Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mediators report progress in rebel Karabakh talks

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mediators report progress in rebel Karabakh talks

    Reuters, UK
    Nov 22 2009


    Mediators report progress in rebel Karabakh talks

    Sun Nov 22, 2009 1:31pm EST

    * Difficulties also identified - French envoy
    * Turkey wants Armenian concessions before opening border
    * Azeri leader warned of force ahead of meeting (Adds quotes, background)

    By Anna Holzer

    MUNICH, Germany, Nov 22 (Reuters) - Mediators reported important
    progress at talks on Sunday between Azerbaijan and Armenia on the
    Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, but said difficulties were also identified
    as the Azeri leader threatened renewed war.

    Tensions over the breakaway mountain region are rising, with
    oil-producing Azerbaijan angry at a deal between ally Turkey and
    Armenia to open their border, 16 years after Ankara closed it in
    solidarity with Azerbaijan during the Nagorno-Karabakh war.

    Turkey says it will only go through with the deal if Armenia makes
    concessions on Nagorno-Karabakh, where ethnic Armenians backed by
    Christian Armenia broke away from Muslim Azerbaijan as the Soviet
    Union headed towards its 1991 collapse.

    The rebel territory lies at the heart of the South Caucasus, a
    strategic crossroads and key transit region for oil and gas, where
    Russia and the West are vying for influence.

    Mediators from the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe
    gave few details after four hours of talks between Azeri President
    Ilham Aliyev and his Armenian counterpart Serzh Sarksyan, but reported
    progress as well as difficulties.

    Both presidents left the meeting at the French General Consul's
    residence in Munich without talking to reporters. It was their sixth
    meeting this year.

    "Some important progress has been reached," French mediator Bernard
    Fassier told reporters. "At the same time we have identified some
    difficulties."

    Fassier said he and his co-mediators from the United States and Russia
    would start preparing the next meeting, without specifying when it
    might take place. "We hope for additional progress in the following
    weeks and beginning of next year."



    "MILITARY MEANS"

    Aliyev, whose country is being courted by Europe to supply gas for the
    planned Nabucco pipeline, had raised the stakes before the talks,
    warning that the meeting would be "decisive" and that his army was
    ready to take back the region by force.

    "Azerbaijan is spending billions on buying new weapons, hardware,
    strengthening its position on the line of contact," Aliyev said in
    comments broadcast on Saturday. "We have the full right to liberate
    our land by military means."

    Fassier, in response, said: "Our governments are of the opinion that
    war is not an option."

    Analysts say Aliyev's warning reflects Azeri anger over the deal
    between Turkey and Armenia, which is aimed at burying a century of
    hostility stemming from the mass killing of Armenians by Ottoman
    Turks.

    The deal carries huge significance for Turkey's diplomatic clout in
    the strategic Caucasus region, for its bid to join the European Union,
    and for landlocked Armenia's struggling economy.

    Azerbaijan fears it will lose leverage over Armenia. Stung by the
    backlash and facing tough talks over Azeri gas supplies, Ankara says
    it wants progress on Nagorno-Karabakh before it ratifies the Armenia
    deal. Armenia rejects the link.

    Some 30,000 people died and more than one million were made homeless
    before a ceasefire was declared in Nagorno-Karabakh in 1993. The
    territory wants recognition as an independent state, but without a
    full peace deal sporadic exchanges of fire continue to threaten fresh
    conflict.

    The principles of a deal would see Nagorno-Karabakh give back most of
    seven surrounding Azeri districts captured during the war, in exchange
    for greater international legitimacy before a popular vote in the
    future to decide its final status. (Writing by Matt Robinson; editing
    by Elizabeth Fullerton) (([email protected]; +995 32
    999 370))

    http://www.reuters.com/article/homepageCris is/idUSGEE5AL03X._CH_.2400
Working...
X