Tweet
Robert Fisk's World: A fair point: Everyone is equal in their suffering
during wartime
Independent.co.uk
Saturday, 14 February 2009
The third and very final part of the "normality" of war. I have just
finished reading Lyn Smith's Forgotten Voices of the Holocaust. I admit
to a personal interest. Lyn is a friend of mine for whom I have been
recording my memories of Middle East wars for the Imperial War Museum.
Nothing I have ever seen can equal this, however, and I can give only
one example from the terrifying, outrageously brave and moving book
this is.
It is the testimony of Leon Greenman, a British Jewish inmate of
Auschwitz-Birkenau who arrived at the extermination camp with his wife
and child. It speaks for itself. All other passages pale beside it:
"We were bullied out of the train and stood about waiting. It must have
been about half past two in the morning. It was dark, a blue light was
shining on the platform. We saw a few SS men walking up and down. They
separated the men from the women. So I stood right in front of the men
and I could see my wife there with the child in her arms. She threw me
a kiss and she showed the baby ... Then one of the prisoners in a
striped uniform commanded us to follow him. Well, we turned to the left
and walked a little way for two or three minutes. A truck arrived,
stopped near us and on the truck were all the women, children, babies
and in the centre my wife and child standing up. They stood up to the
light as if it was meant to be like that ` so that I could recognise
them. A picture I'll never forget. All these were supposed to have gone
to the bathroom to have a bath, to eat and to live. Instead they had to
undress and go into the gas chambers, and two hours later those people
were ashes, including my wife and child."
I recalled this searing passage this week when I received a letter from
a reader, taking me to task for my "constant downplaying of the
suffering of the Palestinians on the grounds that their deaths and
suffering are minimal when compared with that of the Second World War".
Now, I should say at once that this is a bit unfair. I was especially
taking exception to a Palestinian blog now going the rounds which shows
a queue of Palestinian women at one of Israel's outrageous roadblocks
and a (slightly) cropped picture of the Auschwitz selection ramp, the
same platform upon which Leon Greenman was separated from his young
wife and child more than 60 years ago. The picture of the Palestinian
women is based on a lie; they are not queuing to be exterminated.
Racist, inhumane and, sometimes deadly ` Palestinian women have died at
these infernal checkpoints ` but they are not queuing to be murdered.
Yet our reader does have a point. The Second World War, she says, "does
0Aput it in a category apart ... but surely if one is caught up in any
war and sees one's loved ones killed or maimed, one's home destroyed
... then that must be the greatest cataclysm in one's life. The fact
that a hundred others, a thousand, a hundred thousand, a million are
suffering likewise is immaterial to the individual's suffering. The
Second World War lasted six years. The Palestinian suffering has lasted
over sixty..."
And yes, I'll go along with this. If it's an individual being
deliberately killed, then this is no less terrible than any other
individual, albeit that this second person may be one of six million
others. The point, of course, is the centrality of the Holocaust and `
Israel's constant refrain ` its exclusivity. Actually, the Armenian
Holocaust ` as I've said on umpteen occasions ` is also central to all
genocide studies. The same system of death marches, of camps, of
primitive asphyxiation, even a few young German officers in Turkey
watching the genocide in 1915 and then using the same methods on Jews
in the occupied Soviet Union. Numbers matter.
But our reader has another point. "After all," she says, "in the Second
World War, after the entry of the US and USSR on our side, people could
feel pretty positive about the outcome. But where is such hope for the
Palestinians? And now to cap the horror the BBC is refusing to even
show an appeal to help Gaza..." I'm not at all sure that W Churchill
Esq would have entirely placed such confidence in the outcome of the
Second World War ` he was initially worried that the Americans would
use up their firepower on the Japanese rather than against Hitler's
Germany.
I think, however, there is yet one more point. The rules of war ` the
Geneva Conventions and all the other post-Second World War laws ` were
meant to prevent another Holocaust. They were specifically designed to
ensure that no one should ever again face the destruction of Mrs
Greenman and her child. They were surely not made only for one race of
people. And it is these rules which Israel so disgracefully flouted in
Gaza. It's a bit like the refrain from Lord Blair of Kut al-Amara and a
whole host of other apparatchiks when the torture at Abu Ghraib was
revealed. Well, yes, they told us, it was bad ` but not as bad as
Saddam Hussein's regime.
And of course, this argument leads to perdition. True, we were bad `
but not as bad as the Baath party. Or the Khmer Rouge. Or Hitler's
Germany and the SS. Or the Ottoman Turks ` though I noticed movingly
that one of Lyn's Jewish Holocaust survivors mentions the Armenians.
No, the numbers game works both ways. A thousand Palestinians die in
Gaza. But what if the figure were 10,000? Or 100,000? No, no, of course
that wouldn't happen. But the rules of war are made for all to obey.
Yes, I know that the Jews of Europe had no Hamas to provide the Nazis
with an excuse for their deaths. But a Palestinian woman and her child
are as worthy of life as a Jewish woman and her child on the back of a
lorry in Auschwitz.
during wartime
Independent.co.uk
Saturday, 14 February 2009
The third and very final part of the "normality" of war. I have just
finished reading Lyn Smith's Forgotten Voices of the Holocaust. I admit
to a personal interest. Lyn is a friend of mine for whom I have been
recording my memories of Middle East wars for the Imperial War Museum.
Nothing I have ever seen can equal this, however, and I can give only
one example from the terrifying, outrageously brave and moving book
this is.
It is the testimony of Leon Greenman, a British Jewish inmate of
Auschwitz-Birkenau who arrived at the extermination camp with his wife
and child. It speaks for itself. All other passages pale beside it:
"We were bullied out of the train and stood about waiting. It must have
been about half past two in the morning. It was dark, a blue light was
shining on the platform. We saw a few SS men walking up and down. They
separated the men from the women. So I stood right in front of the men
and I could see my wife there with the child in her arms. She threw me
a kiss and she showed the baby ... Then one of the prisoners in a
striped uniform commanded us to follow him. Well, we turned to the left
and walked a little way for two or three minutes. A truck arrived,
stopped near us and on the truck were all the women, children, babies
and in the centre my wife and child standing up. They stood up to the
light as if it was meant to be like that ` so that I could recognise
them. A picture I'll never forget. All these were supposed to have gone
to the bathroom to have a bath, to eat and to live. Instead they had to
undress and go into the gas chambers, and two hours later those people
were ashes, including my wife and child."
I recalled this searing passage this week when I received a letter from
a reader, taking me to task for my "constant downplaying of the
suffering of the Palestinians on the grounds that their deaths and
suffering are minimal when compared with that of the Second World War".
Now, I should say at once that this is a bit unfair. I was especially
taking exception to a Palestinian blog now going the rounds which shows
a queue of Palestinian women at one of Israel's outrageous roadblocks
and a (slightly) cropped picture of the Auschwitz selection ramp, the
same platform upon which Leon Greenman was separated from his young
wife and child more than 60 years ago. The picture of the Palestinian
women is based on a lie; they are not queuing to be exterminated.
Racist, inhumane and, sometimes deadly ` Palestinian women have died at
these infernal checkpoints ` but they are not queuing to be murdered.
Yet our reader does have a point. The Second World War, she says, "does
0Aput it in a category apart ... but surely if one is caught up in any
war and sees one's loved ones killed or maimed, one's home destroyed
... then that must be the greatest cataclysm in one's life. The fact
that a hundred others, a thousand, a hundred thousand, a million are
suffering likewise is immaterial to the individual's suffering. The
Second World War lasted six years. The Palestinian suffering has lasted
over sixty..."
And yes, I'll go along with this. If it's an individual being
deliberately killed, then this is no less terrible than any other
individual, albeit that this second person may be one of six million
others. The point, of course, is the centrality of the Holocaust and `
Israel's constant refrain ` its exclusivity. Actually, the Armenian
Holocaust ` as I've said on umpteen occasions ` is also central to all
genocide studies. The same system of death marches, of camps, of
primitive asphyxiation, even a few young German officers in Turkey
watching the genocide in 1915 and then using the same methods on Jews
in the occupied Soviet Union. Numbers matter.
But our reader has another point. "After all," she says, "in the Second
World War, after the entry of the US and USSR on our side, people could
feel pretty positive about the outcome. But where is such hope for the
Palestinians? And now to cap the horror the BBC is refusing to even
show an appeal to help Gaza..." I'm not at all sure that W Churchill
Esq would have entirely placed such confidence in the outcome of the
Second World War ` he was initially worried that the Americans would
use up their firepower on the Japanese rather than against Hitler's
Germany.
I think, however, there is yet one more point. The rules of war ` the
Geneva Conventions and all the other post-Second World War laws ` were
meant to prevent another Holocaust. They were specifically designed to
ensure that no one should ever again face the destruction of Mrs
Greenman and her child. They were surely not made only for one race of
people. And it is these rules which Israel so disgracefully flouted in
Gaza. It's a bit like the refrain from Lord Blair of Kut al-Amara and a
whole host of other apparatchiks when the torture at Abu Ghraib was
revealed. Well, yes, they told us, it was bad ` but not as bad as
Saddam Hussein's regime.
And of course, this argument leads to perdition. True, we were bad `
but not as bad as the Baath party. Or the Khmer Rouge. Or Hitler's
Germany and the SS. Or the Ottoman Turks ` though I noticed movingly
that one of Lyn's Jewish Holocaust survivors mentions the Armenians.
No, the numbers game works both ways. A thousand Palestinians die in
Gaza. But what if the figure were 10,000? Or 100,000? No, no, of course
that wouldn't happen. But the rules of war are made for all to obey.
Yes, I know that the Jews of Europe had no Hamas to provide the Nazis
with an excuse for their deaths. But a Palestinian woman and her child
are as worthy of life as a Jewish woman and her child on the back of a
lorry in Auschwitz.