of the Foreign Ministry, having bilateral talks with his Armenian and
    Azerbaijani counterparts.

    Ankara, which has always described the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict as a
    problem not only for Azerbaijan but also for Turkey and the entire
    region, acknowledged that resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
    will have a positive impact on Armenian-Turkish relations.

    In the meantime, a regional platform for the Caucasus initiated by
    Turkey has made progress. Deputy foreign ministers of the five member
    countries of the Caucasus Stability and Cooperation Platform met on
    the sidelines of a meeting of the Organization for Security and
    Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) held in Helsinki in early December. It
    was the first time representatives from the group sat around the same
    table.

    Turkey proposed the platform for conflict resolution in the volatile
    Caucasus following a brief war between Russia and Georgia over the
    breakaway region of South Ossetia in August. The platform consists of
    Russia, Georgia, Turkey, Armenia and Azerbaijan.

    Strategic dialogue with Iraq

    A shadow cast over bilateral relations between Iraq and Turkey due to
    the presence of the outlawed Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) gradually
    dispersed during 2008, while Turkey also improved its relations with
    the regional Kurdish administration following a long hiatus after the
    US invasion of Iraq.

    The United States is cooperating with Turkey by providing intelligence
    on the PKK in Iraq and allowing Turks to use Iraqi airspace for aerial
    strikes on PKK targets in the northern part of the country. The Iraqi
    central administration in Baghdad also condemns PKK attacks but says
    it has little power in the Kurdish-run north to curb them. A land
    operation launched in February into northern Iraq against the PKK was
    followed by a landmark visit by Iraqi President Jalal Talabani.

    In July, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip ErdoÄ?an and his Iraqi
    counterpart, Nouri al-Maliki, during ErdoÄ?an's visit to
    Baghdad, signed a strategic partnership agreement that commits Turkey
    and Iraq to cooperation in the political, economic, energy, water,
    cultural, security and military fields. Gül, meanwhile, is
    expected to reciprocate Talabani's visit in early 2009.

    Foreign Minister Ali Babacan said in October that the Iraqi Kurds
    could be part of a three-way mechanism if the Baghdad administration
    agrees. Babacan also said then that Ankara was considering tripartite
    consultations with the United States and Iraq on ways to stop PKK
    attacks, as proposed by Talabani in a phone conversation with his
    Turkish counterpart, Gül, after an Oct. 3 attack by the PKK on
    a military outpost located near the border that left 17 soldiers dead.

    Last month, during a meeting in Baghdad, senior Iraqi, Turkish and US
    officials formed a joint committee to combat the PKK. The trilateral
    meeting was also attended by two representatives from the regional
    Kurdish administration in northern Iraq, including regional Interior
    Minister Karim Sinjari.

    The trilateral meeting and Babacan's remarks followed a meeting in
    Baghdad between a Foreign Ministry delegation headed by the Turkish
    special envoy for Iraq, Murat Ã-zçelik, and Iraqi Kurdish
    leader Massoud Barzani. The meeting broke a taboo in Turkish foreign
    policy following several years in which Ankara refused to have talks
    with the Kurdish administration, accusing it of supporting the PKK.

    Mediation between Israel, Syria

    Ankara's proactive foreign policy in 2008 was not limited to improving
    bilateral relations with its neighbors. Back in the spring of this
    year, despite news reports concerning Turkey's mediation between
    Israel and Syria, Ankara had been tightlipped concerning its
    efforts. The Turkish capital broke its silence in May only after
    Israeli and Syrian officials revealed that negotiations were taking
    place through Turkey.

    The talks are focused on the fate of the Golan Heights, a strategic
    plateau which Israel captured in 1967. Damascus wants the whole
    territory returned. Israel wants Syria to scale back ties with its
    main foes -- Iran, Palestinian Hamas and Lebanese Hezbullah.

    Yet talks were suspended about three months ago after Israeli Prime
    Minister Ehud Olmert decided to resign over a corruption scandal. The
    last round of direct talks between Israel and Syria stalled in 2000 in
    a dispute over how much of the Golan Heights should go back to Syria.

    `We're not seeking to show off. We do not hold unreasonable
    expectations, either. But Turkey will continue its efforts in a calm
    manner,' a senior government official told Today's Zaman at the time,
    displaying the Turkish capital's sincere eagerness to contribute to
    the maintenance of regional peace in the Middle East.

    Second summit with Afghanistan, Pakistan

    In early December, despite rising regional tension between New Delhi
    and Islamabad in the aftermath of the Nov. 26 terrorist attacks on
    multiple locations in Mumbai, Ankara managed to host a trilateral
    meeting of Turkey, Afghanistan and Pakistan for talks aimed at
    boosting cooperation between the two neighbors.

    The meeting, which gathered President Gül with his Afghan
    counterpart, Hamid Karzai, and Pakistani counterpart, Asif Ali
    Zardari, in Ä°stanbul, was actually a follow-up to an earlier
    trilateral summit in 2007.

    In the spring of 2007, Turkey arranged a meeting between Karzai and
    his then-Pakistani counterpart, Pervez Musharraf, after Kabul accused
    Islamabad of not doing enough to stop militants from entering
    Afghanistan from Pakistan.

    Ties between Karzai and Zardari's governments have improved, with
    signs of cooperation among Afghan, Pakistani and foreign troops,
    especially in dealing with cross-border movements of fighters and
    equipment.

    UN Security Council seat

    In October, Ankara's years of unrelenting effort to gain a seat on the
    UN Security Council bore fruit. While officials hailed Turkey's
    nonpermanent seat for 2009-2010 as a well-deserved reward for its
    diplomatic campaign for more influence in regional politics and
    reforms at home, analysts warned that the role in the UN's main
    decision-making body will also mean tough choices for Ankara,
    especially on whether its neighbor Iran should face sanctions over its
    nuclear program.

    The government, which has built good ties with Iran since it first
    came to power in 2002, advocates a peaceful solution to the row over
    Iran's nuclear program, but is against nuclear weapons in the Middle
    East.

    Election to the UN's powerful decision-making body has been widely
    interpreted as a boost for ErdoÄ?an's government, which has
    lobbied intensely for the position since it declared its candidacy in
    July 2003.

    A more active role will not only give Turkey the power to speak more
    forcefully on issues of national concern, such as Cyprus, but will
    also put Ankara in a tight spot over Iran's nuclear program and its
    relations with the United States. Turkey has also recently secured
    membership in the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the main
    international organization reporting on Tehran's nuclear program.

    External anchor and regional influence

    Turning back to relations with the EU, which were once described by
    Babacan as a vital external anchor for Turkey, all of these active and
    progressive foreign policy achievements by Ankara have been generously
    lauded by Brussels.

    Yet, the EU has also warned that none of these achievements can serve
    as a substitute for reforms. During a visit to Ankara in November, a
    European Parliament delegation led by Hannes Swoboda, the vice
    president of the Socialist Group in the European Parliament, made
    clear that those bold steps in the foreign policy field could be
    accepted as `an addition and complementary to reforms.'

    When reminded of this fact by the visiting delegation during their
    meeting with Gül, the president conceded, a European Parliament
    deputy who was at the meeting told Today's Zaman.

    `Turkey's strategic importance and regional influence in the East
    highly stems from its relation with the EU and its potential
    membership in the bloc,' Gül was quoted as telling the
    delegation in response.

    2009 will show everyone whether the government will also concede to
    this fact in its thorny relationship with Brussels.



    28 December 2008, Sunday
    EMÄ°NE KART ANKARA
Working...
X