Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

European Union: Democratization Key To Conflict Resolution In South

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • European Union: Democratization Key To Conflict Resolution In South

    EUROPEAN UNION: DEMOCRATIZATION KEY TO CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN SOUTH CAUCASUS
    Jean-Christophe Peuch

    EurasiaNet
    June 17 2008
    NY

    The European Union views the establishment of democracy and rule of
    law in Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan as being critical elements in
    the resolution of post-Soviet conflicts of Abkhazia, South Ossetia,
    and Nagorno-Karabakh.

    "Without stability, without a consensus around the rules of the game in
    terms of democratic institutions, elections, and so on, there will not
    be a basis for a mutually beneficial relationship based on mutual trust
    and common values with the [EU]," the bloc's special representative
    for the South Caucasus, Peter Semneby, said in a June 12 interview,
    shortly after addressing the Permanent Council of the Organization
    for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) behind closed doors.

    Pointing to what he called the "very rough" election period
    Georgia and Armenia have gone through recently, and to Azerbaijan's
    upcoming presidential polls, Semneby added that, in his view, lack
    of progress in the field of democratization will make it even more
    difficult both for those countries and the international community
    to deal with regional conflicts. "I am deeply convinced that only by
    having legitimate, strong governments will it be possible to make the
    difficult decisions that will have to be made in overcoming [those]
    conflict situations," he said.

    Semneby said he devoted a large part of his address to the OSCE to
    recent developments in all three conflict zones, especially to the
    situation in Georgia's separatist republic of Abkhazia, which he
    described as "very volatile and worrying." "There is a need to lower
    the temperature in that conflict, both on the Georgian-Abkhaz level
    and the Georgian-Russian level," he said. [For background see the
    Eurasia Insight archive].

    Tensions between Moscow and Tbilisi have been increasing since
    early March. In the course of the past three months, Russia has
    withdrawn from the 1996 CIS sanctions regime on Abkhazia, sent
    additional peacekeepers to the region -- allegedly without notifying
    Georgia -- and dispatched railway troops to reconstruct the depleted
    Sukhumi-Ochamchira railroad. In addition, then-Russian President
    Vladimir Putin on April 16 instructed his government to build closer
    ties with Abkhazia and Georgia's other separatist republic of South
    Ossetia. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive].

    In late May, the United Nations Observation Mission in Georgia
    (UNOMIG) released an investigative report that pointed to Russia's
    involvement in the shooting down of a Georgian military drone
    over Abkhazia on April 20. Although UNOMIG also blamed Georgia for
    carrying observation flights over Abkhazia, Moscow has described the
    report as "biased." [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive].
    http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/in sight/articles/eav042308f.shtml

    Russia's moves and the quasi-unanimous international criticism that
    ensued have galvanized Georgia into renewing calls for a revision of
    the existing conflict resolution format. In particular, Tbilisi is
    pressing for the replacement of Russian peacekeepers that have been
    stationed in Abkhazia since 1994 under a joint UN-CIS mandate with
    Georgian and Abkhaz police troops under international supervision.

    Georgia's efforts to have the peace mechanisms modified have so far
    received limited, though symbolically significant, international
    support. On June 5, the European Parliament approved a resolution
    that urged Moscow to immediately withdraw all its additional forces
    from Abkhazia. Arguing that the Russian troops had "lost their role
    of neutral and impartial peacekeepers," the European MPs also called
    for a revision of the existing peacekeeping format and suggested that
    the EU's Council "consider bolstering the international presence in
    the conflict zone by sending a [European Security and Defense Policy]
    border mission to the region."

    Semneby told EurasiaNet that he believed neither the timing nor
    conditions were ripe for an attempt at revising the peacekeeping
    format. "I know there are some expectations that the EU should
    contribute to a mission. The Georgians are asking us to do this. This
    is still a hypothetical discussion. We need a basic understanding from
    all the parties on this issue. We do not think that any precipitated
    action should be taken," he said.

    The EU envoy sounded equally noncommittal when asked whether Brussels
    would consider acting as the guarantor of a nonaggression pact between
    Tbilisi and Sukhumi, a suggestion Georgia's Deputy Prime Minister
    Giorgi Baramidze made on June 6. "In general the EU is ready to be
    more involved and we're ready to discuss any proposal. But a question
    like this is very hypothetical," he said.

    UN-sponsored peace negotiations between Sukhumi and Tbilisi have
    been suspended since 2006, when Tbilisi dispatched police troops to
    the Upper Kodori Gorge, the only part of Abkhazia that remains under
    Tbilisi's control. Georgian officials insist that security forces
    in the Kodori Gorge are being used only in a local law-enforcement
    capacity. As a prerequisite to reviving talks, Abkhazia demanded
    that Georgia recall its troops and commit itself to not resuming
    hostilities.

    Abkhazia's leader Sergei Bagapsh reiterated those demands after
    meeting with Javier Solana, the EU's High Representative for Common
    Foreign and Security Policy, on June 6. He also said that Sukhumi
    opposes the withdrawal of Russian peacekeepers.

    Solana traveled to Abkhazia as part of a two-day mission to Georgia --
    the aim of which, according to Semneby, was "to see what could be done
    to stabilize that very volatile and worrying situation and identify
    whether there is a way that the EU can be more involved in terms of
    supporting a stabilization and eventually a settlement."

    The EU has allocated more than $45 million to Abkhazia's rehabilitation
    and has a liaison police officer stationed with UNOMIG. Yet, its
    political involvement in Georgia's protracted conflicts remains fairly
    limited, if only because EU member states disagree on that issue. Some
    countries argue that those conflicts are already dealt with by the UN
    and the OSCE, while others insist that the bloc should seek greater
    political involvement to counterbalance Russia.

    After an alleged Russian missile landed in the Georgian-held part of
    South Ossetia in August 2007, EU member states decided to develop an ad
    hoc instrument -- called an Incident Assessment Mechanism (IAM). This
    body is designed to provide independent assessments of such incidents
    outside the bloc's borders. Although the IAM is now operational,
    Semneby said it was not activated after the shoot-down of the Georgian
    drone in order not to interfere with the UNOMIG investigation.

    While the question of a greater EU involvement in the Abkhaz conflict
    remains hypothetical, Semneby says Brussels is willing, if asked to
    do so, to facilitate contacts between the parties. "Any contact can
    take place without a mediation and a process that can take place
    without a mediation is better than [a process that takes place]
    with a mediation," Semneby said in reference to the visit Georgia's
    Ambassador to the UN, Irakli Alasania, made in May to Sukhumi.
Working...
X