Tweet
Democracy Against Freedom
Antique democracy originated not as an opposition to tyranny, but
rather as a method of suppressing freedoms, and it is because of this
that the ancient civilization suppressed and, in the end, destroyed
the culture. New democracy emerged as a way of organizing social
exploitation, which led to bloody and senseless class revolutions.
Then liberal democracy was invented, which, now, has been replaced by
the left liberal doctrine, designed to bring the world to the point of
absurdity, that is, to suppress and defeat the right idea, which is
true freedom.
The Western community has become imperative police that was the
essence of the system and order. In the West, the neighbors do not
kill each other because there are the police. For example, in Eastern
Europe, the neighbors do not kill the neighbors, not because they fear
the police, but because they would feel inconvenient to other
neighbors.
The liberal-democratic system of values has nothing to do with the
slogan of the French Revolution, and, above all, is designed to get
rid of the concept of `freedom' that is archaic and in the modern
world of crisis it is just funny.
The Western community, which, undoubtedly, involves also the Eastern
Europe, is overwhelmed with the wave of racism, Nazism and
anti-Semitism. Sure, anti-Semitism is the mirror of social moods.
Europe keeps boosting racism and anti-Semitism, while in the U.S.,
after the peak of anti-Semitism in the end of 2000, during the
presidential elections of George Bush, a stable level of anti-Semitism
was established. At the same time, in America, anti-Semitism, because
of the moods of lumpen and higher classes, became an element of
ideology of the middle class.
The kind of anti-Semitism of Henry Ford and Walt Disney does not exist
anymore, while the one of the prosperous and numerous middle class is
established. Which one is more dangerous? Western sociologists affirm
that racism and anti-Semitism of the middle class took the
national-social party of Germany to the power.
It would be naïve to see this kind of ideology as a reality of social
groups. Rather, anti-Semitism is born at the junction of
contradictions of Catholicism and Protestantism. For example,
paradoxically, with such rapid development of Islamic radicalism in
the Islamic countries, anti-Semitism was not born.
The strengthening of racism and anti-Semitism becomes an instrument to
cause a collapse of freedom principles, and the establishment of
democracy becomes a means to undermine freedoms because democracy
becomes a form of certain liberal-totalitarian methods without which
it is impossible to ensure legitimacy of the current
financial-economic systems and social relations.
Heads of leading Jewish NGOs of the U.S. categorically reject the fact
of strengthening of anti-Semitism, but other influential Jewish
representatives in New York, who pointed out V. Gusinski and B.
Berezovski, and to whom the Jewish leaders stand at attention or bend
(depending on the functional style), rather imaginatively share their
thoughts and reasons and motives for blowing up anti-Semitism in the
United States.
According to these powerful people, it is not about a new era of
anti-Semitism, but about liquidation of Israel. Not the Jews, but
Israel is the subject of hatred in the American community. My
U.S.-based Jewish friends, who are from Odessa and Baku and who are
quite successful in the United States, affirm that the `peak of Jewish
pride' has already passed, and the era or saying goodbye to the
illusions of `values' came back.
`Only the Russian and Eastern-European culture' may save the Jews, but
we understood this quite late'. Perspicacious observers affirm that
this period didn't start with Obama, but with the Bush administration
though this organization with its non-conservative figures was
maximally Jewish.
The `stone' has been moved and it flew down the abrupt mountain, and
it can't be stopped. But anyway, what are the reasons? The reason is
simple and evident: with the priorities of safety, no one wants to
hear about democratic values. Promotion of the interests of Israel
ceased to be an `untouchable' tenet of the U.S. policy and, especially
in Europe, from where no fewer Jews have left than from Eastern
Europe. For example, over the past 25 years, the number of Jews in the
UK fell from 700 to 270 thousand.
The `classic' country of anti-Semitism is Great Britain, which
finished its project of `Balfour' and finally dismissed Israel. This
is an important sign of revision of what was grandiloquently called
`Western values'.
Though strange it may seem, but the American Christian fundamentalism
is the last shelter of interests of Israel in the U.S. The point is
not the Jews or anti-Semitism, even not racism. The international
community chose concrete interests, in other words, the era of
liberal-democratic values has gone, and in the best case, the 19-th
century came back with its prelude nightmares.
Those who are trying to compare Atlantic and Eurasia, face the reality
that Russia is experiencing the same problems as the West, and at some
point though, it will anyway accept the consolidation doctrine of the
Western community. Certain states of the West are trying to prevent
solidarity between Atlantic and Eurasia, but they do not have the
strength or genuine ambitions to pursue this policy. `The leaders of
the world community are lost, their policy is lax, and the main thing
is to stand firmly on their positions.'
Igor Muradyan
13:29 27/04/2013
Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index.php/eng/0/comments/view/29745
From: Baghdasarian
Antique democracy originated not as an opposition to tyranny, but
rather as a method of suppressing freedoms, and it is because of this
that the ancient civilization suppressed and, in the end, destroyed
the culture. New democracy emerged as a way of organizing social
exploitation, which led to bloody and senseless class revolutions.
Then liberal democracy was invented, which, now, has been replaced by
the left liberal doctrine, designed to bring the world to the point of
absurdity, that is, to suppress and defeat the right idea, which is
true freedom.
The Western community has become imperative police that was the
essence of the system and order. In the West, the neighbors do not
kill each other because there are the police. For example, in Eastern
Europe, the neighbors do not kill the neighbors, not because they fear
the police, but because they would feel inconvenient to other
neighbors.
The liberal-democratic system of values has nothing to do with the
slogan of the French Revolution, and, above all, is designed to get
rid of the concept of `freedom' that is archaic and in the modern
world of crisis it is just funny.
The Western community, which, undoubtedly, involves also the Eastern
Europe, is overwhelmed with the wave of racism, Nazism and
anti-Semitism. Sure, anti-Semitism is the mirror of social moods.
Europe keeps boosting racism and anti-Semitism, while in the U.S.,
after the peak of anti-Semitism in the end of 2000, during the
presidential elections of George Bush, a stable level of anti-Semitism
was established. At the same time, in America, anti-Semitism, because
of the moods of lumpen and higher classes, became an element of
ideology of the middle class.
The kind of anti-Semitism of Henry Ford and Walt Disney does not exist
anymore, while the one of the prosperous and numerous middle class is
established. Which one is more dangerous? Western sociologists affirm
that racism and anti-Semitism of the middle class took the
national-social party of Germany to the power.
It would be naïve to see this kind of ideology as a reality of social
groups. Rather, anti-Semitism is born at the junction of
contradictions of Catholicism and Protestantism. For example,
paradoxically, with such rapid development of Islamic radicalism in
the Islamic countries, anti-Semitism was not born.
The strengthening of racism and anti-Semitism becomes an instrument to
cause a collapse of freedom principles, and the establishment of
democracy becomes a means to undermine freedoms because democracy
becomes a form of certain liberal-totalitarian methods without which
it is impossible to ensure legitimacy of the current
financial-economic systems and social relations.
Heads of leading Jewish NGOs of the U.S. categorically reject the fact
of strengthening of anti-Semitism, but other influential Jewish
representatives in New York, who pointed out V. Gusinski and B.
Berezovski, and to whom the Jewish leaders stand at attention or bend
(depending on the functional style), rather imaginatively share their
thoughts and reasons and motives for blowing up anti-Semitism in the
United States.
According to these powerful people, it is not about a new era of
anti-Semitism, but about liquidation of Israel. Not the Jews, but
Israel is the subject of hatred in the American community. My
U.S.-based Jewish friends, who are from Odessa and Baku and who are
quite successful in the United States, affirm that the `peak of Jewish
pride' has already passed, and the era or saying goodbye to the
illusions of `values' came back.
`Only the Russian and Eastern-European culture' may save the Jews, but
we understood this quite late'. Perspicacious observers affirm that
this period didn't start with Obama, but with the Bush administration
though this organization with its non-conservative figures was
maximally Jewish.
The `stone' has been moved and it flew down the abrupt mountain, and
it can't be stopped. But anyway, what are the reasons? The reason is
simple and evident: with the priorities of safety, no one wants to
hear about democratic values. Promotion of the interests of Israel
ceased to be an `untouchable' tenet of the U.S. policy and, especially
in Europe, from where no fewer Jews have left than from Eastern
Europe. For example, over the past 25 years, the number of Jews in the
UK fell from 700 to 270 thousand.
The `classic' country of anti-Semitism is Great Britain, which
finished its project of `Balfour' and finally dismissed Israel. This
is an important sign of revision of what was grandiloquently called
`Western values'.
Though strange it may seem, but the American Christian fundamentalism
is the last shelter of interests of Israel in the U.S. The point is
not the Jews or anti-Semitism, even not racism. The international
community chose concrete interests, in other words, the era of
liberal-democratic values has gone, and in the best case, the 19-th
century came back with its prelude nightmares.
Those who are trying to compare Atlantic and Eurasia, face the reality
that Russia is experiencing the same problems as the West, and at some
point though, it will anyway accept the consolidation doctrine of the
Western community. Certain states of the West are trying to prevent
solidarity between Atlantic and Eurasia, but they do not have the
strength or genuine ambitions to pursue this policy. `The leaders of
the world community are lost, their policy is lax, and the main thing
is to stand firmly on their positions.'
Igor Muradyan
13:29 27/04/2013
Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index.php/eng/0/comments/view/29745
From: Baghdasarian