Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Mob Against the Journalist

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Mob Against the Journalist

    The Mob Against the Journalist

    April 25 2013


    I first heard the phrase `No filming here' addressed to me in August
    1990. Mesrop Movsesyan and I were covering the events related to the
    Armenian National Army (ANA). A group of armed people gathered outside
    the appliance center, and another group of armed people gathered
    outside the Erebuni hotel. Representatives of both groups would `urge'
    us holding automatic weapons in their arms not to film. Both in this
    case and in the future, I did not care so much about who was right and
    who was wrong in this conflict or other arguments; we needed to
    equally present the opinions of both sides, which we eventually did. I
    am sure that even today, after 23 years, the `descendants' of the
    Pan-Armenian National Movement (PANM) and the ANA will oppose to this
    balance and will say that they were right. However, the important for
    a journalist is to cover the events; the rest is just seasoning. I
    recalled this story yesterday with regard to the use of violence
    against my young colleague Hakob Karapetyan. Naturally, no one had
    explained to the neighborhood plug-ugly who was organizing Taron
    Margaryan's meeting with the residents in this case that in such
    cases, no one has the right to prevent a journalist from filming.
    Although I understand that Turbo (Ashot Papayan) and the other
    `Turbo-like' members of the mob feel uneasy when their activities
    become public; probably deep down, they are ashamed of how they `earn
    their living.' However, I am sure that there are people in the party,
    the Republican Party of Armenia (RPA), who are capable of explaining
    all that, who know that given the level of the internet's development,
    the pictures of the, to put it mildly, not so pleasant faces of
    `Turbos' will be spread and disseminated anyway; they also know that
    impeding a journalist's work is an offense punishable by the law. I
    don't know why they don't explain; perhaps they don't bother. I don't
    care at all whether the journalist who was attacked is from
    www.ilur.am or www.slaq.am, whether the covered campaign was that of
    the RPA or, say, the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (ARF); the
    government and the opposition, revolutionaries and conservatives
    change places so often that one hardly manages to follow. It is
    important for me that we, journalists, are able to cover the reality
    and to communicate it to society, and `seasoning' can be added by
    politicians or politicized people, it doesn't matter. In this sense, I
    want to pay attention to a very important fact. Was Hakob the only
    journalist who was holding a camera during that incident? Guess what
    would have happened, if 10 cameras had filmed the actions of the mob
    and then broadcasted them. Would they have ventured to take away the
    cameras of 10 journalists? ...There was an American short movie in the
    1960s called `The Incident' about how two punks board a subway car and
    terrorize more than ten passengers. However, each of them tries to
    solve only his problem. ARAM ABRAHAMYAN

    Read more at: http://en.aravot.am/2013/04/25/153905/

    © 1998 - 2013 Aravot - News from Armenia

Working...
X