Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: `Dig deeper into Dink murder-Ergenekon link'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: `Dig deeper into Dink murder-Ergenekon link'

    Today's Zaman, Turkey
    July 13 2008


    `Dig deeper into Dink murder-Ergenekon link'


    Cem Ã-zdemir, a member of the European Parliament, has said that
    Turkey has a very serious problem in the unanswered questions around
    the plot leading to the January 2007 assassination of Turkish-Armenian
    journalist Hrant Dink, particularly the issue of whether the murder
    was tied to the Ergenekon criminal network, which is currently the
    subject of a major investigation.


    Ã-zdemir expressed deep concern over the way the court case in the
    murder has been conducted and said he personally felt ashamed of the
    situation although he doesn't represent the Turkish Republic.

    `We're not talking about a banana republic, we're talking about one of
    the leading countries in the world. This is the Turkish Republic. I'm
    not in charge of this republic, I don't represent this republic, but I
    personally felt ashamed. So I would love to see a little bit more
    seriousness in the follow-up on this Hrant Dink case and, if there is
    a link to Ergenekon, it has to be followed up. There are serious
    accusations that there is a link between the Ergenekon case and the
    Hrant Dink murder case,' Ã-zdemir said in an interview with
    Sunday's Zaman.

    Ã-zdemir's arrival in Ankara -- where he met with President
    Abdullah Gül, accompanied by Renate Künast, the co-chair
    of the German Green Party -- came amidst widespread unrest in the
    country in the wake of an investigation into the Ergenekon network,
    which is accused of having plotted to stage a coup against the ruling
    Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government, and a closure
    case against the AK Party over allegations that it is seeking to
    establish an Islamist state.

    Ã-zdemir recalled Dink's 2004 report revealing that Sabiha
    Gökçen, the adopted daughter of Mustafa Kemal
    Atatürk, the founder of the Turkish Republic, was Armenian. The
    report had led to a harsh reaction from HurÅ?it Tolon, a former
    commander of the 1st Army Corps who was arrested this past weekend on
    charges of founding and leading the Ergenekon terrorist
    organization. Ã-zdemir says this report played a crucial role in
    turning Dink into a target.

    Following publication of the report by the Agos newsweekly, of which
    Dink had been the editor-in-chief, the Turkish daily Hürriyet
    approached Tolon and asked for comment on the report. The former
    commander then categorically called it `a crime against national
    unity.'

    `Of course, it is obvious that the Sabiha Gökçen report
    played a crucial role in this context,' he said.

    `Does carnation loom again without fear? Does dove fly again in the
    city?' These are questions asked by Sezen Aksu in a song
    `Güvercin,' (Dove) -- written and composed by Aksu in memory of
    slain Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink.

    `I am like a dove... Like a dove I have my eyes everywhere, in front
    of me, at the back, on the left, on the right. My head is as moving as
    the one of a dove... And fast enough to turn in an instant,' Dink had
    said in his last article, which was published on Jan. 19, 2007, the
    day when he was shot dead outside the offices of the bilingual
    (Armenian-Turkish) Agos weekly. He was the founder and editor-in-chief
    of Agos.

    Cem Ã-zdemir, a member of the European Parliament who was in Turkey
    for various meetings this week and who has his friend Dink's picture
    on the opening page of his personal Web page, has a clear answer for
    Aksu's questions. He apparently believes that neither will the
    carnation bloom again without fear nor will the dove fly again in the
    city unless all aspects of Dink's murder are thoroughly resolved.

    Ã-zdemir was here in Turkey this week with Renate Künast,
    co-chair of the German Green Party, for various talks in
    Ä°stanbul and Ankara. On Monday he attended the sixth hearing in
    the case of the plot leading to the 2007 assassination of Dink, held
    at the Ä°stanbul Criminal Court. The two parliamentarians met
    with President Abdullah Gül in Ankara on Wednesday. German
    Ambassador Eckart Cuntz hosted a reception at his residence in honor
    of Ã-zdemir and Künast on Wednesday evening.

    The reception was well attended, probably because the German
    parliamentarians' meeting with Gül came amid widespread unrest
    in the country in the wake of an investigation into the Ergenekon
    criminal network -- accused of having plotted to stage a coup against
    the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government -- and a
    closure case against the ruling party over allegations it seeks to
    establish an Islamist state.

    Ã-zdemir, meanwhile, also made a kind suggestion for HurÅ?it
    Tolon, a former commander of the 1st Army Corps who was arrested last
    weekend on charges of founding and leading the Ergenekon terrorist
    organization.

    Having remembered what Tolon had said in 2004, when Dink's Agos scored
    a scoop in 2004 and revealed that Sabiha Gökçen, Turkish
    Republic founder Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's adopted daughter, was
    Armenian, Ã-zdemir said it might be a good idea for Tolon to look
    into the Turkish Constitution to re-examine the definition of Turkish
    citizenship.

    Following publication of the report by Agos, Turkish daily
    Hürriyet approached Tolon and asked for his comment on the
    report. The former commander then categorically called it `a crime
    against national unity.'

    Your arrival here came amid an ongoing countdown to the end the
    closure case against the AK Party and the upcoming start of the
    Ergenekon case. But the main reason for your visit's timing was the
    Dink case. What impressions will you take back to Germany after
    Monday's hearing?

    One thing I want to say is after being at the Dink case, it is very
    obvious, you don't have to be an expert; just by listening to what was
    said there it is quite obvious that this case cannot be limited to the
    people who appeared before that court. This is beyond the people who
    appeared there, it's very obvious; I mean the question is still
    unanswered: What happened with the information that the gendarmerie
    got? Where did this information go, who reacted how, how was this
    information judged and why were no steps beyond that ever taken to
    save the life of my brother and friend Hrant Dink? This question
    remains to be answered. And as long as this question is unanswered,
    Turkey has a very serious problem.

    The second thing is that we are not talking about a banana republic,
    we're talking about one of the leading countries of the world. This
    court did not give a very good impression to me. I mean the whole
    thing -- starting from the room to the technical limitations -- I mean
    practically everything, the way that the lawyers of Hrant Dink's
    family and the ones who are involved in this murder case have to share
    a microphone, have to stand half a meter away from each other. I mean,
    what is this?

    This is the Turkish Republic. I'm not in charge of this republic, I
    don't represent this republic, but I personally felt ashamed. So, I
    would love to see a little bit more seriousness in the follow-up to
    this Hrant Dink case and if there is a link to Ergenekon, it has to be
    followed up. There are serious accusations that there is a link
    between the Ergenekon case and the Hrant Dink murder case.

    You already expressed your concerns about the composition of the court
    and a will to examine the alleged connection between the two
    cases. Are you able to see a will for doing so?

    I'm not in a position to make suggestions to the court; this is up to
    the court. But one thing is for sure: After I listened to the
    confessions and the expressions there, it is very obvious that other
    people need to appear at this court. Let me give you an example, I
    mean the fact that Hrant Dink was called to the Vali
    Yardımcısı [deputy governor] and the kind of
    dialogue that happened there, I mean, it leaves very, very serious
    question marks. Has this been followed up? Was he questioned? And a
    number of other people I could tell about. From the gendarmes [a
    paramilitary force for internal security] in Trabzon to security
    guards and it is clear: If this country is a secular country, if
    everyone's life has the same worth in this country -- independent of
    Hrant being an Armenian or a Circassian or a believer or a
    non-believer, whatever he was, he was killed and whoever the murderer
    was needs to be punished. Whoever they are, wherever they are; and to
    me we're at the beginning of the case, not the end.

    We may now know 10 percent of what we need to know, and the other 90
    percent is also an answer to the security questions in Turkey, to the
    Gladio problem, to the problem of Susurluk, to the problem of
    Å?emdinli, all of which I believe is linked to each other. You
    cannot separate them from one another. It is obvious. There are people
    in Turkey who think that they are above the law, people in Turkey who
    think that they have been `given a mission.' And that's not acceptable
    in any democracy and therefore, first of all, I encourage the
    government and encourage the Turkish democracy to follow up on
    that. On the other hand, I also ask them to do this in a way that is
    proper and in a democratic way that is completely based on the rule of
    law.

    When do you think Hrant Dink became a target? In the autumn of 2005,
    when he was given a six-month suspended sentence for insulting
    `Turkishness,' or when he wrote the report on Sabiha
    Gökçen?

    Of course, it is obvious that the Sabiha Gökçen report
    played a crucial role in this context. Some people think that it is an
    insult if you say that the adopted daughter¦ What is wrong with
    that, I mean the Armenians are citizens of this country. It is not an
    insult if you call somebody an Armenian. This is a normal thing. I
    mean if somebody calls me of Turkish origin in Germany -- I'm a German
    citizen -- I don't see this as an insult. So it shouldn't be an insult
    to say that she is of Armenian origin. I'll understand that¦ But I
    don't understand the statement of HurÅ?it Tolon, to be honest,
    as he said at the time that it was unacceptable that
    Gökçen's name was brought in an Armenian context. Sorry,
    this is the understanding of the Turkish nationals. People are Turkish
    citizens as an umbrella and they can be of Armenian origin -- they can
    be of any origin. I'm not in a position to tell HurÅ?it Tolon
    the understanding of Turkish citizenship, but maybe he should look in
    the Constitution.

    What was the message you got at the meeting with Gül?

    First of all, he thanked us Greens and said we are always honest when
    we criticize Turkey and that we criticize Turkey as friends because we
    want a more democratic Turkey and because we kept our promise that
    such a Turkey deserves to become a member of the European Union. He
    differentiated between those who criticize because they don't want
    Turkey in the European Union. That is, I think he shared his
    observations.

    And the second point is that he was optimistic, rather optimistic,
    saying that he knows that Turkey is getting through difficult times
    but in the end Turkey will succeed and democracy will succeed.

    Do you share the president's optimism?

    I mean, who am I to say something different from Mr. Gül? If
    Mr. Gül is optimistic, I have to be optimistic as well. I
    believe that wisdom is here, I believe there is also wisdom in the
    Constitutional Court and I believe that at the end of the day wisdom
    will succeed because I cannot imagine that Turkey has an intention,
    that anybody here in this country can have this serious intention to
    harm Turkey, to stop Turkey from moving forward, to push Turkey
    back. I can imagine a lot of people in Europe who want that, but I
    cannot imagine that they have fans here in Turkey. I cannot imagine
    that somebody will push the Constitutional Court or that somebody in
    the army or somebody in politics or somebody in the media can have an
    interest in supporting Mr. Sarkozy. We will find out at the end of the
    day how many fans Mr. Sarkozy has in Turkey.

    13 July 2008, Sunday
    EMÄ°NE KART ANKARA
Working...
X