Tweet
'PASSING GENOCIDE RESOLUTION WILL POISON THE NORMALIZATION PROCESS'
Hurriyet
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.co m/n.php?n=passing-genocide-resolution-will-poison- the-normalization-process-2010-02-19
Feb 19 2010
Turkey
According to the majority of Washington, D.C., insiders, the Armenian
genocide resolution will pass the House Foreign Relations Committee
in early March. Similar resolutions have already passed several times
in the past, and the issue is being handled like a "Sword of Damocles"
against Turkey, according to the Turkish side.
Turkey sees the resolution as poison for the normalization process.
Some argue that it is a poison not just for the Turkey-Armenia
relationship. As one important foreign-affairs official said when I was
in Turkey recently, "it has the potential to poison Turkish-American
relationships as well."
The Armenian genocide resolution being taken up by the House
Foreign Relations Committee has huge implications for international
relationships, though it is essentially being steered by U.S. domestic
politics. As former U.S. Rep. Robert Wexler pointed out, many
members of Congress feel they have to honor the promises they made
when they were running for their seats under pressure from members
of the Armenian diaspora in their districts.
Another equation in the matter that relates to American domestic
politics is the Democratic Party's extremely vulnerable standing in a
mid-term election year. According to the Cook Political Report, one of
the best handicappers, there is a chance that the Democrats could lose
their majority in the Senate in the upcoming elections, after losing
the filibuster-proof, super-majority in the Massachusetts elections
Jan. 20. Therefore, in such a difficult year, many Congressional
figures do not want to ire the Armenian voter base.
Therefore, the "all politics is local" principle is very much alive
when it comes to this issue as well, especially in this year. The
problem is, this time, the results of the domestic political interests
of members of the U.S. Congress might have a tremendously damaging
impact on both American-Turkish and Turkish-Armenian relations.
The Turkish administration also thinks that such a resolution, which
will urge U.S. President Barack Obama to recognize the tragic events
early last century as genocide, "will prejudice the possible findings
and studies of the History Commission that is expected to be created
by ratifying protocols."
I think all parties would accept that the normalization process
between Turkey and Armenia is not going the way one would like to see
it going. However, as Wexler pointed out in the same speech at Seta
D.C., both countries' leaders should be applauded and encouraged for
their courageous risk-taking in domestic and foreign affairs instead
of threatened by other countries' legislation branches.
In my last column, I openly criticized the Turkish administration
for the way it is handling the protocols process so far, as it seems
to me that Turkey has missed some of the tactical steps badly and at
present it is tumbling.
However, criticizing Turkey's approach to the protocols does not
mean one should overlook the U.S. Congress' mismanaging or using the
resolution in a seemingly very narrow-minded and domestic-focused
fashion.
When Obama came into office, there was a moment of "Obama bounce"
in many countries, including Turkey, as his election changed many
of the misgivings of the past, though anti-Americanism is still
an important factor among the Turkish public. According to Turkish
officials, this image-building work would be hit immensely if such
a resolution passes. And this is not a guess.
"If the resolution passes, Turkey would not step back, and its
reaction could be very severe," one high-ranking Turkish official says,
referencing what happened in 2007, when Turkey recalled then-Ambassador
Nabi Å~^ensoy back to Ankara for the first time in history, as a
traditional showing of protest.
Turkish foreign affairs, "with its new Caucasus vision, would like
to regard the region as a whole concept." And the Turkish-Armenian
normalization process should also be seen as an element of this
concept. Therefore, according to Turkey, America's legislative branch
should not take actions to make matters worse for U.S. national
security and geopolitical interests in a time when America is already
going through a tough period in the same region.
Still, what happens if the resolution passes in a key
U.S. congressional committee early next month and consequently passes
on the floor of the House of Representatives? First of all, so far
none of the people I have talked to, many of whom are extremely
involved with the process, predict that the resolution will pass on
the House floor, even if the majority of the same people think that
the resolution will pass at the committee level. However, according to
Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, even successful passage at
the committee level will "torpedo" the ratification of the protocols
in the Turkish Parliament.
Turkey's position against the recognition of genocide at the
presidential level would be much starker than the congressional level.
With its new-found proactive foreign affairs, Turkey believes it
can recalculate the changing dynamics in the region and reconsider
its positioning with respect to the relations in its traditional
U.S. alliance.
When I asked Congressman Wexler at Seta D.C. why the
U.S. administration has been surprisingly quiet so far over the
Armenian genocide resolution, he agreed that there is indeed a silence
on the U.S. administration side, though he added that he expects the
State Department and Pentagon to put up the same kind of fight against
the resolution as past administrations did. Nonetheless, he openly
stated that the U.S. administration's attitude toward the resolution
"remains to be seen."
Stephen Larrabee from the RAND Corporation said that he expects Obama
to be talking behind the scenes with congressional leaders to stop
the resolution. Two leaders in the Jewish community in Washington
that I talked to, however, acknowledged off the record that this
time around, neither Jewish representatives nor the various Jewish
lobbies in Washington will fight against the resolution. The reason,
I think is obvious: to protest Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
Erdogan's attitude toward Israel.
The president of the American-Turkish Council, Ambassador James Holmes,
stated in an interview with me that "the U.S. Congress was shut down
last week because of snow, and this week it is also in Presidents'
Day holiday recess. There will be only four or five days left to
reach out to different House Foreign Relations Committee members to
explain Turkey's position. It seems to me, they are trying to pass
this resolution in a quick and clandestine fashion this year."
It might be safe to say that there is very little convincing evidence
to argue that the genocide resolution will be stopped in early March.
Turkish Ambassador Namik Tan will be presenting his credentials to
President Obama on Feb. 25 and will resume his post right after,
in a very toilsome period. As one congressional source who is close
to the Jewish lobbying forces told me this week, "Tan's appointment
to Washington is one of the best pieces of news to come out of the
Turkish side in recent times."
I hope Ambassador Tan will be able to do his job adequately during
this difficult time. The ambassador is expected to resume his post
by many of Turkey's friends in Washington and he should be able to
have enough time and opportunities to display his diplomatic skills
in years to come.
Hurriyet
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.co m/n.php?n=passing-genocide-resolution-will-poison- the-normalization-process-2010-02-19
Feb 19 2010
Turkey
According to the majority of Washington, D.C., insiders, the Armenian
genocide resolution will pass the House Foreign Relations Committee
in early March. Similar resolutions have already passed several times
in the past, and the issue is being handled like a "Sword of Damocles"
against Turkey, according to the Turkish side.
Turkey sees the resolution as poison for the normalization process.
Some argue that it is a poison not just for the Turkey-Armenia
relationship. As one important foreign-affairs official said when I was
in Turkey recently, "it has the potential to poison Turkish-American
relationships as well."
The Armenian genocide resolution being taken up by the House
Foreign Relations Committee has huge implications for international
relationships, though it is essentially being steered by U.S. domestic
politics. As former U.S. Rep. Robert Wexler pointed out, many
members of Congress feel they have to honor the promises they made
when they were running for their seats under pressure from members
of the Armenian diaspora in their districts.
Another equation in the matter that relates to American domestic
politics is the Democratic Party's extremely vulnerable standing in a
mid-term election year. According to the Cook Political Report, one of
the best handicappers, there is a chance that the Democrats could lose
their majority in the Senate in the upcoming elections, after losing
the filibuster-proof, super-majority in the Massachusetts elections
Jan. 20. Therefore, in such a difficult year, many Congressional
figures do not want to ire the Armenian voter base.
Therefore, the "all politics is local" principle is very much alive
when it comes to this issue as well, especially in this year. The
problem is, this time, the results of the domestic political interests
of members of the U.S. Congress might have a tremendously damaging
impact on both American-Turkish and Turkish-Armenian relations.
The Turkish administration also thinks that such a resolution, which
will urge U.S. President Barack Obama to recognize the tragic events
early last century as genocide, "will prejudice the possible findings
and studies of the History Commission that is expected to be created
by ratifying protocols."
I think all parties would accept that the normalization process
between Turkey and Armenia is not going the way one would like to see
it going. However, as Wexler pointed out in the same speech at Seta
D.C., both countries' leaders should be applauded and encouraged for
their courageous risk-taking in domestic and foreign affairs instead
of threatened by other countries' legislation branches.
In my last column, I openly criticized the Turkish administration
for the way it is handling the protocols process so far, as it seems
to me that Turkey has missed some of the tactical steps badly and at
present it is tumbling.
However, criticizing Turkey's approach to the protocols does not
mean one should overlook the U.S. Congress' mismanaging or using the
resolution in a seemingly very narrow-minded and domestic-focused
fashion.
When Obama came into office, there was a moment of "Obama bounce"
in many countries, including Turkey, as his election changed many
of the misgivings of the past, though anti-Americanism is still
an important factor among the Turkish public. According to Turkish
officials, this image-building work would be hit immensely if such
a resolution passes. And this is not a guess.
"If the resolution passes, Turkey would not step back, and its
reaction could be very severe," one high-ranking Turkish official says,
referencing what happened in 2007, when Turkey recalled then-Ambassador
Nabi Å~^ensoy back to Ankara for the first time in history, as a
traditional showing of protest.
Turkish foreign affairs, "with its new Caucasus vision, would like
to regard the region as a whole concept." And the Turkish-Armenian
normalization process should also be seen as an element of this
concept. Therefore, according to Turkey, America's legislative branch
should not take actions to make matters worse for U.S. national
security and geopolitical interests in a time when America is already
going through a tough period in the same region.
Still, what happens if the resolution passes in a key
U.S. congressional committee early next month and consequently passes
on the floor of the House of Representatives? First of all, so far
none of the people I have talked to, many of whom are extremely
involved with the process, predict that the resolution will pass on
the House floor, even if the majority of the same people think that
the resolution will pass at the committee level. However, according to
Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, even successful passage at
the committee level will "torpedo" the ratification of the protocols
in the Turkish Parliament.
Turkey's position against the recognition of genocide at the
presidential level would be much starker than the congressional level.
With its new-found proactive foreign affairs, Turkey believes it
can recalculate the changing dynamics in the region and reconsider
its positioning with respect to the relations in its traditional
U.S. alliance.
When I asked Congressman Wexler at Seta D.C. why the
U.S. administration has been surprisingly quiet so far over the
Armenian genocide resolution, he agreed that there is indeed a silence
on the U.S. administration side, though he added that he expects the
State Department and Pentagon to put up the same kind of fight against
the resolution as past administrations did. Nonetheless, he openly
stated that the U.S. administration's attitude toward the resolution
"remains to be seen."
Stephen Larrabee from the RAND Corporation said that he expects Obama
to be talking behind the scenes with congressional leaders to stop
the resolution. Two leaders in the Jewish community in Washington
that I talked to, however, acknowledged off the record that this
time around, neither Jewish representatives nor the various Jewish
lobbies in Washington will fight against the resolution. The reason,
I think is obvious: to protest Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
Erdogan's attitude toward Israel.
The president of the American-Turkish Council, Ambassador James Holmes,
stated in an interview with me that "the U.S. Congress was shut down
last week because of snow, and this week it is also in Presidents'
Day holiday recess. There will be only four or five days left to
reach out to different House Foreign Relations Committee members to
explain Turkey's position. It seems to me, they are trying to pass
this resolution in a quick and clandestine fashion this year."
It might be safe to say that there is very little convincing evidence
to argue that the genocide resolution will be stopped in early March.
Turkish Ambassador Namik Tan will be presenting his credentials to
President Obama on Feb. 25 and will resume his post right after,
in a very toilsome period. As one congressional source who is close
to the Jewish lobbying forces told me this week, "Tan's appointment
to Washington is one of the best pieces of news to come out of the
Turkish side in recent times."
I hope Ambassador Tan will be able to do his job adequately during
this difficult time. The ambassador is expected to resume his post
by many of Turkey's friends in Washington and he should be able to
have enough time and opportunities to display his diplomatic skills
in years to come.