Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Election 2012: Opp Pushes for End to Ruling Party's Power Monopoly

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Election 2012: Opp Pushes for End to Ruling Party's Power Monopoly

    Global Insight
    May 4, 2012


    Election 2012: Armenian Opposition Pushes for End to Ruling Party's
    Power Monopoly

    BYLINE: Lilit Gevorgyan


    The Armenian opposition parties have united to break the ruling
    Republican party's grip on parliament, pledging to turn the
    rubber-stamping legislature into a vibrant political forum and
    possibly pave the way for a parliamentary democracy.
    "The E-Day"

    Today (4 May) is the last day before all Armenian parties cease their
    almost-month-long election campaign and enter a day of silence
    followed by a crucial parliamentary vote on 6 May. Most of the
    opposition parties have called the upcoming vote Armenia's last chance
    to remedy the dire situation of the ineffective economy and
    large-scale emigration that was identified as an alarming development
    for the country even by the UN.

    The vote is also important as it will be the first nationwide poll
    since the election of President Serzh Sargsyan of the Republican Party
    in 2008. Then, the legitimacy of Sargsyan was challenged by the
    opposition led by Levon Ter-Petrossian, the first president of the
    Third Armenian Republic created in 1991 after the fall of the Soviet
    Union. The ensuing clashes between opposition protesters and the
    police on 1 March 2008 turned deadly and cast a long shadow on
    Sargsyan and his coalition government. Hence the upcoming election
    will be a test for his legitimacy and popularity ahead of 2013
    presidential race.

    The upcoming vote is also important as for the first time in 15 years
    Armenia is seeing an unprecedented political awakening both across the
    nation, most importantly in the rural areas. There has been a very
    noticeable improvement in freedom of campaigning through rallies,
    television debates, and the use of all types of media by all involved
    parties. In a welcome development the public space was not occupied by
    the presidential party but was open to the opposition--which did not
    shy away from sustained and harsh criticism of the current government.
    Meanwhile, the president and his party themselves have taken a more
    apologetic stance throughout the campaign and admitted their failings,
    including poor economic performance, which is a novelty in the last
    decade of Armenia's political life. Both the opposition and the
    current members of the two-party coalition government are hoping to
    capitalise on this political awakening and also cultivate their
    powerbase ahead of the presidential vote in 2013.

    Fake Versus Real Opposition

    One recurring theme in the election campaign was the accusations often
    thrown at each other by various parties of not being genuine
    opposition forces but rather fielded by the Republican Party to split
    the true opposition vote. The election campaign has also consolidated
    into a fewer blocs a number of political parties with often unclear
    political agendas for voters. This consolidation has also created
    unlikely partnerships united by a desire to see an end to Republican
    Party's monopoly.

    Prosperous Armenia (BH):Led by millionaire businessman Gagik
    Tsarukyan, this party in reality is part of the current government
    coalition with the Republican Party. However, in a surprise move, BH
    launched a campaign highly critical of the current president. There
    are widespread speculations that the party is becoming the main
    political force for the previous president Robert Kocharian to bid for
    the presidency next year. BH has refuted these claims but the
    appearance of Vartan Oskanian, Kocharian's foreign minister as the
    second candidate in BH's list of candidates under the proportional
    election law, has certainly contributed to these speculations. The
    opinion polls conducted by Gallup International reported that 29.9% of
    voters support BH compared to 39% for the Republican Party. Many
    voters believe that BH is not really a true opposition party.

    Armenian National Congress (ANC):This is an umbrella organisation that
    unites 18 parties and is headed by Levon Ter-Petrossian. He has led a
    long lasting anti -government campaign against President Sargsyan and
    his government that he has branded as "gangsters". However, ANC is
    likely to gain around 12% of the votes according to the opinion polls.
    Many voters believe that Ter-Petrossian is really part of the same
    political elite that he installed in the first place and he will not
    be able to bring any real changes.

    Heritage:Headed by US-born and educated Raffi Hovannisian, it is the
    only truly opposition party that has seats in the parliament. This
    small party has made an emphasis on political agenda rather than
    personalities and if favoured mostly by urban intellectuals. It is
    likely to attract 6% of the votes.

    Armenian Revolutionary Federation (ARF) - Dashnaktsutyun:Over 100
    years old, it is widely respected and is seen an independent player
    although its credentials have been somewhat tarnished after ARF joined
    the ruling coalition in 2008 which it left following disagreements
    over Sargsyan's decision to sign the failed Armenian-Turkish protocols
    in 2010. This is reflected in the thinning support of 5.3%.

    "The Cleanest Election"

    Hopes are high that the upcoming vote will be one of the most
    transparent in the past 15 years, a pledge also made by President
    Sargsyan. The government has invited a number of international
    observers to monitor the quality of the vote, including the
    Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe/Office for
    Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE/ODIHR); the
    Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe's (PACE),the International
    Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES), the European Parliament, and
    the International Expert Center for Electoral Systems (ICES). In total
    54 international and local organisations have fielded thousands of
    monitors while Armenia's Human Rights Ombudsman Karen Andreasyan will
    be in charge of the so-called "rapid reaction" mobile units that would
    respond to any reports of election fraud on 6 May. There are already
    first encouraging reaction from OSCE/ODIHR which on 27 April issued a
    statement describing a "vibrant" campaign where the contestants were
    "generally able to campaign and have been provided with free venues
    and poster space". But the report also highlighted that there were
    instances of obstructions, including violent scuffles.

    In an unprecedented move the opposition parties have also united in a
    multi-party anti-fraud headquarters where the participants have signed
    a document not to be involved in vote-rigging. However, the ruling
    Republican Party has refrained from joining the initiative and has
    unveiled its own commission, raising concerns about the credibility of
    their pledges to hold an honest vote. Furthermore, the opposition's
    own initiative has been undermined after one of its leaders, Tsarukyan
    of the Prosperous Armenia party, refused to personally sign the
    pledge. This triggered an exit from the pact by the Heritage party led
    by Raffi Hovannisian. While many have criticised Heritage's move it
    also gained the party credibility. This is because many view
    Tsarukyan's tactics of unfurling an expensive charity campaign in the
    lead-up to the vote, especially in the regions as a blatant violation
    of election campaigning rules. The OSCE/ODIHR report also backed this
    view.

    Outlook and Implications

    If the upcoming election is successful, Armenia could serve as a model
    for political changes in South Caucasus, an opinion also shared by the
    US ambassador to Yerevan John Heffern. Given its serious security
    problems with Azerbaijan and the threat of a new war, the Armenian
    public is reluctant to chose a revolutionary path of change of
    government. This was one of the reasons behind the absence of a
    "coloured revolution" in the country. But the political opposition is
    aware that the current state of affairs has to change to prevent the
    mass emigration and remedy the economic situation but also to keep up
    the morale in the country in the face of serious security threat from
    Azerbaijan.

    In some ways these security concerns have made the current government
    realise that to garner international support it has to be a
    legitimately elected government in the first place. These security
    concerns have also forced all the players to agree to a peaceful
    change which will have to come through sometimes unwanted compromises
    between unlikely bedfellows such as BH and former foreign minister
    Vartan Oskanian and the ANC. However, this appears to be the best way
    to begin step-by-step changes, where the first step would be
    dismantling the monopoly of power of the top party and creating an
    active parliament.



    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X