NKR DEFENSE ARMY RESPONDED TO AZERBAIJANI DEFENSE MINISTRY FALSE STATEMENTS
ARMENPRESS
7 August, 2012
YEREVAN
YEREVAN, AUGUST 7, ARMENPRESS: Media and propaganda department of
Nagorno-Karabakh Defense Army responded to the Azerbaijani Defense
Ministry. The statement provided to Armenpres runs as follows:
"Recently Azerbaijani propaganda machine has speculated rumors that
as a result of military actions conducted by Azerbaijan,under the
leadership of Azerbaijani Defense Minister S. Abiev have occupied
a hill of strategic importance, and as if many of Armenian soldiers
there voluntarily surrendered which is nothing more than the product
of a sick imagination".
Moreover it is not difficult to conclude by the information content
that the Azerbaijani Defense Ministry's "secret source" not only lack
elementary strategic and tactical thinking but deprived of geological
position defining ability. It is ridiculous when the author referring
to the testimony of an officer engaged in so called " military actions"
states as though from the "captured" hill "Aghdaran" (Martakert) and
"Kelbajar" (Karvachar) and all the processes that take place in depth
are quite visible.
Information and Propaganda Department of Defense Army informs that
in real Azerbaijani side has captured the hill not from its former
position but from behind. The second, in the course of so called
"military actions" Azerbaijani Army did not caused troubles but itself
suffered losses; 1 killed and 2 wounded .
ARMENPRESS
7 August, 2012
YEREVAN
YEREVAN, AUGUST 7, ARMENPRESS: Media and propaganda department of
Nagorno-Karabakh Defense Army responded to the Azerbaijani Defense
Ministry. The statement provided to Armenpres runs as follows:
"Recently Azerbaijani propaganda machine has speculated rumors that
as a result of military actions conducted by Azerbaijan,under the
leadership of Azerbaijani Defense Minister S. Abiev have occupied
a hill of strategic importance, and as if many of Armenian soldiers
there voluntarily surrendered which is nothing more than the product
of a sick imagination".
Moreover it is not difficult to conclude by the information content
that the Azerbaijani Defense Ministry's "secret source" not only lack
elementary strategic and tactical thinking but deprived of geological
position defining ability. It is ridiculous when the author referring
to the testimony of an officer engaged in so called " military actions"
states as though from the "captured" hill "Aghdaran" (Martakert) and
"Kelbajar" (Karvachar) and all the processes that take place in depth
are quite visible.
Information and Propaganda Department of Defense Army informs that
in real Azerbaijani side has captured the hill not from its former
position but from behind. The second, in the course of so called
"military actions" Azerbaijani Army did not caused troubles but itself
suffered losses; 1 killed and 2 wounded .