Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Billboard Q & A: Serj Tankian

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Billboard Q & A: Serj Tankian

    Billboard
    March 29, 2008


    THE BILLBOARD Q&A: SERJ TANKIAN

    by CORTNEY HARDING


    SERJ TANKIAN For This Veteran Rocker, Making An Environmental Impact
    Is A Way Of Life by Cortney Harding

    A few days before the fifth anniversary of the Iraq War, Serj Tankian
    is sitting in an Austin hotel room and ruminating on the costs of the
    endless battle. But Tankian isn't talking about dead soldiers or
    civilians; he's talking about the cost to the Middle East's
    environment, an issue that few people have raised. "The topsoil there
    has been destroyed," he says, "and who knows what kind of damage all
    those bombs have caused to the ecosystems in the Middle East?"

    Many bands these days are claiming the "green" label, but their
    concern often starts at the merch table and ends at the recycling
    bin. Not so for the System of a Down frontman-turned-solo artist, who
    sees beyond silos and realizes that issues like electoral reform,
    recognition of the Armenian genocide, poverty and the environment are
    all related. As the four-day industry party that is South by
    Southwest rages below him, Tankian is serious but not humorless; clad
    in jeans and a T-shirt, he fiddles with his iPhone and shows off
    pictures of his dog before settling in to ponder weightier issues.
    Later that night, he brings the seething, schmoozing Stubb's crowd to
    a halt when he plays three haunting acoustic tracks at a show to
    celebrate the release of the "Body of War" documentary.

    For Tankian, preaching about taking action is not enough. Rather than
    simply paying lip service to green issues, he founded a Web site,
    skyisover.net, to connect his fans to environmental and social
    justice organizations. He also fuses the message to his music and the
    accompanying visuals; the video for "Sky Is Over" shows him literally
    erasing the sky, a comment on the growing deterioration of the ozone
    layer.

    He also founded a nonprofit, Axis of Justice, with former Rage
    Against the Machine guitarist Tom Morello. "Serj and Tom are really
    committed to getting music fans to get involved with local
    organizations and be active on a grass-roots level," AOJ media
    director Jake Sexton says. "Serj is extremely informed about how the
    way we live our lives impacts others and the need to a change in
    consciousness."

    "The organization has grown and morphed, and we really see the
    environment as being tied to social justice and human rights causes,"
    Morello says. "We both realize that while people can do things on a
    person-by-person basis to make the world more green, massive levers
    need to be thrown to cause any real change."

    Tankian is spreading his green message on the road and working with
    environmental nonprofit Reverb to make sure that his current tour
    leaves as small a carbon footprint as possible. With the
    organization, he ensures all the food served backstage is organic and
    locally grown, that recycling bins are available throughout the
    venues and that fans can buy energy credits to offset their travel to
    the show. Still, Tankian recognizes that it's not enough. "This is
    all great," he says, "but it's not going to stop the destruction.
    Right now the Earth has a fever, and based on the accelerated rate of
    population growth, the way we live now is completely unsustainable."

    Many artists are becoming more active in promoting green issues, but
    you seem to be one of the few who actually go a step beyond and
    connect environmental issues to issues of poverty and war. How do you
    see the relationships between these causes?

    For me, it all stems from the need to promote justice. I called my
    organization Axis of Justice because I didn't want to focus on only
    one issue. The connections can be drawn because they are present in
    so many places; for instance, poor urban neighborhoods have higher
    asthma rates. When a city wants to build a dump or get rid of
    radioactive waste, they don't put it in the nice part of town. Even
    materials that are supposed to be environmentally friendly can be
    harmful to poor communities. Biodiesel, for example, uses up farmland
    that could otherwise be used to grow food for starving people.

    How did you first get involved in green issues?

    I've been a supporter of Greenpeace and the Sierra Club for years. I
    have a place in New Zealand, and I was really impressed with a
    Greenpeace action that took place down there recently. Greenpeace
    folks boarded a Japanese whaling ship to try to shut it down, and in
    the midst of the conflict, both ships ran out of fuel. When a rescue
    ship came, the Greenpeace people tried to disconnect the fuel lines
    to the whaling ship, even though it meant they'd be stuck as well. It
    was kind of crazy, but sometimes you have to be ballsy and put
    yourself out.

    Do you ever worry that you are just preaching to the choir and the
    people who are driving around in Hummers and living in McMansions are
    just ignoring the message?

    I sat next to an oil executive on the flight to Austin, and he
    started talking to me about how absurd it was that every day when he
    drives to work, the highways are full but trams and buses are empty.
    I think people are starting to hear what environmentalists are
    saying. "An Inconvenient Truth" was a huge wake-up call for a lot of
    people.

    Have you ever been confronted with having to eat costs to be greener?
    Have you paid extra upfront for organic merch or greener touring? If
    so, how much?

    Absolutely. Awareness always has a built-in economic cost, though in
    some cases green materials have become more competitive as far as
    pricing. We pay more for our merch items so that we can be sure that
    they are made with equitable labor and ecological practices. As far
    as investments [go], going green means that the return on your
    investment is less than investing in the corporate world, at least
    for now. This does not mean that you can't be profitable and
    conscious. It just means that there is a real-life cost to being more
    aware; hybrid cars cost more than non-hybrid cars of the same make,
    for example. It would be great to encourage large industries to
    reverse this policy. For example, if car companies made hybrids the
    same price as regular cars, more hybrids would be sold and that would
    have a positive effect on pollution.

    What is the dynamic of those business decisions? Do you see a payoff
    further down the road or just eat the cost because being good to the
    planet matters more?

    The payoff for those decisions is not somewhere in the future, it's
    now. I feel better about the way I live now and that's my payoff. I
    do things because it's the right thing to do now. I don't know what
    the future brings. In reality, the future never really exists. It's a
    design of the logical mind.

    This is all great, but I'm wondering how you justify being part of an
    industry that produces so much waste every years. You've sold more
    than 10 million CDs, and many of those were in plastic containers
    that had to be shipped to stores.

    Basically, we're all hypocrites unless we go out and live off the
    land. That way of living is a model for me, because I think those
    people are clued in about climate change and the way we're going to
    have to alter our lives. I spend a lot of the record talking about
    the end of civilization, and I don't mean an apocalypse. I think that
    we are going to have to come to terms with the fact that the way we
    live now will not exist in 50 years, period.

    Along those same lines, you have been touring for this record, and
    while you have carbon offset programs in place, you are still using a
    lot of resources and putting a lot of goods out there. How do you
    reconcile that with your belief system?

    Again, I realize I am a hypocrite by going on the road and doing
    this. I've had an idea for a long time, which might sound a little
    crazy, but I really want to look into holographic touring. I think we
    could reduce our need to travel if we could project ourselves into
    meetings and concerts. We have the technology, and we're not using it
    right now.

    For instance, I have a studio next to my house and a live performance
    room in the studio. I could broadcast a show in real time and could
    interact with the audience as if we were in the same room. After all,
    it's not like the audience can touch me, anyway [laughs]. It would
    open up a whole new world for touring -- shows wouldn't have to be
    limited to bars or clubs. There would be no travel costs, so bands
    with very little money could play shows, and tickets would cost less.

    Well, even though that is still in the future, at least bands right
    now are starting to become more conscious. Do you worry, though, that
    being green might just be another trend for musicians and will be
    forgotten in a few years? After all, how many people do you hear
    still talking about Tibet?

    I'm not a big trend follower, so I don't know if this is just another
    blip. I think that with the ice caps melting and everything changing,
    bands and everyone else on the planet won't have much of a choice
    about becoming green. I look at a place like New Zealand, which is
    ecologically one of the most progressive places on earth. People down
    there are unconsciously conscious -- they don't get
    self-congratulatory when they recycle, they just do it as a way of
    life. I think we need more education to get us to that place.

    While bands are also becoming greener, they seem to be less
    interested in other issues, like electoral politics. Would you agree
    with that?

    I think a lot of bands are coming out for this election, many more
    than the previous few. Howard Dean had some good support and momentum
    in 2004, but it collapsed quickly. I'm an Obama fan, but I have to
    say I was disappointed when I found out he wanted to expand the
    defense budget. Still, he has done a good job getting younger people
    invested in the process and teaching them about the way party
    politics work.

    You just performed at a concert for the anti-war movie "Body of War"
    and have a song on the soundtrack. What other musical plans do you
    have for the near future?

    I'm going to continue touring behind the new record, and I'm also
    working on some music for film. I might be working on a score for a
    theatrical production, too. My next record will be a jazz orchestral
    record; I want it to have a whole different vibe than the last one. I
    want to be able to play Carnegie Hall with the new one. I'm planning
    on releasing it in 2009. I never studied music; I ran a software
    company before I did any of this. I've been lucky that I've done so
    well and been able to make the music I want to make.

    You've used your position as a popular musician to spread the word
    about a number of causes. Have you gotten any backlash or flack from
    your fans?

    I wrote an essay called "Understanding Oil" after 9-11 that led to me
    being called a traitor and stations dropping our songs. The sad thing
    is, now that the war has been on for five years, people are coming up
    to me and telling me I was right.

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X