Tweet
ARMENIAN GENOCIDE AND ANZAC DAY
Stephen Keys
Scoop.co.nz
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1204/S00158/armenian-genocide-and-anzac-day.htm
April 26 2012
New Zealand
Every year on the 25th of April, New Zealand and Australia commemorate
ANZAC day. This day was chosen as it was the first day of the ill
fated Gallipoli campaign of 1915, the ill conceived and executed
attempt to wrest the Dardanelles from Turkish hands.
Most New Zealanders are not aware of horrifying and brutal event that
is commemorated the day before, also dating from 1915 - the Armenian
Genocide. While the New Zealand, Australian and Turkish governments
actively promote and mythologise the carnage that took place at
Gallipoli there is never a mention made of the concurrent, systematic
extermination of over a million men, women and children of Armenian
descent by a mixture of Turkish regular forces, "special operations"
groups of criminals, Kurdish and Turkish "irregulars". Despite 20
other countries and 44 US states recognizing the genocide, neither
New Zealand nor Australia has done so and Turkey denies genocide even
happened, merely some regrettable incidents.
As Turkish academic Taner Akcam, author or the 2006 book, A Shameful
Act: The Armenian Genocide and the Question of Turkish Responsibility
has noted, "Denial of the Armenian Genocide has developed over the
decades to become a complex and far-reaching machine that rivals
the Nazi Germany propaganda ministry. This machine runs on academic
dishonesty, fabricated information, political pressure, intimidation
and threats, all funded or supported, directly or indirectly, by the
Turkish state. It has become a huge industry."
Not only that but under Article 301 of the Turkish penal code numerous
journalists and scholars have been prosecuted for "denigrating
Turkishness" by criticising Turkish actions during and after the
genocide.
This is all the more remarkable for unlike the Holocaust inflicted on
the Jews, the Armenian slaughter was well documented and reported at
the time, particularly by American diplomats and newspapers including
The New York Times. But as Akcam pointed out the Turkish denial has
been so strident and intense that combined with their willingness to
use their new found strategic importance to Western governments, has
allowed them to downgrade genocide to a series of unfortunate events.
Is this the sort of government we as New Zealanders are proud to stand
along side on April 25, 2015? Would we commemorate for instance the
Battle of El Alamein or Crete with a future German government that
decided to revise German culpability for the Jewish Holocaust? By
ignoring the Armenian commemoration the day before aren't New Zealand
and Australia tacitly complicit in Holocaust denial, for it was indeed
the 20th century's first Holocaust, equal to any that preceded or
followed it in its savagery and intent. Winston Churchill himself used
the H word and mused that the defeat at Gallipoli may have emboldened
the Young Turk leaders and exacerbated the violence.
Turkish denials coalese around multiple arguments that the mass
deportations and deaths were not planned and co-ordinated by the
government; the deaths were mostly from starvation due to famine during
war; that the Armenians were a fifth column threat to the Turkish
Army and had to be removed from areas of battle; that in the civil
disorder created by war massacres happened but some of them were by
Armenians too and that millions of Muslims of the Ottoman Empire had
been killed in the previous century so there was some unpleasant but
understandable revenge being taken by local groups.
There is of course an element of truth to some of these claims and
others. The ethnic animosity in the region was often violent. But the
fact remains there was a secret, organised programme of extermination
of the Armenians planned by the Young Turk Government. A cable
from Interior Minister Taalat Pasha to a regional prefect states:
"You have already been informed that the Government...has decided to
destroy completely all the indicated persons living in Turkey...Their
existence must be terminated, however tragic the measures taken may be,
and no regard must be paid to either age or sex, or to any scruples
of conscience."
And 'tragic" the measures were. Long forced marches without food
and water culled the old and very young, children were burnt alive,
groups roped together and pushed into rivers, boat loads taken out
to sea and pushed overboard, vast caves in the desert filled with
thousands to be burnt or suffocated by fire and smoke. Along the way
there was mass rape and pillage of belongings and young women by bands
of Kurds (a sad irony given Turkey's current violent persecution of
its Kurdish minority)
The academic research seems overwhelming in favour of genocide. For
example in 2005 The International Association of Genocide Scholars
declared as part of a letter to the Turkish Government: "On April 24,
1915, under cover of World War I, the Young Turk government of the
Ottoman Empire began a systematic genocide of its Armenian citizens -
an unarmed Christian minority population. More than a million Armenians
were exterminated through direct killing, starvation, torture, and
forced death marches."
No one is suggesting that modern Turks are responsible for genocide
any more than modern Germans but the denial and radical nationalism
of Turkey is a blot on their conscience. They steadfastly refuse to
face their historical demons the way the Germans have.
The question is whether made aware of the circumstances of the Armenian
Genocide and the continued Turkish denials we think our government
should recognise the tragedy and face Turkish wrath and possible
blow back on Gallipoli or decide that our commemorations are more
important and the Armenian Genocide is none of our business. 2700 New
Zealanders and 8700 Australians died at Gallipoli. Somewhere between
1-1.5 million Armenians were killed between late 1914 and 1923.
I suggest if you have any empathy for your fellow human being the
answer will be an easy one.
Stephen Keys
Scoop.co.nz
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1204/S00158/armenian-genocide-and-anzac-day.htm
April 26 2012
New Zealand
Every year on the 25th of April, New Zealand and Australia commemorate
ANZAC day. This day was chosen as it was the first day of the ill
fated Gallipoli campaign of 1915, the ill conceived and executed
attempt to wrest the Dardanelles from Turkish hands.
Most New Zealanders are not aware of horrifying and brutal event that
is commemorated the day before, also dating from 1915 - the Armenian
Genocide. While the New Zealand, Australian and Turkish governments
actively promote and mythologise the carnage that took place at
Gallipoli there is never a mention made of the concurrent, systematic
extermination of over a million men, women and children of Armenian
descent by a mixture of Turkish regular forces, "special operations"
groups of criminals, Kurdish and Turkish "irregulars". Despite 20
other countries and 44 US states recognizing the genocide, neither
New Zealand nor Australia has done so and Turkey denies genocide even
happened, merely some regrettable incidents.
As Turkish academic Taner Akcam, author or the 2006 book, A Shameful
Act: The Armenian Genocide and the Question of Turkish Responsibility
has noted, "Denial of the Armenian Genocide has developed over the
decades to become a complex and far-reaching machine that rivals
the Nazi Germany propaganda ministry. This machine runs on academic
dishonesty, fabricated information, political pressure, intimidation
and threats, all funded or supported, directly or indirectly, by the
Turkish state. It has become a huge industry."
Not only that but under Article 301 of the Turkish penal code numerous
journalists and scholars have been prosecuted for "denigrating
Turkishness" by criticising Turkish actions during and after the
genocide.
This is all the more remarkable for unlike the Holocaust inflicted on
the Jews, the Armenian slaughter was well documented and reported at
the time, particularly by American diplomats and newspapers including
The New York Times. But as Akcam pointed out the Turkish denial has
been so strident and intense that combined with their willingness to
use their new found strategic importance to Western governments, has
allowed them to downgrade genocide to a series of unfortunate events.
Is this the sort of government we as New Zealanders are proud to stand
along side on April 25, 2015? Would we commemorate for instance the
Battle of El Alamein or Crete with a future German government that
decided to revise German culpability for the Jewish Holocaust? By
ignoring the Armenian commemoration the day before aren't New Zealand
and Australia tacitly complicit in Holocaust denial, for it was indeed
the 20th century's first Holocaust, equal to any that preceded or
followed it in its savagery and intent. Winston Churchill himself used
the H word and mused that the defeat at Gallipoli may have emboldened
the Young Turk leaders and exacerbated the violence.
Turkish denials coalese around multiple arguments that the mass
deportations and deaths were not planned and co-ordinated by the
government; the deaths were mostly from starvation due to famine during
war; that the Armenians were a fifth column threat to the Turkish
Army and had to be removed from areas of battle; that in the civil
disorder created by war massacres happened but some of them were by
Armenians too and that millions of Muslims of the Ottoman Empire had
been killed in the previous century so there was some unpleasant but
understandable revenge being taken by local groups.
There is of course an element of truth to some of these claims and
others. The ethnic animosity in the region was often violent. But the
fact remains there was a secret, organised programme of extermination
of the Armenians planned by the Young Turk Government. A cable
from Interior Minister Taalat Pasha to a regional prefect states:
"You have already been informed that the Government...has decided to
destroy completely all the indicated persons living in Turkey...Their
existence must be terminated, however tragic the measures taken may be,
and no regard must be paid to either age or sex, or to any scruples
of conscience."
And 'tragic" the measures were. Long forced marches without food
and water culled the old and very young, children were burnt alive,
groups roped together and pushed into rivers, boat loads taken out
to sea and pushed overboard, vast caves in the desert filled with
thousands to be burnt or suffocated by fire and smoke. Along the way
there was mass rape and pillage of belongings and young women by bands
of Kurds (a sad irony given Turkey's current violent persecution of
its Kurdish minority)
The academic research seems overwhelming in favour of genocide. For
example in 2005 The International Association of Genocide Scholars
declared as part of a letter to the Turkish Government: "On April 24,
1915, under cover of World War I, the Young Turk government of the
Ottoman Empire began a systematic genocide of its Armenian citizens -
an unarmed Christian minority population. More than a million Armenians
were exterminated through direct killing, starvation, torture, and
forced death marches."
No one is suggesting that modern Turks are responsible for genocide
any more than modern Germans but the denial and radical nationalism
of Turkey is a blot on their conscience. They steadfastly refuse to
face their historical demons the way the Germans have.
The question is whether made aware of the circumstances of the Armenian
Genocide and the continued Turkish denials we think our government
should recognise the tragedy and face Turkish wrath and possible
blow back on Gallipoli or decide that our commemorations are more
important and the Armenian Genocide is none of our business. 2700 New
Zealanders and 8700 Australians died at Gallipoli. Somewhere between
1-1.5 million Armenians were killed between late 1914 and 1923.
I suggest if you have any empathy for your fellow human being the
answer will be an easy one.