Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: Would It Be Traitorous If We Were All Hrant For A Day?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: Would It Be Traitorous If We Were All Hrant For A Day?

    WOULD IT BE TRAITOROUS IF WE WERE ALL HRANT FOR A DAY?
    Alin Ozinian

    Today's Zaman
    http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.d o?load=detay&link=165172&bolum=109
    Jan 27 2009
    Turkey

    I was in either my first or second year of middle school -- I can't
    recall which exactly -- but it seems to me that it was the winter
    months.

    That night, on one of the open forum television programs so common in
    that era was a man whose name we were not used to seeing on television
    screens. "I am not going to plant trees anymore; now I'm going to
    plant things that grow quickly, things like tomatoes, parsley. ... I
    don't really see a tree sapling as a tree."

    He was talking about the Tuzla Children's Camp, which had been recently
    taken over by the government. It was a camp where he had spent his own
    childhood, a camp where he had fallen in love with the woman who was
    to be his wife, the camp where he acted as a father figure to other
    orphans, and a camp that had fruits on its trees which he was never
    able to eat. He was saying: "We are discomforted; we are afraid;
    we are victimized by discrimination; we are unable to stand up and
    fight for our rights."

    I was surprised to hear all this at the time, knowing that these were
    things we normally only discussed at home, things which were actually
    better never discussed at all. The ground had ears. But now here was
    this man, talking about these things out loud. He was talking about
    matters having to do with the wealth tax, Sept. 6-7 and the military.

    He was not afraid, but his voice was shaking, his eyes were full,
    and it seemed as though he would cry. We, too, felt that way. There
    were things that really changed that night; Turkey did not become a
    more democratic country overnight; it was not suddenly accepted into
    the European Union; the Turkish-Armenian borders were not flung open;
    the hawks we feared were not magically turned into doves, but what
    did happen was that a man was suddenly talking out loud about Armenian
    problems. His name was Hrant Dink.

    It was sometime during mid-December 2006 that Hrant and I were
    speaking together in his office at Agos newspaper. He was commenting
    on the points that the Armenian diaspora were angry about, and he
    was complaining that the dialogue between Turkey and Armenia was
    still insufficient. He said we, the Turkish-Armenians, were the
    healthiest. He noted, "Everyone carries around old and judgmental
    pictures in their minds, but our friends, neighbors, doctors, lovers
    are all Turkish, and these are Turks that are a part of our lives." He
    had his doubts; he was not without hope, but there was worry in his
    eyes. He said, "I am being targeted," and his voice sounded tired
    from these worries.

    It was the second week of January 2007. I was in Yerevan, and the
    telephone rang. Someone said, "They've shot Hrant." I asked, "Where,
    which hospital is he in?" "They shot him," said the person calling
    me. "Where is he though? Is he badly hurt?" I asked. The person on
    the other end just said, "They shot him." It was a voice that told me
    of the weeping crowds in front of the Agos newspaper, of the pigeons
    in the air, of Hrant's wife saying, "You have created killers from
    babies." People carrying posters and signs in their hands, crowds
    saying: "We are all Hrant. We are all Armenian" as one. It was a bad
    coincidence; it was winter once again, and just as that evening I
    remembered from 10 years before, I was in deep surprise. I recalled
    when I had first seen Hrant on the screen. I was a child at the time
    and had been excited, filled with hope. But now all these hopes were
    shattered and lying on the ground.

    The fact that the funeral ceremonies for Hrant turned into a flood of
    humans shows how much he was loved and how much those who shot him in
    the back were not loved. Actually though, it was not only Turkey that
    sheltered those who didn't like Hrant. There were those who didn't
    like Hrant in the Armenian diaspora also, as well as in Armenia. With
    the slaughter of a man who had said: "This fight cannot last forever;
    we have lived together for hundreds of years on this soil; Turkey
    is changing, we now discuss everything; we will definitely come to
    a solution on these problems," voices now rose in protest, asking,
    "Wasn't Turkey supposed to be changing?"

    Hrant was targeted by many different sources. But actually, as we all
    knew, the real target was Turkey's democratization and its period
    of change. Hrant played a large role in the heating up of Turkey's
    inner dynamics. In one of his speeches, he said, "What happened
    to the Armenians has already happened, and the shedding of light
    on this problem is so crucial from the perspective of Turkey's own
    democratization and the questioning of its stance on official history."

    When he visited Armenia, Hrant would tell people there about his life
    in Turkey. He explained that Turks did not chase after Armenians with
    axes in their hands. He described the existence of Turkish sorrow
    about the events of 1915. He told people how much he loved Turkey
    and said there was nowhere else he would want to live.

    He would bring with him a few newspapers from Turkey, and he would meet
    with people from every circle, talking of the need for a solution,
    of a need to open up the borders between Turkey and Armenia. Hrant
    told the Armenian diaspora about Turks and reminded Armenians in the
    diaspora who didn't want relations with Turkey about Armenia itself:
    "That nation cannot breathe. ... It is as comfortable as you."

    For two years now, Hrant has been sleeping under the soil of
    this nation whose land he never left, even in the most difficult
    moments. But differences are still not really accepted on this soil. We
    can't even seem to stand slogans like "We are all Hrant. We are all
    Armenian." This despite the fact that, all over Turkey, young Kirkos,
    Stavros, Anahits and Rojbins make the oath, without thinking about
    their ethnic origins and without shirking, "We are Turkish, we are
    right, we are hard-working" in schools across the country. Why does
    the "Armenian threat" still exist? Why do we still believe Turks are
    waiting for us with axes? We cannot solve our problems without breaking
    our preconceptions. If we intend to live together on this soil as one,
    then come, let's give up our identities as Armenian, Turkish, Kurdish,
    Jewish, atheist, female and male, and let's just be Hrant for a day.
Working...
X