Tweet
Injury Incompatible With Life
Janna Alexanyan
Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/society27157.html
Published: 11:43:40 - 23/08/2012
The Police department investigating cases of special importance declared
completion of preliminary investigation of Vahe Avetyan's murder and gave
the representatives of the successor of the victim one day to get
acquainted with the case and file motions. The motion to extend the
deadline was rejected first then accepted in a few hours upon the order of
the prosecutor's office. Hence, the deadline was extended for another 5
working days.
The advocates of Vahe Avetyan's family Lousineh Hakobyan and Tigran
Yegoryan, apart from the problems brought up in the previous motion, have
reported some serious shortcomings in the preliminary examination. By the
way, the investigative body did not respond to the previous motion and the
next motion was rejected several hours after submission.
The advocates have studied and expressed reasonable suspicion about the
forensic conclusion which has a key importance to this case. In particular,
this conclusion states that the same injuries in a live person would are
considered as causing severe damage to heath or threatening life, both
separately and all together, in this case caused death.
The advocates say this conclusion allows the investigative body to adjust
the indictment. The same conclusion allowed qualifying the act as severe
bodily injury caused intentionally which negligently caused death.
Reliable specialists assure that Vahe Avetyan got injuries incompatible
with life immediately after the beating, and the medical data are the first
signs of death rather than injuries.
To prove this, the advocates refer to not only consultations with
specialists but also the record of the first medical examination of Vahe
Avetyan, CT scanning, justification of the first surgery, description of
the surgery, the justification of the second surgery which evidence Vahe
Avetyan's extremely bad state of health are succeeded by death.
As real conclusion, the advocates state that death was caused because it
was impossible to render harmless the injury which was incompatible with
life and not severe injuries and aggravation of their consequences.
This description of death totally changes the outcome of the case. The
investigative body must replace severe injury with murder.
The murderers were aware of the consequences of the severe beating. In
addition, Garik Margaryan, one of the accused, mentioned in his testimony
does wrestling everyday while Norair Hairapetyan is a professional judo
fighter, the picture becomes clear.
Considering this and other shortcomings during the examination, the
advocates demanded to start investigation afresh and reveal the full
picture of the crime.
By the way, the indictment has been sent to the prosecutor general's office
for approval. Will the Prosecutor General's Office approve these outrageous
shortcomings which the advocates mentioned.
The law enforcers are open and transparent, they do not hide that the
entire system is working for one person, Member of Parliament Ruben
Hairapetyan. Not only Ruben Hairapetyan but also each bodyguard is dear to
the system.**
Janna Alexanyan
Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/society27157.html
Published: 11:43:40 - 23/08/2012
The Police department investigating cases of special importance declared
completion of preliminary investigation of Vahe Avetyan's murder and gave
the representatives of the successor of the victim one day to get
acquainted with the case and file motions. The motion to extend the
deadline was rejected first then accepted in a few hours upon the order of
the prosecutor's office. Hence, the deadline was extended for another 5
working days.
The advocates of Vahe Avetyan's family Lousineh Hakobyan and Tigran
Yegoryan, apart from the problems brought up in the previous motion, have
reported some serious shortcomings in the preliminary examination. By the
way, the investigative body did not respond to the previous motion and the
next motion was rejected several hours after submission.
The advocates have studied and expressed reasonable suspicion about the
forensic conclusion which has a key importance to this case. In particular,
this conclusion states that the same injuries in a live person would are
considered as causing severe damage to heath or threatening life, both
separately and all together, in this case caused death.
The advocates say this conclusion allows the investigative body to adjust
the indictment. The same conclusion allowed qualifying the act as severe
bodily injury caused intentionally which negligently caused death.
Reliable specialists assure that Vahe Avetyan got injuries incompatible
with life immediately after the beating, and the medical data are the first
signs of death rather than injuries.
To prove this, the advocates refer to not only consultations with
specialists but also the record of the first medical examination of Vahe
Avetyan, CT scanning, justification of the first surgery, description of
the surgery, the justification of the second surgery which evidence Vahe
Avetyan's extremely bad state of health are succeeded by death.
As real conclusion, the advocates state that death was caused because it
was impossible to render harmless the injury which was incompatible with
life and not severe injuries and aggravation of their consequences.
This description of death totally changes the outcome of the case. The
investigative body must replace severe injury with murder.
The murderers were aware of the consequences of the severe beating. In
addition, Garik Margaryan, one of the accused, mentioned in his testimony
does wrestling everyday while Norair Hairapetyan is a professional judo
fighter, the picture becomes clear.
Considering this and other shortcomings during the examination, the
advocates demanded to start investigation afresh and reveal the full
picture of the crime.
By the way, the indictment has been sent to the prosecutor general's office
for approval. Will the Prosecutor General's Office approve these outrageous
shortcomings which the advocates mentioned.
The law enforcers are open and transparent, they do not hide that the
entire system is working for one person, Member of Parliament Ruben
Hairapetyan. Not only Ruben Hairapetyan but also each bodyguard is dear to
the system.**