Tweet
ARMENIA, THE CSTO AND COLLECTIVE SECURITY
http://www.eurasianet.org/node/63541
May 23, 2011 - 4:24pm, by Joshua Kucera
Would the Collective Security Treaty Organization come to Armenia's
aid in the event of a war with Azerbaijan over Nagorno Karabakh? It's
a question that has been the matter of speculation for some time. And
last week Armenia's defense minister said yes, the CSTO would support
Armenia. Via AFP:
"Given Armenia's membership in the CSTO, we can count on an appropriate
response and the support of our allies in the organization, who have
specific responsibilities to each other and the ability to react
adequately to potential aggression," Defense Minister Seyran Ohanian
told a security conference in Yerevan.
Of course, what "an appropriate response" entails could be very much
up to interpretation. And much depends on whether the war would involve
only Karabakh -- which is de jure part of Azerbaijan -- or Armenia. If
the former, the CSTO would be less likely to get involved, since it
wouldn't involve an attack on a member nation. In a piece called
"Kazakhstan dashes Armenia's collective security hopes," News.az
quotes a couple of Kazakh security experts saying making that point:
"If a military conflict began in Nagorno-Karabakh, this would not be
an attack by Azerbaijan on Armenia", [Murat] Laumulin [senior fellow
at the Kazakh president's Strategic Research Institute] said. "This
issue is Azerbaijan's internal affair, because Nagorno-Karabakh is
a part of Azerbaijan's administrative territory...."
The director for analysis and consulting at Kazakhstan's Institute
of Political Solutions, Rustam Burnashev, shares Laumulin's view.
He said that the Nagorno Karabakh conflict was an internal Azerbaijani
affair: "What's most important is how much Armenia itself would
raise this issue and how much Azerbaijan would bring it before the
international community."
"The interpretation of the Karabakh conflict by Azerbaijan and Armenia
does not envisage a direct clash between them," Burnashev said.
But both of those comments imply that an attack on Armenia could
trigger the collective security obligation of the CSTO, which
would still be a substantial advantage for Armenia should war over
Karabakh break out. It would mean that Armenia could attack targets in
Azerbaijan proper (like oil facilities in Baku, for example) without
escalating the conflict, while Azerbaijan couldn't do the same (i.e.
attack Armenia) without getting the CSTO involved.
Then again, if a war started, legal questions might be thrown out
the window and CSTO member states -- particularly Russia -- would
make political/strategic decisions about whether or how much to get
involved. And then, frankly, it's much harder to imagine Moscow
calculating in favor of intervening on behalf of Armenia against
Azerbaijan. But let's hope it doesn't come to that.
http://www.eurasianet.org/node/63541
May 23, 2011 - 4:24pm, by Joshua Kucera
Would the Collective Security Treaty Organization come to Armenia's
aid in the event of a war with Azerbaijan over Nagorno Karabakh? It's
a question that has been the matter of speculation for some time. And
last week Armenia's defense minister said yes, the CSTO would support
Armenia. Via AFP:
"Given Armenia's membership in the CSTO, we can count on an appropriate
response and the support of our allies in the organization, who have
specific responsibilities to each other and the ability to react
adequately to potential aggression," Defense Minister Seyran Ohanian
told a security conference in Yerevan.
Of course, what "an appropriate response" entails could be very much
up to interpretation. And much depends on whether the war would involve
only Karabakh -- which is de jure part of Azerbaijan -- or Armenia. If
the former, the CSTO would be less likely to get involved, since it
wouldn't involve an attack on a member nation. In a piece called
"Kazakhstan dashes Armenia's collective security hopes," News.az
quotes a couple of Kazakh security experts saying making that point:
"If a military conflict began in Nagorno-Karabakh, this would not be
an attack by Azerbaijan on Armenia", [Murat] Laumulin [senior fellow
at the Kazakh president's Strategic Research Institute] said. "This
issue is Azerbaijan's internal affair, because Nagorno-Karabakh is
a part of Azerbaijan's administrative territory...."
The director for analysis and consulting at Kazakhstan's Institute
of Political Solutions, Rustam Burnashev, shares Laumulin's view.
He said that the Nagorno Karabakh conflict was an internal Azerbaijani
affair: "What's most important is how much Armenia itself would
raise this issue and how much Azerbaijan would bring it before the
international community."
"The interpretation of the Karabakh conflict by Azerbaijan and Armenia
does not envisage a direct clash between them," Burnashev said.
But both of those comments imply that an attack on Armenia could
trigger the collective security obligation of the CSTO, which
would still be a substantial advantage for Armenia should war over
Karabakh break out. It would mean that Armenia could attack targets in
Azerbaijan proper (like oil facilities in Baku, for example) without
escalating the conflict, while Azerbaijan couldn't do the same (i.e.
attack Armenia) without getting the CSTO involved.
Then again, if a war started, legal questions might be thrown out
the window and CSTO member states -- particularly Russia -- would
make political/strategic decisions about whether or how much to get
involved. And then, frankly, it's much harder to imagine Moscow
calculating in favor of intervening on behalf of Armenia against
Azerbaijan. But let's hope it doesn't come to that.