'TALAAT PASHA' RESIDING IN KREMLIN
Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/interview23012.html
Published: 16:38:56 - 19/08/2011
In September, the Medvedev-Gul meeting is expected during the summit
in Yaroslavl, and it has been announced that the Karabakh issue will
be discussed. What should be expected from this meeting?
Currently, it is necessary to be highly attentive and cautious to
everything concerning Russia's policy. Russia's political government
has led the country to a foreign political fiasco and is mocked by
the world. It is comforting that the Russian political literature has
already understood that Russia's policy includes a highly "principled"
technique - "handover" of partners and allies, ranging from separate
ethnic groups to entire countries. This is the tried and tested
"primakovian idea" and it allows for drawing profit out of it.
No doubt, the privileged political groups in Russia regularly make
money on foreign policies, including the "principle" of "handover". As
to the interests of Armenia, it should be noted, quite plausibly and
without a shade of emotion, that a "Talaat Pasha" is residing in the
Kremlin to whose defective mind it has occurred that he could sell
Armenia to the Turks for good money. Absolutely no success in foreign
policies, neither in the West, nor in the East and in the South. In
view to the elections, it is necessary to reach any success, just a
tiny one. The Kremlin thinks that the dialogue with Turkey, despite
dissatisfaction caused by the U.S. filigree policy, still possesses
some reserve, and the chance should be used.
There is only one thing "Talaat Pasha" can do - enter a deal with the
Turks, and most probably, a decision on this is already in place. At
any rate, there is a decision to strike a deal. But will Turkey
accept this initiative? To Turkey, Armenia and Karabakh is too little,
it needs greater concessions, larger in scope. Apparently, however,
no time is left, and soon "Talaat Pasha", together with his advisors
from the Institute of Modern Development (a new freebie called a
"think tank") will appear on the gallows, as it is usually the case
in Russia. "Talaat Pasha" has already blundered in his affair with
Azerbaijan. A failure with Turkey would lead to a catastrophe. The
impression is that "Talaat Pasha" has been let down by someone. What
foreign policy should be concerned in this mess?
Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/interview23012.html
Published: 16:38:56 - 19/08/2011
In September, the Medvedev-Gul meeting is expected during the summit
in Yaroslavl, and it has been announced that the Karabakh issue will
be discussed. What should be expected from this meeting?
Currently, it is necessary to be highly attentive and cautious to
everything concerning Russia's policy. Russia's political government
has led the country to a foreign political fiasco and is mocked by
the world. It is comforting that the Russian political literature has
already understood that Russia's policy includes a highly "principled"
technique - "handover" of partners and allies, ranging from separate
ethnic groups to entire countries. This is the tried and tested
"primakovian idea" and it allows for drawing profit out of it.
No doubt, the privileged political groups in Russia regularly make
money on foreign policies, including the "principle" of "handover". As
to the interests of Armenia, it should be noted, quite plausibly and
without a shade of emotion, that a "Talaat Pasha" is residing in the
Kremlin to whose defective mind it has occurred that he could sell
Armenia to the Turks for good money. Absolutely no success in foreign
policies, neither in the West, nor in the East and in the South. In
view to the elections, it is necessary to reach any success, just a
tiny one. The Kremlin thinks that the dialogue with Turkey, despite
dissatisfaction caused by the U.S. filigree policy, still possesses
some reserve, and the chance should be used.
There is only one thing "Talaat Pasha" can do - enter a deal with the
Turks, and most probably, a decision on this is already in place. At
any rate, there is a decision to strike a deal. But will Turkey
accept this initiative? To Turkey, Armenia and Karabakh is too little,
it needs greater concessions, larger in scope. Apparently, however,
no time is left, and soon "Talaat Pasha", together with his advisors
from the Institute of Modern Development (a new freebie called a
"think tank") will appear on the gallows, as it is usually the case
in Russia. "Talaat Pasha" has already blundered in his affair with
Azerbaijan. A failure with Turkey would lead to a catastrophe. The
impression is that "Talaat Pasha" has been let down by someone. What
foreign policy should be concerned in this mess?