Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: If Dersim was a massacre, what was the other thing?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: If Dersim was a massacre, what was the other thing?

    Hurriyet Daily News, Turkey
    Nov 20 2009


    If Dersim was a massacre, what was the other thing?


    Friday, November 20, 2009
    ERTUÄ?RUL Ã-ZKÃ-K


    One of the things we have been talking over is this: Will the
    Republican People's Party, or CHP, lose votes because of Onur Ã-ymen's
    remarks over the Dersim revolt?

    Discussions over the incident are taking a different turn, a turn for
    settling scores in internal politics. I am not fond of Ã-ymen as a
    politician. I have criticized him a lot in the past. And I believe his
    recklessness in this incident harms the CHP.

    Still, I cannot help myself but ask the following question: Is the
    ruling Justice and Development Party, or AKP, benefiting from this
    ongoing discussion as Ã-ymen continues to harm the CHP?

    Let's make a self-criticism here. Look and see what kind of situations
    we have to be ready for in the discussions over the Dersim revolt:

    Prime Minister Recep Tayyip ErdoÄ?an chose the words `Dersim massacre'
    as he was criticizing Ã-ymen's remarks during a plenary session in
    Parliament. Mr. Prime Minister had issued a statement recently over
    the `Darfur massacre.' He had said, `Muslims don't commit massacre...'
    (According to some sources, he did not say `don't commit¦' but `cannot
    commit¦') Who, then, bombed out caves and cut the throats of Alevi
    Kurds in Dersim?

    Were they `Christian Turks?'

    The first beneficial result of the `Dersim' debate is this: That means
    Muslims do commit, or can commit, massacre. Then we have to take the
    second step:

    We shouldn't withhold a similar categorization for the events in
    Darfur. If the Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir gets offended, we
    have an excuse in foreign policy then:

    `Look my friend! I do call what my own people commit `massacre' so
    don't be offended by my remarks.'

    Let's move on to the bigger issue now: Turkey has tremendously
    benefited from Ã-ymen's unfortunate remarks over the Dersim revolt.
    Even I didn't know enough about the Dersim incident, but I have
    learned now.

    Let me make a confession here: I thought that it was one of the 28
    suppressions of Kurdish revolts. But now I'm reading books about
    Dersim. But I haven't been able to get one answer yet: How many people
    died in the Dersim incident?

    I have checked the figures; somewhere between 7,000 and 90,000 people
    were killed: The second question is this: If the killing of
    7,000-90,000 is a `massacre,' according to even the most official
    voice, what then will we call the losses in the Armenian question?

    According to Armenian allegations, a total of 1.5 million were killed
    in 1915. But let's say the death toll was 600,000. How many times more
    of those who were killed in Dersim? If the number of dead in Dersim
    was 7,000, it is 200 times more; if 90,000 then 17 times more. Yes, if
    the Dersim incident was a massacre, then what was the Armenian
    incident?

    Is it called a big massacre, a huge one or a tremendous mass-killing?
    As this question is posed to the top authority in Turkey, what will be
    the `official answer?' He will probably say `Don't be hard on
    yourself. There is a universal term used for that and it starts with
    `so-called'.'

    The Dersim debate in Parliament means we are refusing our `official
    history theses.' That's fine, but how will we get by with adopting an
    unofficial political language at home and an official language abroad?

    Politicians exploiting the Dersim revolt for electoral should focus on
    this, too.

    My last word is this: Ã-ymen's remarks weren't too clever. But it may
    not be a good thing to use them as political gimmicks.

    If we successfully manage to reveal what was done to our own people in
    Dersim, then debates over Dersim happen to be extremely useful.

    * Mr. ErtuÄ?rul Ã-zkök is the editor-in-chief of daily Hürriyet in which
    this piece appeared Friday. It was translated into English by the
    Daily News staff.

    http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=i f-dersim-was-a-massacre-how-about-the-other-2009-1 1-20

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X